2012 Annual Black History Theme = Black Women in American Culture and History

The Association for the Study of African American Life and History announced earlier this year that for 2012, the theme is “Black Women in American Culture and History.”  Here is an excerpt from the group’s announcement of the theme:

From the American Revolution to the present, African American women have played a myriad of critical roles in the making of our nation.  Their labor and leadership, their motherhood and patriotism, and their intellect and artistic expression have all enriched both the African American community and the nation at large.  In slavery and freedom, their struggles have been at the heart of the human experience, and their triumps over racism and sexism are a testimonial to our common human spirit.

Planned future themes are: (for 2013) “The 150th Anniversary of the Emancipation Proclamation;”  (for 2014) “The Golden Jubilee of the Civil Rights Act;” and (for 2015) “A Century of Black Life, History and Culture.”

For more info, see here.

The image above is from diversitystore.com and features these women:

  • Rosa Parks
  • Michelle Obama
  • Ida B Wells
  • Harriet Tubman
  • Sojourner Truth
  • Bessie Coleman
  • Madam CJ Walker
  • Ella Fitzgerald
  • Mary McLeod Bethune
  • Billie Holliday
  • Daisy Lee Gatson
  • Dorothy Irene Height
  • Marian Wright Edelman
  • Phillis Wheatley
  • Josephine Baker
  • Lucy Eldine Gonzalez Parsons

We need a poster of African-American women in law.  Let’s start with Sadie Alexander, Jane Matilda Bolin, Yvonne Burke,  Inez C. Fields, Ruth Cavers Flowers, Jacqueline Guild Lutie Lytle, Constance Baker Motley, Jane Cleo Marshall, Pauli Murray, Rachel E. Pruden-Herndon, Charlotte Ray and Lucia Theodosia Thomas.  And that’s not even venturing fully into the second half of the twentieth century.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal History | Leave a comment

When Pink Became a “Girl” Color

Jo B. Paoletti (American Studies, Maryland) tells the history in Pink and Blue: Telling the Boys from the Girls in America, published last month by Indiana University Press.  The book’s webpage has a slide show of greeting cards from 1960, when pink and blue were less gender-specific, Dr. Paoletti suggests.

Slideshow source here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Leave a comment

U Buffalo Faculty Wants School to Stop Supporting Business Groups That Endorse Conservative Causes

Yesterday’s Chronicle includes an article Faculty Union Calls on U. at Buffalo to Cut Ties to Chambers of Commerce that mentions Feminist Law Professor Martha McCluskey.   Journalist Peter Schmidt writes:

Opening a new front in the conflict between college labor unions and conservative advocacy groups, the University at Buffalo’s faculty union has resolved to pressure the institution to sever its ties with state and local chambers of commerce.

* * *

The University at Buffalo pays annual dues of $5,000 to the Business Council of New York State and of nearly $48,000 to the Buffalo Niagara Partnership. The university’s president, Satish K. Tripathi, is a member of the board of directors of the regional organization, while Nancy L. Zimpher, the chancellor of the State University of New York System, is a nonvoting member of the state chamber’s board of directors.

* * *

In New York, Andrew J. Rudnick, the president of the Buffalo Niagara Partnership, boasted in an August 2010 e-mail to its members that his organization had acquired a reputation as one of the most politically aggressive regional-business organizations in the nation. In that November’s elections, the group endorsed candidates for State Senate as part of an effort to help Republicans wrest control of that body from Democrats.

The Business Council of New York similarly endorsed a slate of Republican candidates in the 2010 State Senate races. Last year it listed among its lobbying priorities limiting annual increases in state spending and hiring, as well as a long list of other fiscally conservative and business-oriented causes.

 * * *

Among those who advocated on behalf of the referendum, Martha T. McCluskey, a professor of law, argued in a statement that the measure promotes transparency and independence in the university’s political activities. The chambers of commerce, she added, “should not use public university resources or [the University at Buffalo's] name and prestige to promote external private political interests.”

Read the full article here.

Professor McCluskey welcomes hearing from law faculty with expertise on any of the legal issues involved.  Her email is mcclusk@buffalo.edu

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Politics | Leave a comment

“Are You a Feminist or a Womanist?” Staceyann Chin Responds

Staceyann Chin responds with poetry: “I am never any one thing or the other….”

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and the Arts | Leave a comment

Bank of Montreal Visiting Scholar in Women’s Studies 2012-2013 Academic Year

The Institute of Women’s Studies at the University of Ottawa is inviting applications for its Bank of Montreal Visiting Scholar in Women’s Studies for 2012-2013. The purpose of this fund is to attract highly qualified researchers working on women’s issues. The Visiting Scholar’s stay should be from three (3) to six (6) months within the university’s academic year, from September to April. The recipient will receive a maximum of $3,000 which may be used to supplement research and/or travel expenses. Scholars with alternative funding will be considered. The Visiting Scholar will be required to present her ongoing research project in conferences and/or seminars and to interact with the community of students and colleagues. Additional information will be provided on request.

The Institute of Women’s Studies invites applications from Canadian and non-Canadian scholars, both tenured and untenured faculty, and from post-doctoral, independent scholars who are pursuing critical feminist research. Individuals must have a Ph.D. to be considered for this position.

Applications should include a curriculum vitae, a detailed statement of the research project, copies of recent publications, the dates of the proposed stay at the University of Ottawa and the names of two referees.

Please forward to:

Selection Committee
Bank of Montreal Visiting Scholar in Women’s Studies
Institute of Women’s Studies, University of Ottawa
30 Stewart, room 101, Ottawa, Ontario, KIN 6N5 Canada
Telephone : (613) 562-5791
Fax : (613) 562-5994
E-mail : mcharbo@uOttawa.ca

The NEW closing date for submitting applications is 29 February 2012.

For more information, please consult the website here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation, Fellowships and Funding Opportunities | Leave a comment

Why Do Some Gay Men Hate Women?

Writer Ryan O’Connell asks What’s the Deal with Misogynistic Gay Men? over here at Thought Catalog.  And he’s not even talking about the gay men who overtly don’t like women (don’t want to work with them, socialize with them, etc.).  O’Connell is talking about gay men who like to be surrounded by women.  Here’s an excerpt:

I don’t understand gay men who hate women. Most of them aren’t even aware of their hatred, which makes it difficult to acknowledge and discuss the misogyny. They actually believe that they adore them. “OMG, can’t go anywhere without my girls! What would I do without them!” But, in reality, they’re used as punching bags. They tease them mercilessly and cut down their appearance while the friend just sits back and laughs, clearly uncomfortable by the insults but used to the unhealthy dynamic by now. * * *

What frustrates me is how socially acceptable it is for gay men to treat women like crap. People assume that just because you don’t want to get into a woman’s pants, you’re inherently a feminist. But, what do you know, that’s not true. There are a myriad of ways to disrespect women that don’t involve ploys to get them into bed. Calling them bitches and whores as a “joke” is one of them. (Seriously, hearing a drunk gay man scream and shout to their girlfriend, “You’re such a filthy whore!” is like nails on a chalkboard to me. I just can’t.)

Read the full post here.

This a topic that I haven’t seen much written about, and isn’t discussed all that openly, at least among my feminist friends and colleagues.  Is feminist silence motivated by a misplaced sense of solidarity?  Or are women not too eager to throw stones?  After all, women — even feminist women — aren’t immune from woman-hating.  But then again, misogyny is easer to spot in others than in ourselves.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Sociolinguistics | Leave a comment

CFP: ClassCrits V November 16-17, 2012

CALL FOR PAPERS & PARTICIPATION

ClassCrits V 

From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream 

Sponsored by

University of Wisconsin Law School &

The Institute for Legal Studies, University of Wisconsin Law School 

Madison, WI.    *     November 16-17, 2012 

Keynote Speaker: Professor Erik Olin Wright, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin.

Proposal Deadline: February 17, 2012

This workshop, the fifth meeting of ClassCrits, takes on class and the American dream as its theme. The most quintessentially American trait may be our capacity to look past current misfortune and imagine a brighter future.  Americans love a “rags to riches” story and have long believed that hard work and determination will pay off in the long run. Two years into a sluggish “recovery” from the Great Recession, however, many Americans have lost some of that earnest optimism. Faced with persistent unemployment, a nationwide foreclosure crisis, deep cuts to state and local budgets, and declining state support for public education, Americans are questioning the promise of upward mobility. Indeed falling backwards is now a recognized phenomenon affecting more and more of the “middle class,” arguably blurring the distinctions between the “middle class,” the “working classes” and “the poor.” But roused by economic insecurity and the political assault on workers’ rights, “ordinary” people from Madison to Zuccotti Park have taken to the streets to voice their dissent. Taking on the slogan “we are the 99%,” the protest movement has launched a national dialogue about income, wealth and structural inequality, race, gender and class divisions in society, and, fundamentally, what it will take to reclaim our vision of a good life.  From Madison to Zuccotti Park: Confronting Class and Reclaiming the American Dream will therefore bring together scholars, economists, activists, policymakers, and others to critically examine both the relationships between and the complexities of class and inequality.

Conference organizers invite panel proposals and paper presentations that speak to this year’s theme as well as to general ClassCrits themes.

In addition, conference organizers extend a special invitation to junior scholars to submit proposals for works in progress. Each work in progress will be commented upon by a senior scholar as well as other scholars in a small, supportive working session.

Possible Topics:

  •  Constructing & Deconstructing the 99%
  • The Vanishing(ed) Middle-Class (family, housing, health care, education, income, employment, other)
  • Social Mobility—Falling Backwards
  • Gender Dynamics in Economic Downturns and Recoveries
  • The Role of Women & Women’s Issues in Protest Movements
  • Anti-Poverty Strategies
  • Mapping a Way Forward (strategies for change in general)
  • Political Failure (tax policy, immigration, labor & employment, welfare, other)
  • Politics 2012–Political Opportunity?
  • Structural Inequality (law, public health, education, other)
  • Conscious and Unconscious Animus Against Poor People (immigration, criminalization, family, other)
  • Spatial Inequality (segregation, rurality, surveillance)
  • W(h)ither the Social Safety Net? (welfare, bankruptcy, housing, food, other)
  • Class and Inequality: How are they different?
  • Exploring the Racial & Inter-Racial Impacts of Economic Downturns and Poverty
  • International Social & Economic Equality/Mobility (shared lessons and lessons to be learned)
  • Human Rights or Civil Rights?
  • The Great Tech Divide (in terms of race, gender, class, location [suburbs, cities, rural areas])

In addition, conference organizers invite panel proposals that speak to the general themes of ClassCrits, including:

  •  The legal and cultural project of constructing inequalities of all kinds as natural, normal, and necessary
  • The relationships among economic, racial, and gender inequality
  • The development of new methods with which to analyze and criticize economics and law (beyond traditional “law and economics”)
  • The relationship between material systems and institutions and cultural systems and institutions.

ClassCrits is a network of scholars and activists interested in critical analysis of law and economic relations. The global economic crisis, along with growing economic inequality and insecurity, suggests it is time to explore alternatives to the neoclassical or “free market” economic paradigm, often identified with the U.S. “Law and Economics” movement. We aim to revive discussions of questions of class pushed to the margins or relegated to the shadowy past, considering the possible meaning and relevance of economic class to the contemporary context. We also hope to better integrate the rich diversity of economic methods and theories into law by exploring and engaging non-neoclassical and heterodox economics. The name “ClassCrits” reflects our interest in focusing on economics through the lens of critical legal scholarship movements, such as critical legal studies, critical feminist theory, critical race theory, LatCrit, and queer theory. That is, we start with the assumption that economics in law is inextricably political and fundamentally tied to questions of systemic status-based subordination.

LOGISTICS:

The venue for the gathering is The University of Wisconsin Law School. The workshop will begin with continental breakfast on Friday November 16 and continue through the afternoon of Saturday November 17.  Arrangements are being made for conference hotels. Please check our website www.classcrits.org for further updates or email the conference planners.

FEES:

Attendees are responsible for their own travel and lodging expenses.

CONFERENCE PLANNING COMMITTEE:  (Contact any member with Questions).

  • Tonya Brito, The University of Wisconsin Law School, tlbrito@wisc.edu
  • Martha McCluskey, University at Buffalo School of Law, mcclusk@buffalo.edu
  • Ezra Rosser, American University, Washington College of Law, erosser@wcl.american.edu
  • Angela Harris, UC Davis School of Law, apharris@ucdavis.edu
  • Athena Mutua, University at Buffalo School of Law, admutua@buffalo.edu
  • Teresa Miller, University at Buffalo School of Law, tmiller@buffalo.edu
  • Danielle Kie Hart, Southwestern Law School, dhart@swlaw.edu
  • Lucille Jewel, John Marshall Law School, ljewel@johnmarshall.edu
  •  Brishen Rogers, Temple University, Beasley School of Law, brogers@temple.edu
  • Lisa R. Pruitt, UC Davis School of Law, lrpruitt@ucdavis.edu
  • Saru Matambanadzo, Tulane University Law School, smatamba@tulane.edu

DEADLINE:

Please submit your proposal by email to classcrits@gmail.com by February 17, 2012.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Socioeconomic Class | Leave a comment

Issues in Legal Scholarship — Focus on Feminism

Out of an on-line colloquium organized by Kathy Abrams (I guess you had to be one of the cool kids to be invited; I don’t remember seeing a call), there’s the latest Issues in Legal Scholarship, with these fascinating contributions:

  • Martha Chamallas, Backlash, Covering, and the State of Feminist Legal Theory
  • Clare Huntington, Feminism’s Family
  • Kathryn Abrams, Introduction: The Distinctive Energies of “Normal Science”
  • Angela P. Harris, What Ever Happened to Feminist Legal Theory?
  • Brenda Cossman, Where Did Feminism Go? Reflections from a Slightly Lapsed Feminist
  • Herma Hill Kay, What I Learned About Feminism From the Early Women Law Professors
  • Gowri Ramachandran, Pulling the Ladder Up Behind You: Feminism and Family
  • Joan C. Williams, Tough Guise
  • Berta Esperanza Hernandez-Truyol, On Que(e)rying Feminism: Reclaiming the F Word
  • Marc Spindelman, Feminism Without Feminism
  • Martha T. McCluskey, How Money for Legal Scholarship Disadvantages Feminism
  • Katharine B. Silbaugh, Architecture of Legal Feminism

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal Scholarship | Leave a comment

Brown Girl in the Ring (Show Me Your Motion, Not Your Papers)

Brown girl in the ring

Tra la la la la

There’s a brown girl in the ring

Tra la la la la la la

Brown girl in the ring

Tra la la la la

She looks like a sugar in a plum

Plum plum

Show me your motion

Tra la la la la

Come on show me your motion

Tra la la la la la la

Show me your motion

Tra la la la la

She looks like a sugar in a plum

–Traditional Caribbean children’s song and game

A recent news article has me pondering national belonging in a big way.

A then 14-year-old United States born, non-Spanish speaking African American girl named Jakadrien Turner was erroneously deported to Colombia in 2010.   Ms. Turner was, according to news accounts, arrested for shoplifting in Houston, Texas. Though the facts are unclear, U.S. authorities assert that Turner identified herself as an undocumented alien from Colombia. Turner pled guilty to the shoplifting charges and was turned over to federal immigration authorities who sent her before an immigration magistrate where she was ordered deported.  Immigration and Customs Enforcement then asked the Colombian consulate to issue travel documents, which the consulate issued after interviewing the teenager.  Turner was then transported to Bogotá. Once in Colombia Turner was apparently given a work permit and released.  After an odyssey of over a year, Turner was recently reunited with her family in the United States.

In their defense, United States officials have suggested that Turner’s case is rare. However, the fact is that wrongful deportations are not as rare as is often asserted. It is probably the case that many hundreds of people, mostly people of color, are erroneously deported every year. Many of these deportations are of non-citizens whose deportations were based on improper grounds.  For many of these people, there is no remedy once they have been removed. There is no such barrier to return for American citizens who have been wrongfully deported, thankfully.  Still, wrongful deportation can be the source of numerous harms, and U.S. citizens are victims far more often than is typically imagined. According to an amicus brief filed by the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild in Castro v. United States, “the problem of detention and deportation of U.S. Citizens is so widespread that citizens may even be detained and deported on a daily basis.” According to a recent article by Jacqueline Stevens of Northwestern University, data suggests that since 2003 more than 20,000 United States citizens have been detained or deported as aliens

(read the rest of the post here)

-Lolita Buckner Inniss

(cross-post from Ain’t I a Feminist Legal Scholar, Too?)

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Immigration | Leave a comment

CFP: Social Justice Feminism, Oct. 26-27, 2012 Univ. of Cincinnati

Call for Papers 

“Social Justice Feminism”

University of Cincinnati College of Law

October 26-27, 2012

Keynote Speakers 

Patricia Hill Collins, Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland; Charles Phelps Taft Distinguished Emeritus Professor of Sociology, University of Cincinnati

 Anika Rahman, President and CEO of the Ms. Foundation for Women 

The University of Cincinnati College of Law’s Center for Race, Gender, and Social Justice seeks submissions for its upcoming 2012 conference “Social Justice Feminism.”  For more information about the conference, please click here.

What is Social Justice Feminism?  It is the type of work feminist activists on the ground say that they want to do.  This desire for “social justice feminism” (SJF) emerged from a three-years’ long conversation among women leaders from national groups, grassroots organizations, academia, and beyond (the New Women’s Movement Initiative) who gathered to address dissonance in the women’s movement, particularly dissatisfaction with the movement’s emphasis on women privileged on account of their race, class, or sexuality.  In 2010, Kristin Kalsem and Verna L. Williams of the University of Cincinnati College of Law published an article, “Social Justice Feminism,” that takes initial steps at broadly defining SJF as that which is productive, constructive, and healing.  Moving from practice to theory, it suggests a new way of articulating and understanding the feminist work that is being done in this current stage of feminist jurisprudence, after the path-breaking interventions of anti-essentialism and intersectionality.  The article also sets forth methodological tools for “doing social justice feminism.” 

“Social Justice Feminism” was written to advance the conversation that has already begun, both in the world of practice as evidenced by the work of the New Women’s Movement Initiative, as well as the world of feminist legal theory.  The upcoming conference  is intended to continue and expand the conversation.  We are seeking papers from academics who are interested in practice and activists who are interested in theory.  Possible panels include: 

  • A social justice feminist approach to women and prison
  • Critical Race Feminism and SJF
  • The intersections of SJF and environmental justice
  • History and reproductive justice
  • New approaches to domestic violence activism
  • SJF and criminal justice 

Deadline: April 1, 2012.  We invite submissions of abstracts for individual papers, as well as complete panels.  Send paper abstracts of no more that 500 words and a short biographical statement to lawsonmn@ucmail.uc.edu.  In the subject or “re” line of your submission, please type: SJF conference submission.  Include your full contact information, including an email, phone number, and mailing address where you can be reached.  We will notify presenters of selected papers by June 1, 2012.

If you have any questions, please contact Professor Kristin Kalsem at kristin.kalsem@uc.edu.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation | Leave a comment

Conference Announcement — Women, The Charter, and CEDAW in the 21st Century: Taking Stock and Moving Forward

From Bita Amani and Kathleen Lahey, Co-directors, Feminist Legal Studies Queen’s:

Women, The Charter, and CEDAW in the 21st Century: Taking Stock and Moving Forward

March 2-3, 2012
Queen’s University Faculty of Law
Kingston Ontario

This conference is open to anyone interested in equality and women’s issues,
including students, faculty, members of community organizations, workers,
policy analysts, managers and administrators, government employees, and
professionals.

Please register in advance with Melissa Howlett at melissa.howlett@queensu.ca.
There are no registration fees for students, those on low incomes, or voluntary
workers; those who can afford to contribute toward the food expenses of this
conference are asked to pay a $50 registration fee upon arrival. Information on
conference hotel rates can be obtained from Ms. Howlett.

Details of the program, speakers, and schedule can be found here

The focus of this conference is on identifying and strategizing solutions to
the many challenges women currently face — from financial and economic
discrimination to racism, violence, and lack of social, cultural, political,
and environmental policies that meet women’s needs. Speakers with diverse
backgrounds of engagement in legal and legally-related issues from across
Canada and internationally will address these issues over the course of the two
days of this conference.

Contact information is provided on the above webpage, or contact Bita Amani or
Kathleen Lahey with any questions.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Leave a comment

Hadassah-Brandeis Institute Scholarly Residency in Gender, Culture, Religion and Law

From the FLP mailbox:

The HBI (Hadassah-Brandeis Institute) at Brandeis University is accepting applications for our spring 2013 seminar focusing on Gender, Culture, Religion and the Law.    Scholars working on exploring conflicts between women’s claims to gender equality and legal norms justified in terms of religious and cultural traditions, and those examining the status of women under religious law, either within a single tradition, or using cross-cultural or interdisciplinary approaches are invited to apply for this semester long residency.

Deadline for applications: March 15, 2012

For further details, see here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Fellowships and Funding Opportunities | Leave a comment

Feminist Research Resource at Barnard

The Barnard College Library has a large collection of feminist ‘zines.  The Barnard Zine Library has its own webpage (here), with finding guides (see here), bibliographies (see here) and teaching resources (here).  The teaching guides could be adapted easily for a Feminist Legal Theory course, especially for a unit on third-wave feminism.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Law Teaching | Leave a comment

Clay Shirky’s “A Rant About Women” From Two Years Ago

Read it here. Below is an excerpt:

“… Some of the most important opportunities we have are in two-sided markets: education and employment, contracts and loans, grants and prizes. And the institutions that offer these opportunities operate in an environment where accurate information is hard to come by. One of their main sources of judgment is asking the candidate directly: Tell us why we should admit you. Tell us why we should hire you. Tell us why we should give you a grant. Tell us why we should promote you.

In these circumstances, people who don’t raise their hands don’t get called on, and people who raise their hands timidly get called on less. Some of this is because assertive people get noticed more easily, but some of it is because raising your hand is itself a high-cost signal that you are willing to risk public failure in order to try something.

That in turn correlates with many of the skills the candidate will need to actually do the work — to recruit colleagues and raise money, to motivate participants and convince skeptics, to persevere in the face of both obstacles and ridicule. Institutions assessing the fitness of candidates, in other words, often select self-promoters because self-promotion is tied to other characteristics needed for success.

It’s tempting to imagine that women could be forceful and self-confident without being arrogant or jerky, but that’s a false hope, because it’s other people who get to decide when they think you’re a jerk, and trying to stay under that threshold means giving those people veto power over your actions. To put yourself forward as someone good enough to do interesting things is, by definition, to expose yourself to all kinds of negative judgments, and as far as I can tell, the fact that other people get to decide what they think of your behavior leaves only two strategies for not suffering from those judgments: not doing anything, or not caring about the reaction. … ”

 

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Technology, Feminism and the Workplace, The Overrepresentation of Men, The Underrepresentation of Women | Leave a comment

The Origins of Sexual Freedom

Faramerz Dabhoiwala breaks down the topic in The Origins of Sex: A History of the First Sexual Revolution, a book forthcoming (April 2012) from Oxford University Press.  Here’s the publisher’s description:

A man admits that, when drunk, he tried to have sex with an eighteen-year-old girl; she is arrested and denies they had intercourse, but finally begs God’s forgiveness. Then she is publicly hanged alongside her attacker. These events took place in 1644, in Boston, where today they would be viewed with horror. How–and when–did such a complete transformation of our culture’s attitudes toward sex occur?

In The Origins of Sex, Faramerz Dabhoiwala provides a landmark history, one that will revolutionize our understanding of the origins of sexuality in modern Western culture. For millennia, sex had been strictly regulated by the Church, the state, and society, who vigorously and brutally attempted to punish any sex outside of marriage. But by 1800, everything had changed. Drawing on vast research–from canon law to court cases, from novels to pornography, not to mention the diaries and letters of people great and ordinary–Dabhoiwala shows how this dramatic change came about, tracing the interplay of intellectual trends, religious and cultural shifts, and politics and demographics. The Enlightenment led to the presumption that sex was a private matter; that morality could not be imposed; that men, not women, were the more lustful gender. Moreover, the rise of cities eroded community-based moral policing, and religious divisions undermined both church authority and fear of divine punishment. Sex became a central topic in poetry, drama, and fiction; diarists such as Samuel Pepys obsessed over it. In the 1700s, it became possible for a Church of Scotland leader to commend complete sexual liberty for both men and women. Arguing that the sexual revolution that really counted occurred long before the cultural movement of the 1960s, Dabhoiwala offers readers an engaging and wholly original look at the Western world’s relationship to sex.

Read the full description here.  In the pages of the Guardian (U.K.), Dabhoiwala writes:

It’s no accident that all these early celebrations of the new sexual world were voiced by white, upper-class men. In practice, sexual liberty was limited in important ways. The bastardy laws continued to apply to the labouring classes: their morals remained a public matter. The new permissiveness towards “natural” freedoms also led to a sharper definition and abhorrence of supposedly “unnatural” behavior.  * * *

Yet the general advance of sexual freedom and the expansion of urban life also fostered the development of an increasingly assertive homosexual sub-culture. Some of the most remarkable utterances of the 18th century were the first principled defences of same-sex behaviour as natural, universal and harmless. * * *

Attitudes towards women’s sexuality underwent similarly dramatic shifts. The idea that sexual freedom was as natural and desirable for women as for men was born in the 18th century. By the early 19th century, many feminists, socialists and other progressive thinkers on both sides of the Atlantic decried marriage and advocated free love as a means to the emancipation of women and the creation of a more just society.

Read the full Guardian piece here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Recommended Books | Leave a comment

LGBT Legal Symposium at the University of Mississippi School of Law – March 23, 2012

From student organizers at the University of Mississippi School of Law:

The University of Mississippi School of Law will be hosting the 2nd Annual LGBT Legal Symposium on March 23rd, 2012 at the Robert C. Khayat Law Center. Like last year, the Symposium will feature well known names within the LGBT legal community, and present classes on topics such as Transgender Marriages, Wills and Estates, Custody Issues, Cyber-Bullying and GSA Formation.  D’Arcy Kemnitz, Executive Director of the National LGBT Bar Association, will be moderating a panel on Ethics and Diversity in the Legal Profession.  4.5 CLE credits, which includes 1 Ethics Hour, are available for attending attorneys.

The Symposium may be attended either in person, or we are able to offer 25 seats for attendance through live streaming video over the Internet. Registration for either type of attendance is $125 (faculty and students attend free of charge). Lunch is included in the registration fee. To register, please print and fill out the registration form and return to address indicated on the form along with a check or money order for the registration fee.

The Registration Form and Agenda are on the conference Facebook page.  More info also available from olemiss.outlaw@gmail.com.

If you’re in that area of the country on March 23, please consider attending to support the students who are making this CLE available in Mississippi.

-Bridget Crawford

 

New layer…

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Leave a comment

CFP: IMPRINTS Virtual Journal of the International Models Project on Women’s Rights

From the FLP mailbox, this CFP:

The International Models Project on Women’s Rights (IMPOWR) is an initiative of the ABA Section of International Law and our goal is to establish a global, collaborative research database on women’s rights under law. It promises to play a unique role in supporting the worldwide implementation of the principles underlying the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

Specifically, IMPOWR aims to:

  • Provide original, editable, searchable and comparable content summarizing current gender equality law as well as the legal reform and enforcement efforts taking place in over 185 countries on 40 specific topics.
  • Serve as a hub of links to numerous other databases, providing a uniquely comprehensive and navigable research tool for primary and secondary source materials on laws, legal resources, law reform projects, reports and assessments of gender equality under the law around the world.
  • Showcase expert analyses of gender equality legal issues and provide models of law reform through original articles and presentations.
  • Link stakeholders, policy makers, legislators, jurists, financial institutions, NGOs, non-profits, research institutions, project directors, law enforcement professionals, social workers, news organizations, legal experts, law schools, law students and volunteers around the globe to a powerfully informed community focused on promoting gender equality and development.

In support of our mission, we are keenly interested in publishing articles and papers in IMPOWR Imprints that address a broad range of issues relating to women’s rights and with a global perspective.

Our editorial requirements are less formal than law review or scholarly journals and you can view them here.  We also welcome student submissions. For more information about us, please visit our website at www.impowr.org.

There is short video that describes the project here.

IMPOWR’s website debuted at the Law Library of Congress last year. Clip below.

-Bridget Crawford

 

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal Scholarship, Legal Profession, Sisters In Other Nations | Comments Off

He’s Elmo and He Knows It

Other than the misplaced apostrophe in the subtitles (“kid’s look at these crayons”), I love it.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | 1 Comment

Coming to Social Consciousness Through Hip-Hop

Over at Rhymes and Reasons: The Stories of Hip-Hop, Chicago-based community organizer Jasson Perez talks about one song’s influence on his intellectual and emotional development:

I picked Tupac, “Keep Ya Head Up,” mainly because, well,  it’s a great song, and its probably one of the first songs that brought me to the level of consciousness that I have today, and like why I care about movement-building, why I care about social, racial and economic justice as I do and why I care about, like, women’s rights as much as I do, and it also had a huge impact on me raising my own daughter.

Listen to the podcast here.

Jasson Perez also references Outkast, LL Cool J, Little Brother, among others.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and the Arts | Comments Off

Franchesca Ramsey on “What Happens When You’re a Black Girl on the Internet”

Franchesca Ramsey is the creator and featured performer in the short video “Sh*t White Girls Say…to Black Girls” (itself a spoof on the viral”Sh*it Girls Say…” video).  Ms. Ramsey has her own blog (here) and a You Tube channel (here).  In an interview with the Village Voice, Ms. Ramsey describes the reaction to the video:

Some people are upset, but the people who are upset don’t really get it and don’t understand what I do. You need to know who I am to understand the video, and if they don’t watch my other videos, they might not get me. I’ve had a few people saying “You hate white people!” But my fiancé is white, most of my closest friends are white. I was literally hopping on a meme and trying to make it relevant to me. A lot of people relate to it, but some people don’t. That’s what happens when you’re a black girl on the internet. I’ve done this for long enough that I’m used to it.

Feminist Philosophers has a round-up (here) of links responding to the video:

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Culture, Race and Racism | 1 Comment

The Loss of Sexual Innocence: Supreme Court of Guam Finds Trial Court Erred in Limiting Cross-Examination of Child Rape Victim

A defendant is on trial for criminal sexual conduct based upon acts that he allegedly committed against a 10 year-old victim. Previously, a forensic examination of the alleged victim revealed scar tissue on her hymen. Before trial, the defendant failed to comply with the procedure for admitting evidence under an exception to the rape shield rule, but he later asks to introduce evidence of another sexual crime committed against the alleged victim under one of these exceptions. The trial court refuses to allow defense counsel to cross-examine the alleged victim regarding evidence of this other sexual crime, but it does allow him to present such evidence through other witnesses. Sounds like a reasonable compromise, right? In fact, maybe the court shouldn’t even have allowed the introduction of this evidence at all, right? Well, not according to the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of the Territory of Guam in Guam v. Ojeda, 2011 WL 6937376 (Guam Terr. 2011).

Continue reading

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary | Comments Off

“Are You My Mentor?” On Giving and Receiving Career Guidance

(c) Random House Bertelsmann

One of my favorite books as a child was Are You My Mother? by P.D. Eastman.  It’s part of the “Beginner Books” series that includes the Dr. Seuss titles.

Fans will remember the basic storyline: a baby bird hatches while its mother is absent from the nest.  The baby bird goes looking for its mother, asking various animals and vehicles met on the journey, “Are you my mother?”  Ultimately the baby bird encounters a power shovel (or steam shovel; I don’t remember which).  This scares the baby bird into uttering, “You are not my mother!  You are a SNORT!  I want my mother!”  Then the power shovel lifts the bird back into its nest, where mother and baby are reunited.

When I first started teaching in 2003, I felt a bit like that baby bird, looking at the people around me and thinking (to myself), “Is that my mentor? Who is my mentor? Are you my mentor?” Like many folks starting out in a variety of careers, I had the notion that the day would come when I would have the one, true, ideal mentor.

But most searches for THE ONE — in any context — are futile.  Starting out in law teaching and still now, my m.o. is to ask individual colleagues — local and national — for specific guidance and help. What was your process for writing your book proposal? How have you dealt with this kind of problem in the classroom?  Would you read my Introduction and tell me if the thesis is clear?  Would you mind sitting in on my class and giving me feedback about this particular concern of mine?  I have received gracious assistance every time I have asked.

As I got more settled in law teaching, I  started asking other questions, too: Do you have any interest in this speaking engagement that I have been offered but cannot accept?  Could I introduce you to Professor X, whom I met at a conference and to whom I mentioned your work? How are things going with your writing?

(c) Random House Bertelsmann

Taking the long view, I think of each of these interactions as mentorship-in-action.  Some questions led to nothing more than quick conversations. Some  turned into continuing conversations.  Some turned into co-authorships.  Some turned into professional relationships that I count among my most important.

The baby bird received a literal lift up from an unexpected source, but only after engaging with the steam shovel.  So, too, must we reach out for guidance, honest feedback or a sympathetic ear in a search for mentorship.  And to be the helpful power shovel — to give a lift to someone else — we need to be available and willing to share our abilities and attention.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminists in Academia | Comments Off

More On the Harris Case

I recently received an email from Tim Casey of Legal Momentum regarding the Crystal Harris divorce case, about which I blogged recently. He enclosed a report prepared by the Certified Family Law Specialists Committee of the San Diego County Bar Association, which, I think, clarifies the legal situation the judge found himself in with regard to spousal support in that case. I am posting the report with the consent of the report’s preparers. I thank them and Mr. Casey for bringing it to my attention and sharing it with me and this blog’s readers.

__________________________

 RE: In Re the Marriage of HARRIS, Crystal J. & Shawn

San Diego Superior Court Case #: DN106123

 

The Certified Family Law Specialists Committee of the San Diego County Bar Association [CFLS] has been made aware of certain news accounts that relate to the legal proceedings in the above referenced matter and orders made by the Honorable Gregory W. Pollack, Judge of the San Diego County Superior Court.

 

Family law is an area of intense interest and importance to the public.  CFLS takes pride in the work that we do and the difficult tasks that are given to the judicial officers who serve in our courts.  CFLS, as a committee of the San Diego County Bar Association, has provided resources and support for many years to the victims of domestic violence.  Domestic violence is a serious national problem, which threatens the safety and well-being of thousands of men, women and children every year.  CFLS expresses its sympathy to Crystal Harris for the suffering she endured at the hands of her husband, Shawn, and its concerns for all victims of domestic violence.

 

The integrity of our judicial system, especially as it relates to family law matters, is of the highest importance.  Because this particular case has generated controversy, and questions have been raised concerning court orders, CFLS intends this statement to correct any misinterpretations that may occur as a result of the misunderstandings of the legal process or what occurred when Judge Pollack, who is ethically prohibited from commenting on this case, made certain orders.

 

  1.  LEGAL FEES AND COSTS

 

Reports have circulated that Crystal, who was severely battered by Shawn, was ordered to pay Shawn’s legal fees in the amount of $47,000.00.  CFLS reviewed relevant portions of the court file which indicates that this was a protracted and complicated family law case.

 

California Family Code 2030 requires the Court to insure that each party has access to legal representation by making an order of legal fees payable by one party to the other when one party has superior financial resources.  Shawn Harris had requested an award for fees he had incurred.  Before that request was heard by the Court, the parties reached an agreement by stipulation.  Their attorneys drafted a written stipulation, signed by both parties and their attorneys.  The Agreement set forth terms by which Crystal Harris agreed to pay $47,000 of Shawn’s fees.  That $47,000 amount was offset by a $20,841.00 restitution payment that Shawn was ordered by the criminal court to pay to Crystal for the battery that he inflicted on her.  As a result, Crystal, by stipulation, agreed to pay Shawn’s legal fees of $26,159.00 at the rate of $250.00/month.  Interest is not to run on the balance due unless Crystal Harris misses a monthly payment.

The eventual order of legal fees to be paid by Crystal Harris to her husband was based solely upon the aforementioned written agreement, which was signed by Crystal Harris and Shawn Harris and approved by their respective attorneys.  Judge Pollack approved that agreement and entered it as an order pursuant to the parties’ joint request.  There is nothing in the court record that reflects any orders that require Crystal Harris to contribute to or pay any part of Shawn’s criminal defense fees.

 

 

  1. SPOUSAL AND CHILD SUPPORT

 

Child Support in the state of California is set by a “guideline”, which takes into account each party’s income and the timeshare with the children.  This is a mandatory formula, from which the Court may not deviate except upon a showing of special circumstances that warrant a deviation from guideline child support.

 

In setting spousal support, the Court must consider a number of factors, including the income and education of each party.  The factors are described in Family Code section 4320.  The Court must also consider, in setting spousal support, the fact that Mr. Harris committed domestic violence against Mrs. Harris.

 

At an initial hearing that was held prior to Shawn’s criminal conviction, the Court considered guideline support using Shawn’s income of $400/month and Crystal’s income of $11,000/month.  Using suggested amounts from a California guideline program, the Court considered that spousal support could be reasonably set at over $2,700 per month, payable by Crystal to Shawn.  Judge Pollack considered the Domestic Violence that Shawn committed against Crystal.   Judge Pollack then ordered temporary spousal support payable by Crystal to Shawn in the amount of $1,000 per month.  That spousal support sum ($1,000/month) was offset by the $60.00 per month Shawn was ordered to pay to Crystal for child support.

 

At trial, and after Shawn had been criminally convicted, Judge Pollack reduced spousal support to zero.  The Court advised Crystal of California law regarding spousal support, specifically, that a change in circumstances (e.g., Shawn’s release from prison) could result in a motion to modify support.  Judge Pollack did not have the authority, under current California law, to terminate Shawn’s rights to seek spousal support at a later date due to the length of this marriage.  The Court did not order that Crystal resume paying spousal support to Shawn upon his release from prison.  Until and unless Shawn files a motion in which he requests spousal support, and the Court, after hearing evidence, makes a future support order, Crystal will pay no spousal support to Shawn.  It was appropriate for Judge Pollack to advise Crystal of the possibility that Shawn could, under current California law, make a request in the future for spousal support.

 

____________________________________________

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Feminism and Law, Legal Profession | Comments Off

Announcing Two New Issues of “Women in Judaism”

From the FLP mailbox, this notice of two new issues of the interdisciplinary journal Women in Judaism:

Vol. 8:1 features:

Articles

Voicing a New Midrash: Women’s Holocaust Writing as Jewish Feminist Response
Deidre Butler

Reading Jewish Identity, Spiritual Alienation, and Reform Judaism Through the Veil of Abstract Self-Hatred, Racial Degeneration, and Anti-Semitism in Julia Frankau’s Dr. Phillips: A Maida Vale Idyll
Luke Devine

Essays

Madam Potiphar’s Boy Toy: No Laughing Matter
David J. Zucker

Biographical Essays

The Correspondence Between Kadya Molodowsky and Rokhl Korn
Zelda Kahn Newman

Book Reviews by Rivka Chaya Schiller, Evelyn Torton Beck, Jeanne Law Bohannon, Sandra Slater, Judith S. Pinnolis, Rachel E. Silverman, Sonia Zylberberg, and Katherine Romanow.

Fiction- Short Stories Brenda Naomi Herzberg

Fiction-Poetry Yala Korwin, Arlene L. Mandell

Vol. 8:2 features:

Articles

Outline of a Gender Conflict: Notes on an Early Story by Dvora Baron
Einat Baram Eshel

Yichud Rachel and Leah: Same-Sex Kabbalistic/Poetic Hermeneutics
Nitsa Kann

Essays

The Goddess, Syncretism, and Patriarchy: Evolution and Extinction of the Goddess during the Creation of Patriarchy in Ancient Israel
Ramona Wanlass

Book Reviews  by  Jane Enkin, Rivka Chaya Schiller, Aviva Atlani, Emily A. Filler, Tamara Mann Tweel, Devi Mays, Phil Gold, Maria Velazquez, and Gabriel Constans

Fiction-Poetry Lillian Bouzane, Pat Hurshell, Barbara Hantman and Carol V. Davis

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Religion, From the FLP mailbox | Comments Off

The Incoherence of Queer Theory and Its Relationship to Law

In the pages of The Chronicle (here), William Germano (Dean and Professor at Cooper Union Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences) offers his reflections on the end of Series Q, a book and journal line published by the Duke University Press. The Duke U Press blog described Series Q succinctly in its notice (here) of the death of Eve Sedgwick:

More than just a Duke author, Sedgwick helped to define the Press as we went through major editorial changes in the 1990s. In 1992, along with Michèle Aina Barale, Michael Moon, and Jonathan Goldberg, she founded the influential Series Q, helping to found the discipline of queer theory. Under her guidance, Duke Press has become a leader in that field; Series Q now includes 42 books.

Apparently, the Duke U Press has decided to end the series.

William Germano; image source: flickr.com

Dean Germano, who is the former publishing director at Routledge, writes this about the genre of academic publishing that might loosely fall under the heading of “LGBT Studies”:

Someone once remarked to me that scholarly publishing in gay studies was a conflict between the nerdy and the naughty. A lot of history of sexuality and a lot of philosophizing, often producing books that were too dense for the general reader with whom their authors were eager to communicate. “Don’t overthink it,” someone might have said back in those heady days of gender theory. But it seems that in academia, we sometimes have to overthink before we can think. Complex thinking and complex writing have been tools of legitimation in every academic field. That may be one of queer theory’s unintended lessons.

What else have we learned? If a field remains, it isn’t a coherent one. By one metric—the presence of robust publishing programs—”gay studies” now marks only a historical trace. You’d be hard-pressed to find a bookstore with a first-rate selection in the discipline, and compared with 1993 you’d have to look a lot harder to find a good bookstore, period—except online.

We’ve also lost the annual gay and lesbian studies conferences, energizing events that brought together scholars and editors eager to exchange ideas. There was something exhilarating about the Q factor. * *  *

Gay studies had a good run. One could even argue that the project of gay and lesbian history and queer theory was so successful that it brought about its own dissolution, as academic studies moved from a strict Q-ness to big-tent Q-ness. Like Lady Gaga’s embrace of us, her little “monsters,” the Q factor expanded to make room for all kinds of difference. Difference itself was queer, and in academic circles, it seemed less special to be L, or G, or B, or T, or just plain Q.

But while book markets say one thing, life sometimes says another. The end of a series is hardly the end of a subject or of a need. As I write this, gay people can get married in six states, the District of Columbia, a few Indian tribes, and The New York Times. But look at the rest of the paper, almost any day. Another political candidate wagers his appeal on a campaign against gay people. Another student is vilified for being Q. Outside the United States, even worse things have been happening. Can scholars, writers, activists, and ordinary, decent people change these things? Do we still need ideas and arguments and histories and plays—people writing words down, people reading them—to move us—fairly, humanely—forward? We do, we do.

There’s lots of food for thought in Dean Germano’s piece.  (The full version is here.)

Although I don’t write in the area of queer studies, Dean Germano’s reflections raise some larger questions that might have relevance to legal scholarship.  Here are three of the issues that caught my eye, about which I’d like to think more:

(1) What is the relationship of “complex thinking and complex writing” to academic “legitimation” of new fields? Is complexity a bad thing for the study of law?

(2) What is “incoherence” as Germano understands it, and is it really such a bad thing?  In writing about the law, smart and dedicated scholars might change their views over a period of time.  Theory may be porous.  Perspectives change.  I’m not sure if that is incoherence.

(3) Are specialty academic conferences on the wane?  How can one prevent (or, should one desire to prevent) dilution of methodology-based or affinity-based programming?

For example, in my field of tax, “critical” perspectives are on the wane at the annual (so-called) Critical Tax Theory conference.  For me, that’s been a negative.  It’s harder to connect with other scholars engaging (or receptive to engaging) with tax material in a similar way.  For others (and perhaps significantly, for funding purposes?), though, the shift away from critical tax theory (at the Critical Tax Theory Conference — yes, extremely ironic) has made the meetings more appealing.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off

Heen on “From Coverture to Contract: Engendering Insurance”

Mary Heen (Richmond) has posted to SSRN her article From Coverture to Contract: Engendering Insurance, 23 Yale J. of Law & Feminism 335 (2011).  Here is the abstract:

In the 1840s, state legislatures began modifying the law of marital status to ease the economic distress of widows and children at the family breadwinner’s death. Insurance-related exceptions to the common law doctrine of “marital unity” under coverture permitted married women to enter into insurance contracts and protected life insurance proceeds from their husbands’ creditors.

These early insurance-related statutory exceptions to coverture introduced an important theoretical question that persisted for the rest of the nineteenth century — and into the next — as broader legal and social reforms took hold. How could equality of contract for married women be reconciled with the traditional dependencies of the home? Equality of contract also introduced the practical economic problem of how the lives of women could be valued apart from their husbands when the law otherwise enforced their economic dependency.

The theoretical and practical issues were resolved for life insurance and annuity contracts, the Article argues, by an increased emphasis on “natural” differences between men and women when those differences comported with traditional gender status hierarchies and dependencies. Gender-distinct mortality tables and higher rates for coverage of women first appeared in annuity contracts used to fund lifetime financial support independent of or as a substitute for marital rights. Gender-merged tables and unisex rates generally prevailed, however, in life insurance contracts used to protect wives and children from the family breadwinner’s death, a more traditional pattern of household dependency. Gender-distinct rates thus tempered, in both symbolic and practical/economic terms, the equality of contract recognized by the statutory exceptions to coverture. The selective adoption of gender-distinct insurance rates during the first wave of woman’s rights activism illustrates the role played by marketplace contracts in reinforcing the traditional status relationships and dependencies of the home.

The full paper is available here.

-Bridget Crawford

 


Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Feminist Legal History, Women and Economics | Comments Off

Amanda Marcotte on the False Digital vs. “Real Life” Activism Dichotomy

Over at On the Issues Magazine, Amanda Marcotte writes about Getting Over the the Online vs. Offline Debate.  Here is an excerpt:

[T[he distinction between online and offline life is collapsing to the point of meaninglessness, making some of the discussion about online and offline activism sound a little like having a debate on cars that assumes they are used mostly for recreation instead of a primary form of getting around to live your actual life. You can try, I suppose, to run offline activism as if the Internet didn't exist, but that's a little like sending telegrams because you find telephones disconcertingly modern. I'm sure some people do it, but I'm 34 years old now and I can't actually say I've ever really participated in any kind of pure offline activism in my life. Even when I do offline activism, it's still online.

Let’s take, for instance, a protest in New York City in February 2011 on behalf of Planned Parenthood, and where I spoke.  * * *  I was invited to speak at this rally because I had started a Twitter campaign supporting Planned Parenthood and I invited people to thank the organization while using the hashtag#thanksppfa. Thousands of stories were collected in one spot over just a couple of days. The organizers of the rally spread the word through online means, such as Facebook and blogs. Before the rally, a friend of mine used online methods to organize a sign-making party, and we made sure to take photos of our signs with our cameras and post them online. * * *

 In the past, protest organizers were quite often at the mercy of the mainstream media, who could render a protest basically useless by deciding not to cover it. With the Internet — and especially with smart phones — that becomes much less of an issue. * * *

Fears that the Internet would somehow discourage people from getting out in the world and having that critical face-to-face interaction that adds depth to our activism are often proving to have missed the point completely. People crave reasons to leave the house and meet others, and the Internet gives them more reason to do so. In the past, going to an activist event often was a matter of luck — did you see the right flier or come across the right person before the event? Now, you can create invite chains on Facebook that will reach people that were unreachable before, and integrate them more readily into the community.

Read the full piece here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Activism, Feminism and Technology | Comments Off

In Memory of Jane Larson 1958-2011

image source: http://www.law.wisc.edu/profiles/janelarson@wisc.edu

Professor Jane Larson died December 24, 2011, at her home in Madison, Wisconsin. She was a noted feminist legal historian on the faculty of the University of Wisconsin Law School. Colleagues around the country are expressing their shock and sorrow at this loss (see links below).  In her writing, Jane championed the rights of women and of the poor and disenfranchised, drawing on empirical, legal, and philosophical sources.

Her work in feminist legal history shed light on current gender issues as well as on past struggles.  As she wrote in her 1993 Columbia Law Review article, “Women Understand So Little, They Call my Good Nature Deceit”:  A Feminist Rethinking of Seduction:

Laws can be reformed and still have little power to remedy injury if lawyers, judges, and juries cannot appreciate the harm a victim says she has suffered, and remain stubbornly unwilling to dignify her experience with an effective and responsive legal remedy. …For at its root, a discussion of [gendered legal problems such as] seduction calls for an understanding of our cultural vision of men, women, and their relationship through sex to the society. If we can uncover the sources of our reluctance to dignify the voices of the sexually injured, we can begin to strip our culture’s seduction narrative of its fatalism and hypocrisy, and thereby return the sexual choices made by men and women to a world where change and reform are imaginable. (p. 472)

Jane Larson could understand the harm of others, because she possessed a unique capacity for empathy. As the Roman playwright Terence might have put it, nothing human was alien to her. And she possessed a unique incapacity for fatalism and hypocrisy. While the combination of capacity and incapacity often made her life harder for her than for us less gifted mortals, it fueled her remarkable achievements on behalf of those who society had, unnecessarily, and unjustifiably, harmed.

Other writings in feminist legal scholarship included her pathbreaking book with Linda Hirshman, Hard Bargains: The Politics of Sex (1999), numerous articles, and key contributions to the historians’ amicus briefs in William L. Webster v. Reproduction Health Service and  Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Washington v. Casey, a case which ultimately upheld the reasoning of Roe v. Wade. It was typical of Jane that, while Hirshman put the philosophical skeleton around Hard Bargains, Jane’s historical record of real peoples’ suffering and activism was what gave the book its heart.  Her friend and colleague Guadalupe Luna writes:

With a heavy heart and much sadness I report the passing of my querida amiga Jane “Juanita” Larson on December 24, 2011.  Jane was a widely recognized and much respected feminist scholar but she was also active in a number of Latina/o activities and projects.  She was a generous scholar and was extremely supportive of so many trying to enter as well as stay in the academy. (http://nuestrasvoceslatinas.com)

Jane’s compassionate vision was apparent in her scholarly and activist work on law in the colonias (rural settlements along the U.S.-Mexico border), where she documented, analyzed, and attempted to address the suffering of marginalized populations.  Her research combined fieldwork with legal analysis and practical interventions designed to give colonias residents title to their land.

Jane was 53 years old, and is survived by her son Simon and her sister Jennifer, both of whom were very dear to her heart. A devoted jazz aficionado, she asked for Coltrane instead of an epidural while in labor.  Those of us who knew her will always remember the depth of her thought and of her caring.

Blog links:

University of Wisconsin Law School announcement, here

Published obituary, Madison.com, here

Guadalupe Luna, at Nuestras Voces Latinas, here

Al Brophy, at The Faculty Lounge, here

Howard Wasserman, at Prawfsblawg, here

Diane Marie Amann, at IntLawGrrls, here 

Kevin Johnson, at Immigration Law Profs Blog (here)

Dan Rodriguez, at Northwestern Law School’s Dean’s Blog, here

Brian Leither, at Brian Leiter’s Law School Reports, here

In January, there will be an extended posting on Jane on the New Legal Realism blog, here.

-Linda Hirshman and Beth Mertz

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Deaths | Comments Off

Grief for the Children One Couldn’t or Didn’t Have

image source: virtualtourist.com

Writer Charlotte Bacon describes her pilgrimage to a Bhutanese temple:

[T]his was the place to release the grief that had come with the obstetric misery that dogged my late 30s. We had our son with ease when I was almost 35. But when we were ready for another baby three years later, my aging body proved less willing.

One loss followed another, and then another, the last releasing a baby at five months. The sadness in the wake of what felt like my failure was numbing. It is not the same as losing a child you’ve embraced and named, no. But it was hard and dark and drove me toward choices I thought I would never make.

Finally, when I was 41, through a stark amalgam of science, chilly doctors, my own steely drive and who knows what measure of luck, my daughter arrived, strong, sweet and fully loved. When she was born, I thought the spell of harshness was over. She had redeemed those losses. They were grieved and gone and I could lose myself instead in her. And I did.

But there in Chimi, wrapped in the balmy reek of incense, I realized that the sadness I thought I had dismissed was still at work in me. Grief has its own rate of decay, and it rarely coincides with when we think it ought to go. Each baby’s shadow was still there, wrapped like a length of silver wire around bone, as close and deep and glinting as that.

In Chimi I was able to grasp the end of each wire, unwind it and feel the fragments of life or soul that were still in me splinter, dissolve and depart. Where? I don’t know. Somewhere else. Beyond me.

As they left, I wished them well, I said goodbye. With each ending came a new sense of peace and clarity and fullness. The sadness had had such a quiet grasp on me.

Now, in its wake, there was room for a bloom of gratitude, not only for being the mother of my particular children, embodied, here and healthy, but for being allowed to be a vessel for life, to be the channel through which more life had come, on its own terms, for its own reasons.

Read the full essay here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Feminism and Technology, Reproductive Rights | 1 Comment

NYT Profile of Bronx Prostitute: A Survivor

It’s difficult to know what to make of the 52, and Still Working the Streets, a “Character Study” in the December 30, 2011 edition of the New York Times.  Reporter Corey Kilgannon profiles Ms. Barbara Terry, a 52 year-old prostitute in the Hunts Point area of the Bronx.

On the one hand, the profile appears to imply, “Hey, being a street prostitute isn’t so bad!”  The reporter notes that Ms. Terry has been a prostitute for 30 years, that she “hopes to retire in a year or so to a house she bought upstate” and that she put two children through college.  On the other hand, Mr. Kilgannon observes that Ms. Terry no longer has all of her teeth (“lost to diabetes, Ms.  Terry says”), and reminds readers of a series of sexual assaults and rapes of Bronx prostitutes last year (news coverage here).

Unfortunately, the profile doesn’t explain the “bad accident” that left Ms. Terry “hospitalized with a broken jaw and neck injuries.”  And there’s mention of Ms. Terry’s arrest record.  The reporter records Ms. Terry’s advice to younger prostitutes about “how to jump in a Dumpster to hide from the police, and how to stay alive. First, never enter a car with more than one person in it, and never let someone drive you out of the area. Get your money up front — Ms. Terry charges $50 or $100 — and try to work with a buddy.”

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Prostitution | Comments Off

Taking Exception: Is Evidence of Prior Oral Sex by 15 Year-Old Victim Admissible in Prosecution of 38 Year-Old?

A 38 year-old defendant is charged with four counts of sexual conduct with a minor, and it is undisputed that he engaged in four acts of oral sexual intercourse with the victim, who was 15 years-old. The defendant, however, seeks to present evidence that the victim had engaged in oral sex with two other individuals, claiming that it went to his belief that the victim was eighteen or older. Should the court deem this evidence admissible? According to a trial court the answer is “yes,” and it may reach the same conclusion after a remand from the Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Continue reading

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary | Comments Off

When Mary Saw Two Pink Lines

Via The (UK) Telegraph, this story of vandalism to a billboard outside an Anglican church in Auckland, New Zealand:

A scissor-wielding protester has destroyed a controversial billboard of the Virgin Mary, just days after it went up outside a New Zealand church.

Hours after the attack, 100 or so Roman Catholics gathered to pray in the rain in front of the ruined billboard, which had shown Mary gasping in shock as she examined a pregnancy testing kit.

The billboard outside the Anglican church of St Matthew’s in the City, in central Auckland, New Zealand, had drawn thousands of angry comments as well as messages of support from around the world.

Arthur Skinner, a member of an organisation calling itself the Catholic Action Group, who described the Renaissance-style picture as “satanic”, was photographed attacking it.

“Yes, it is vandalism,” Mr Skinner proclaimed proudly outside the church.

“I’m guilty. If they want to arrest me, be my guest.

Read the full story here.  Read reporter David Gibson’s take here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Religion | Comments Off

The Vermont Frat Questionnaire & The Foreseeability of Stranger Rape Based Upon Increased Acquaintance Rape at a College

If I could rape someone, who would it be?

This now infamous question, asked at the end of a fraternity questionnaire at the University of Vermont, led to the fraternity being suspended. But let’s say that the university took no action in response to this question. And let’s say that the university also took no or only minimal action in response to a rise in the number of (acquaintance) rapes on its campus over a period of two years. Finally, let’s say that a victim was raped at college by a stranger, who turned out to be one of the members of this fraternity, and sued the school for negligence. If the university moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, claiming that the rape was not foreseeable, should the court grant the motion? According to the opinion of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in Lees v. Carthage College, 2011 WL 3844115 (E.D.Wis. 2011), the apparent answer is, “yes, the court should grant summary judgment” even in the face of expert testimony to the contrary. In fact, according to the court, such expert testimony should be deemed inadmissible.

Continue reading

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary | Comments Off

AALS Section on Employment Discrimination and Section on Labor Relations and Employment Law 2011 Newsletter

The AALS Section on Employment Discrimination and Section on Labor Relations and Employment Law have produced a joint Newsletter for 2011.

The Newsletter contains info about relevant AALS presentations, including hot topics panels. It continues with a list of hires, promotions, moves & awards, followed by a list of announcements, and a list of publications from section members. The newsletter concludes with a Supreme Court round-up.

You can view a copy here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia, Employment Discrimination | Comments Off

Remembering Paula E. Hyman, 1946-2011

Over at the Jewish Daily Forward, Deborah Dash Moore writes a moving remembrance of historian Paula Hyman, who died today.  Professor Hyman was the Lucy G. Moses Professor of Modern Jewish History at Yale University and the author of The Jewish Woman In America (1976); From Dreyfus to Vichy: The Remaking of French Jewry, 1906-1939 (1979); The Emancipation of the Jews of Alsace (1991); Gender and Assimilation in Modern Jewish History (1995); and The Jews of Modern France (1998).

Born in Boston on September 30, 1946, the oldest of Sydney and Ida Tatelman Hyman’s three daughters, Paula attended public schools and supplementary Hebrew schools. She enrolled simultaneously at Radcliffe College and Hebrew Teachers College of Boston, earning undergraduate degrees at both institutions. She went on to Columbia University, where she studied alongside such scholars as Gerson Cohen and Ismar Schorsch, and where she received her master’s degree and Ph.D. in Jewish history.

Her years in New York City, during the 1970s and 1980s, proved formative. She joined the New York Havurah, an experimental Jewish religious community, and helped found Ezrat Nashim, a Jewish consciousness-raising group that advocated for women’s equality in American Jewish life. Hyman quickly emerged as a leader of a burgeoning Jewish feminism, pressing the Conservative movement to count women in a minyan and ordain women as rabbis.

Her activism did not derail her pursuits of a sustained scholarly career and of a rich family life. In 1969, she married Stanley H. Rosenbaum, then a medical student, and the couple had two daughters, Judith and Adina.

In 1974, Hyman accepted a position on the history faculty at Columbia. She went on to adapt her doctoral dissertation into a book, “From Dreyfus to Vichy: The Remaking of French Jewry, 1906-1939.” Published in 1979, its breadth and innovative social history method quickly established her as a rising star in Jewish history. She then embarked on a micro-history of small Jewish communities in Alsace, publishing “The Emancipation of the Jews of Alsace: Acculturation and Tradition in the Nineteenth Century” in 1991.

She also deployed her considerable historical acumen to bring immigrant Jewish women’s history into the consciousness of American Jews. An article on the New York kosher meat boycott of 1902 became her most anthologized work.

Hyman pursued such trailblazing activities and broke numerous glass ceilings, even as she faced multiple bouts of cancer. She battled illness courageously, refusing to slacken her pace. But living with an acute consciousness of her mortality toughened her, making her impatient with tokenism involving women even as she treasured the blessings of family and friends.

Hyman nourished several generations of students at Columbia, the Jewish Theological Seminary of America and Yale University. In 1981, she became first woman to serve as dean of the Seminary College of Jewish Studies, and in 1986, she joined the faculty of Yale University. At Yale she was, until her death, the Lucy G. Moses Professor of Modern Jewish History. Three years after coming to Yale, she was appointed director of the Jewish Studies department, becoming the first woman to lead a major university Jewish studies program; she held that position for more than a decade.

Read the full piece here.

May Professor Hyman’s memory be a blessing.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Deaths, Feminism and Religion, Firsts | Comments Off

“The Internet Swear Jar,” A Guest Post By Samantha Berg

A few days ago I wrote a comment at the Reclusive Leftist blog about misogynistic verbal abuse being unacceptable whether the target is a blogger or a prostitute and whether they are paid or not. Since then I’ve been fleshing out what it means to be paid for sexual abuse in the context of the internet.

Men call prostituted women a creative litany of slurs that women bloggers are only now learning. Radical feminists have long known the hate speech of pornography is itself sexual abuse that perpetuates further abuse against prostituted women and all women, and for our accurate assessment we have had that hate hurled at us faster and more aggressively.

Many women bloggers have shared complaints through the #mencallmethings Twitter hashtag, but few solutions have been offered by liberal feminists more worried about being perceived as pro-censorship than in stopping men’s verbal harassments.

In the name of harm reduction, I propose the Internet Swear Jar.

Sex workers are paid to be called misogynistic names and people consider it a fair transaction. Most high-profile feminist bloggers – ones who ask for donations to support their feminism – agree with that status quo situation. By the usual rationales for accepting prostitution and pornography, why shouldn’t men be allowed to pay any woman willing to take money in exchange for having some control over the verbal abuse she must endure?
Bloggers could post a menu of prices, and of course they would have the final choice on whether or not to accept twenty dollars to be publicly called a cocksucking cunt, but if your political ethic encompasses Yes Means Yes and Sex Work Is Work beliefs then men should be able to ask you ‘yes or no’ sex work questions. People who reject prostitution as employment wouldn’t participate, but there’s no reason for pro-sexwork bloggers to reject hearing out sincere “sass for cash” offers they would expect other women to accept.
The sex work declared so rife with diversity that “not a monolith!” has become its mantra can’t be considered 100% monolithically terrible when the question becomes one of pro-sex work women considering freelance job offers.

Men are going to threaten and call women bloggers horrifically violent names anyway. Like the common belief in prostitution’s inevitability, it can’t be stopped. However, the extra harm reduction money can make blogging a little easier for women who have to deal with verbal sexism.

Grievances taken through the legal system commonly result in financial compensation. A system of direct payment would be a less time-consuming and economical way of achieving an already established form of justice.

Maybe disabled men with no other emotional outlet than anonymously spitting invective at women bloggers need that catharthic emoting to be healthy, and the conscientious women who consent to provide that service should be financially compensated.

By now I hope you’ve figured out I’m speaking hypothetically. There is no logical and humane answer to the question, “When is it all right to call a woman a flea-bitten whore who deserves to be raped?” that kicks off the start of payment negotiations.

But pro-sex work bloggers are not being philosophically cheeky about women arranging their own sexualized abuse in exchange for money. They really support the status quo of prostitution that permits payment for sexist humiliation. A key difference is that bloggers aren’t physically assaulted after getting called dehumanizing names, whereas no one in the world is more raped than prostituted women.

With credit to Stephen Roberts for amending his famous quote about atheism, “I contend that we are both abolitionists. I just believe in fewer sex workers than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all sex work jobs for yourself, you will understand why I dismiss all sex work jobs for women.”

Samantha Berg

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Activism, Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Human Trafficking, If you're a woman, Pornography's Harms, Sex Trafficking | 1 Comment

Judicial Deference to the Military: Sexual Assault is Not Cognizable

Just as the judicial deference to the military’s DADT policy on sexual orientation eventually eroded, so too will the judicial deference to the military’s policies on sexual assault eventually crumble.   Well, at least that’s possible.  Isn’t it?

Although a 2 page dismissal of the highly publicized complaint by 28 plaintiffs, including member of the Coast Guard Kori Cioca, doesn’t provide much cause for optimism.  More here.

~Ruthann Robson

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Coerced Sex, If you're a woman, Justice? | 1 Comment

U Cincinnati Posting for Dean of College of Arts & Sciences

The University of Cincinnati has posted this notice of its search for a Dean of its College of Arts & Sciences.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia | Comments Off

On “Violence Against Women is a Global Pandemic”

Soraya Chemaly writes at the Huffington Post that Violence Against Women is a Global Pandemic.  Here is an excerpt from the stats she cites in the article:

  • Every nine seconds in the US a woman is assaulted or beaten.
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, women experience about 4.8 million intimate partner-related physical assaults and rapes every year.
  • Around the world, at least one in every three women has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused during her lifetime.
  • As many as one in four women experience physical and/or sexual violence during pregnancy, for example, which increases the likelihood of having a miscarriage, stillbirth and abortion.
  • Up to 53 percent of women in the world are physically abused by their intimate partners – defined as either being kicked or punched in the abdomen.
  • In Sao Paulo, Brazil, which is so much fun to visit, a woman is assaulted every 15 seconds.
  • In Ecuador, adolescent girls reporting sexual violence in school identified teachers as the perpetrator in 37 per cent of cases.

Read Soraya Chemaly’s full piece here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence | Comments Off

Canadian Journal of Women and the Law: Archives and Current Issue

From our more northern-dwelling colleagues, this announcement:

Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit Volume 23, Number 2, 2011 is now available online.

Founded in 1985, the same year as the equality guarantee of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms came into force, the Canadian Journal of Women and the Law has been publishing ground-breaking, multi-disciplinary scholarship on the impact of law on women’s social, economic and legal status for twenty-five years.

CJWL Online includes an archive of current and previously published articles going back to 2009.

Subscribers to CJWL Online enjoy:

Enhanced features not available in the print version - supplementary information, colour photos, videos, audio files, etc. encouraging further exploration and research.

Early access to the latest issues - Did you know that most online issues are available to subscribers up to two weeks in advance of the print version? Sign up for e-mail alerts and you will know as soon as the latest issue is ready for you to read.

Everything you need at your fingertips - search through current and archived issues from the comfort of your office chair not by digging through book shelves or storage boxes. The easy to use search function allows you to organize results by article summaries, abstracts or citations and bookmark, export, or print a specific page, chapter or article.

For more information about the Canadian Journal of Women and the Law or for submissions information, please contact:

Canadian Journal of Women and the Law
University of Toronto Press­­ – Journals Division
5201 Dufferin Street, Toronto, ON Canada M3H 5T8
Tel: (416)667-7810  Fax: (416)667-7881
Email: journals@utpress.utoronto.ca

Website: www.utpjournals.com

-Bridget Crawford

 

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off

Judge Orders Woman To Pay Alimony, Legal Fees, To Ex-Spouse Convicting Of Attacking Her

A San Diego judge has told an ex-wife  to pay her ex-husband’s legal fees and be ready to pay him alimony should he make the request once he leaves prison. Judge Geoffrey Pollack noted that he had discretion in the matter of what spousal support to award Shawn Pollack, sentenced to 6 years by another judge after his conviction for forced oral copulation on Crystal Harris. Thus Judge Pollack decided to lower the award from $3000 to $1000 per month once Mr. Pollack is released. The judge agreed that Ms. Harris does not have to pay support while Mr. Harris is incarcerated, and approved an agreement between the two parties that Ms. Harris pay Mr. Harris’ legal fees. However, Mr. Harris must pay his ex-wife restitution.

The judge justified the spousal award by saying that he compared the financial situations of the parties. Ms. Harris makes over $11,000 per month and her ex-husband was making about $400 per month. “”I can’t look at a 12-year marriage where one side is making $400 a month, the other side is making over $11,000 and say no spousal support….That would be an abuse of discretion.”  California legal experts note that under the law the judge could have refused to award support only if one party had been convicted of attempted murder.

Ms. Harris is understandably upset. She told the press, ““You don’t pay a dime to somebody that rapes you…That’s sick.” She also said she feared challenging the award because the judge might award her ex-husband more money.

The district attorney’s office, however, has taken up Ms. Harris’ cause and has lined up a state representative to introduce a bill to make changes in the law by increasing the range of crimes that would disqualify an ex-spouse from receiving alimony.

The story has already made headlines around the U.S. and across the pond.

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Families, Feminism and Law, If you're a woman, Justice? | Comments Off

The Only Exception: Arkansas Case Reveals Danger Of State’s Undifferentiated Rape Shield Exception

Like many state counterparts, Federal Rule of Evidence 412(a), the Federal Rape Shield Rule, precludes the admission of evidence of an alleged victim’s prior sexual behavior/predisposition to prove her propensity to consent to sexual acts and her likely conformity with that propensity, and thus consent, at the time of the crime charged. And, like many state counterparts, Federal Rule of Evidence 412(b) contains three enumerated and narrowly construed exceptions to this proscription. See, e.g., United States v. Shamsud-Din, 2011 WL 5118840 (N.D.Ill. 2011) (“The Seventh Circuit has noted that the exceptions to Rule 412 apply in ‘limited circumstances.’”).

As the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Arkansas in State v. Kindall, 2011 WL 5112841 (Ark. 2011), reveals, however, Arkansas’ rape shield rule contains an undifferentiated, catch-all exception. And, as the opinion also reveals, that’s a dangerous thing.

Continue reading

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary | Comments Off

Egg Donor Motivation: Sacrificing Truth for Profit?

Over at Jezebel, Jenna Marotta asks (here), “Do Egg Donors Lie?” Ms. Marotta was rejected as an egg donor about her experience because she admitted to having a family history of depression.  She wonders whether other women lie about mental health issues in order to become compensated egg donors.

I can’t help thinking that in a country with so many anti-depressants prescribed, where so many people live long enough to develop cancer (and survive), some women will lie to donate their eggs for guaranteed compensation. As the founders and directors of egg donation agencies I spoke with confirmed, there is no such thing as a donor with a perfect family history.  * * *

While there are a lot of inquiries from women looking into donate, the number of women accepted remains very low. At Alternative Reproductive Resources, [president and founder Robin] von Halle says that although she receives up to 40 or 50 inquiries a day, perhaps five percent of those women go on to donate (“You have to be accepted and you also have to follow through” with the estimated three month process, she says.) Part of the reason the rejection rate is so high is that women may not know what factors will make them ineligible to donate their eggs — clinics don’t necessarily make the information public. “If the secret is out, then no one will tell the truth on their applications,” says [Mary] Fusillo [, founder and director of a Houston surrogacy agency]. [Souad] Dreyfus [director of a Florida surrogacy agency] has another take: “If you put this list out there, a lot of people will disqualify themselves,” as I would have done. But this lack of transparency may cause women to get their hopes up in vain. This is especially troubling given that many women consider egg donation after a life setback –- job loss, unexpected expenses, or a family tragedy might leave them emotionally and fiscally vulnerable. “A lot of young women, when they make that decision, there’s no room for rejection,” Dreyfus says. * * *

“It would be a complete lie to say donors are not motivated by financial motivation,” says [Rachel] Campbell [, a social worker at a Boston surrogacy agency]. “But for the donor who gets through the process” -– medical screening, psychological screening, genetic testing, being matched with a couple, interfacing with the egg donation agency and the couple’s fertility clinic, legal counseling, hormone injections, egg retrieval –- “their motivation is something bigger, they’re doing something more meaningful than just trying to make a quick buck.” Of the five donors I interviewed for this story, four of them said money was the catalyst but that they did not turn to egg donation as a “last resort” (the fifth donor waived her fee –- she donated her eggs to secure her brother-in-law and his wife a place at the front of the line to get matched with their own donor).

The description that surrogates themselves offer — that “money was the catalyst” for egg provision strikes me as especially important. The fertility industry relies the myth that egg donors are purely altruistic actors.  Marotta’s sources suggest otherwise (and in that sense, Marotta’s piece is consistent with the critiques offered by Kim Krawiec, for example, here and here).

Marotta also reports, without much explanation, that “many women consider egg donation after a life setback –- job loss, unexpected expenses, or a family tragedy might leave them emotionally and fiscally vulnerable.”  I would be curious to read more about the relationship between these “life setbacks” and the timing of egg transfers.  The data might or might not suggest psychological or financial motives that are otherwise obscured.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Technology, Reproductive Rights, Women and Economics | Comments Off

Cyber-Activism: Petition to Apple CEO Tim Cook Requesting Siri Directions to Family Planning Services

There’s an internet-based petition addressed to Tim Cook, CEO of Apple, Apple, Apple PR and iPhone 4s, which says:

Apple: Stop promoting anti-choice extremists. If a user asks for family planning services, they should be directed to a group that offers full services, like Planned Parenthood–not to a hard-right clinic with an extremist agenda.

If you’d like to sign on, see here.

H/T Adele Bernhard.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Activism, Feminism and Technology | Comments Off

Apple and Siri’s Anti-Choice Politics

Over at The Raw Story (here), Megan Carpentier reports on “10 things the iPhone Siri will help you get instead of an abortion”:

Ask the Siri, the new iPhone 4 assistant, where to get an abortion, and, if you happen to be in Washington, D.C., she won’t direct you to the Planned Parenthood on 16th St, NW. Instead, she’ll suggest you pay a visit to the 1st Choice Women’s Health Center, an anti-abortion Crisis Pregnancy Center (CPC) in Landsdowne, Virginia, or Human Life Services, a CPC in York, Pennsylvania. Ask Google the same question, and you’ll get ads for no less than 7 metro-area abortion clinics, 2 CPCs and a nationwide abortion referral service.

Ask in New York City, and Siri will tell you “I didn’t find any abortion clinics.” * * *

But Siri certainly seems to know a whole lot about plenty of other things iPhone customers might want. Below are 10 things Siri can help you find.

1. Viagra.
2. Hospitals to go to if you’ve had an erection lasting for more than 5 hours.
3. Places you might be able to score marijuana.
4. Where to dump a body: in Brooklyn, it recommends a smelting plant in New Jersey.
5. The meaning of life: Siri will alternately quote from Douglas Adams (42) or Monty Python’s “The Meaning Of Life.”
6. What to do if a hamster is caught in your rectum: in D.C., she’ll direct you to Charming Cherries Escort Service.
7. Asked how to obtain a free blow job in D.C., she’ll direct you to the same escort service. (We doubt that they are free.)
8. If you’d like to see a naked woman in Brooklyn, Siri will suggest a variety of Manhattan-based strip clubs.

See more coverage of Siri’s anti-choice politics here at Feministing and here at Gizmodo.

H/T Darren Rosenblum.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Technology | Comments Off

New Documentary: “The Purity Myth: The Virginity Movement’s War Against Women”

The Media Education Foundation has released a new documentary film, “The Purity Myth: The Virginity Movement’s War Against Women.”  Here is a clip:


The movie is based on Jessica Valenti’s book The Purity Myth. She shares writing credit on the film with Jeremy Earp.  More info available here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Sexism in the Media | Comments Off

American Journalist Sexually Assaulted by Egyptian Gov’t Forces

Author and activist Mona Eltahawy is back in New York after being arrested, detained and sexually assaulted by members of the Egyptian Interior Ministry last week.

Read her Twitter account of the incident here.  Her left arm and right hand were broken.

I had the pleasure of meeting Mona earlier this year through friends of friends, and she is a courageous and truth-telling citizen of the world (as well as a U.S. citizen….!).

Read more here, here and here.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Sisters In Other Nations | 1 Comment

CFP: Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, Jan. 30, 2012 Deadline

From students at Iowa:

The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice

Call for Submissions

Innovative Scholarship needed for Volume 16

The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice is dedicated to the living discussion of feminist inquiry and critical race analysis in legal scholarship. We explore how people are classified, stratified, ignored and singled out under the law because of race, sex, gender, economic class, ability, sexual identity and the multitude of labels applied to us. The Journal would like to invite legal authors of all perspectives to submit proposals for articles to fill Volume 16 of our publication.

For more information about the Journal and our submission policy, please see here.

Please send article or proposal submissions, along with your curriculum vitae to Whitney Smith at whitney-e-smith@uiowa.edu.

Submission Deadline is January 30, 2012.

I published with the Journal of Gender, Race & Justice a few years back, and had a good experience FWIW.

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation | Comments Off

Save the Date: CUNY Symposium on “Looking Forward: Rhonda Copelon’s Legacy in Action and the Future of International Women’s Human Rights Law”

From colleagues at CUNY:

The City University of New York Law Review invites you to *save the date*for its annual symposium, Looking Forward: Rhonda Copelon’s Legacy in Action and the Future of International Women’s Human Rights Law.

On March 30, 2012, CUNY Law Review’s annual symposium will highlight the groundbreaking work of Rhonda Copelon, the human rights lawyer, activist, professor, and co-founder of the International Women’s Human Rights Clinic at CUNY School of Law, who broke new ground opening U.S. federal courts and international tribunals to claims seeking redress against gender-based violence and human rights violations.

Learn how Rhonda Copelon’s legacy has sparked human rights lawyers’ cutting-edge application of international women’s human rights law in topics including:

-       Sexual Rights Development under International Law
-       Reproductive Rights at Home and Abroad
-       Rape as a Form of Torture
-       Domestic Implementation of International Human Rights Law.

Some of the panelists include:
-       Sir Nigel Rodley, *UN Human Rights Committee Member & Former Special Rapporteur on Torture*
-       Andrea Ritchie, *Urban Justice Center, and co-author of Queer (In)Justice*
-       *Pam Spees, Center for Constitutional Rights*
-       Jessica Stern, *International Gay & Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC)***

-       Felice Gaer, *UN Committee Against Torture*
-       Patricia Viseur-Sellers, *Former Legal Adviser for Gender-Related Crimes at the ICTY and ICTR*
-        Rosa Celorio, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
-        Monica Roa, *Women’s Link Worldwide*
-       Nancy Northup, *Center for Reproductive Rights*
-       Cathy Albisa, *National Economic and Social Rights Initiative (NESRI)*
-       Cindy Soohoo, *International Women’s Human Rights (IWHR) Clinic at CUNY School of Law*
-        Carrie Bettinger-Lopez, *Human Rights Clinic, University of Miami School of Law***
-        Joey Mogul, *People’s Law Office***
-       Blaine Bookey, *Center for Gender and Refugee Studies***

CLE credits are available and lunch will be provided.  We look forward to seeing you there!

-Bridget Crawford

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off

Would A Women In Penn State’s Athletic Administration Have Made a Difference?

Would the presence of a woman in the leadership of Penn State’s athletic program administration have made a difference in the still-unfolding sexual abuse scandal that has rocked the campus? Dionne Koller, associate professor in the University of Baltimore School of Law and director of the Center for Sport and the Law, asks this question in an op-ed in the Nov. 21 edition of The Chronicle of Higher Education.

“At heart, the Penn State story shows why representation of women in athletic programs is not just about statistics or abstract notions of ‘equality,’ Koller argues in the piece. “A different voice, shaped by different gender experiences, might have seen the situation not from the position of a ‘brotherhood’ attempting to preserve the power and image and revenue that were propping up Penn State’s football franchise, but instead by recognizing the gravity of the victimization that was taking place.”

Read the article at http://chronicle.com/article/Its-a-Guy-Thing-at-Penn/129860/.

Post to Twitter

Share
Posted in Academia | Comments Off