Breast is Best, But . . .

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

The New York Times reported last week that about 77 percent of new mothers breast-feed, the highest percentage in the United States in over a decade.   However, at six months age for the newborn, the rate of breast-feeding is the same as it has been, which is much lower than government-targeted rates.   This means that too many women try breast-feeding but don’t continue doing so.

The increased rate of breast-feeding at birth is encouraging because of all the health benefits associated with breast-feeding:   “The increase in initial breast-feeding has been driven at least in part by a concerted campaign by medical groups and government agencies that have sought to educate mothers about the benefits of breast-feeding and, increasingly, the risks associated with infant formula. . . . Studies have shown that children who are fed formula have increased risks of ear and respiratory infections, obesity, diabetes and even cancer.”

Campaigns to increase the rate of breast-feeding are wonderful.   But, at the same time, they are flawed without more, and maybe that’s why the rate at six-months isn’t increasing.

First, as has been pointed out by many, campaigns need to come with a push to make breast-feeding easier in a women’s lives.   Some working women get the support they need from their employer, but that’s the exception.   Most struggle to fit breast-feeding and pumping into their work lives and get no support from their employer in doing so.   All breast-feeding women struggle with finding breast-feeding-friendly public space.   The law needs to work to make breast-feeding easier for women.   But, despite this being incredibly important, it is well-worn territory.

In my mind, what is less-well-worn is a second flaw with current campaigns to increase the rate of breast-feeding.   This second flaw is that information about just how difficult many women find breast-feeding is not a major part of the campaign.   Admittedly, I’m speaking from my personal experiences (which are even more limited because I’m a man), but almost every woman I know who has breast-fed has had major problems — engorgement, oversupply, undersupply, mastitis, blebs, clogged ducts, cracked nipples, biting babies, etc.   And, most of them were surprised by this.   Breast-feeding had been portrayed to them as this wonderful experience between mother and child.   And, ultimately, it was.   But, the picture drawn did not include information about just how difficult it would be — physically and emotionally — and about how committed many women have to be to persevere through the difficult times.   With more accurate information about difficulties that many, if not most, women go through, maybe campaigns to increase breast-feeding would actually be more effective in the long-run, as more women might continue through difficulties if they knew that their problems were common, if not almost universal.

Certainly La Leche League, lactation consultants, OB/GYNs, midwives, and other personal/familial connections can provide this information, but it needs to be out there even more, a significant part of every campaign to increase breast-feeding.   Breast-feeding is natural, but it’s also incredibly hard for many women.   That shouldn’t be ignored.   The more realistic campaigns on the issue are, the more successful they’ll be.

– David S. Cohen

Share
This entry was posted in Women's Health. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Breast is Best, But . . .

  1. hysperia says:

    AND if women weren’t feeling inadequate about previously unheard of breast-feeding problems, they might seek help from each other! Like I didn’t.

    THANKS for getting the news out!

  2. kdy says:

    The common nature of my breast feeding problems did not and would not make me “persevere” through the difficulties of breastfeeding. I HATED it. I had my kids starting in my mid thirties, I have a law degree, I read more childrearing related books than I care to admit, and I have several family members who are professional lactation consultants, nurses with masters degrees. I knew the ups and downs and ins and outs. And I HATED it. This article posits that if we just knew how tough it was going to be going in we would stick with it. No. The best healthcare professionals I encountered were the few who were brave enough in the face of the highly coercive breastfeeding OB culture to say, “if you hate it, don’t do it, formula is perfectly good nutrition for your baby, you should be happy during this time and not cringe every time you pick up your hungry baby.” Amen. Women who like breastfeeding should do it. I admire those women. Those who hate it should be able to quit without being made to feel like we are cheating our infants. And we should be able to avoid having to listen to people go on about how “breast is best” because that is truly a matter of opinion if you take the mother into consideration.

  3. Ann Bartow says:

    My experience was that the first three weeks was really hard, but then it got a lot easier and more manageable. I got through the first three weeks the way I get through most rough spots in life – with the support of a lot of terrific women. I had been warned what to expect by friends, which was an important part of the picture too. And I’d read up a bit too. And I joined a “new mothers” group and we all compared notes and commiserated.

    I’ve tried to be supportive of women who came after me. I’ll never forget talking to a weeping cousin on the phone and promsing her that it would get better, and her reply: “Ann, it has nowhere to go but up!”

  4. Pingback: Full Frontal Factory Farming : Elaine Vigneault