Echidne on Nitpicking

Here is an excerpt from Echidne’s terrific new post:

… That there might be something deeper in the trivial topics some feminists (read: Echidne) chooses is lost on the critics. This something deeper is twofold: First, language matters. It matters that the most common insults in the unmoderated parts of the blog threads are about the object of the insult taking the female position in sex (blow me! bend over!). It matters that a politician who is viewed as bought is called someone’s bitch. It matters that “whores” are a common term of denigration, too. It even matters when a politician gives a speech with references to great statesmen, not to stateswomen, and it matters because of what the images might be that our brains create from that speech, and how those images then become expectations having to do with how a politician should look (masculine).

She also links to her classic rant about armpit hair, which you should read if you haven’t.

This entry was posted in Feminism and Politics, Feminist Blogs Of Interest. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Echidne on Nitpicking

  1. Pingback: The Debate Link