<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherri Williams v. Attorney General of Alabama: 11th Circuit Upholds Alabama&#8217;s Vibrator Ban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2007/02/sherri-williams-v-attorney-general-of-alabama-11th-circuit-upholds-alabamas-vibrator-ban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2007/02/sherri-williams-v-attorney-general-of-alabama-11th-circuit-upholds-alabamas-vibrator-ban/</link>
	<description>Nearly all of us root for fairness, not for our own sex. - Nicholas Kristof</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist Law Professors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When is a Vibrator not a Vibrator?</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2007/02/sherri-williams-v-attorney-general-of-alabama-11th-circuit-upholds-alabamas-vibrator-ban/comment-page-1/#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminist Law Professors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; When is a Vibrator not a Vibrator?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=1513#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>[...] Alabama&#039;s anti-vibrator law, Ala.Code 1975 Â§ 13A-12-200.2 (a)(1), previously blogged here, provides that,&quot;It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly distribute, possess with intent to distribute, or offer or agree to distribute any obscene material or any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs for any thing of pecuniary value.&quot;Â  So can Alabamans buy Hitachi&#039;s Magic Wand?Â  If not, they are missing out!Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alabama&#8217;s anti-vibrator law, Ala.Code 1975 Â§ 13A-12-200.2 (a)(1), previously blogged here, provides that,&#8221;It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly distribute, possess with intent to distribute, or offer or agree to distribute any obscene material or any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs for any thing of pecuniary value.&#8221;Â  So can Alabamans buy Hitachi&#8217;s Magic Wand?Â  If not, they are missing out!Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

