<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scalia&#8217;s Views of Privacy Apparently Change When His Personal Information is at Stake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/04/scalias-views-of-privacy-change-when-his-personal-information-is-at-stake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/04/scalias-views-of-privacy-change-when-his-personal-information-is-at-stake/</link>
	<description>Nearly all of us root for fairness, not for our own sex. - Nicholas Kristof</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: jenniferbard</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/04/scalias-views-of-privacy-change-when-his-personal-information-is-at-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-4863</link>
		<dc:creator>jenniferbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=10403#comment-4863</guid>
		<description>Since this story is still around, I wanted to pass on a comment I made over at the Faculty Lounge Blog.   I cannot believe that anyone with an internet connection would imagine that Prof Reidenberg did anything either inappropriate or unusual.

&quot;It&#039;s hard to imagine what could be unethical or even questionable about having students do what is essentially a Google search. Any person with an internet connection anywhere in the world could do the same thing. The problem isn&#039;t that they did it, it&#039;s that they could do it so easily.
There&#039;s a case in the Torts casebook I used with a successful cause of action against a detective agency for finding a woman&#039;s address and giving it to an old boy friend (the result as I recall was tragic). To show how times had changed regarding expectations of privacy I asked everyone to take a minute (they were all on-line)and find my last two addresses. They could all do it in less than a minute. And they found my brother too. 
It made my point that there is very little, if any, personal privacy left just as I think Prof. Reidenberg&#039;s exercise made his.
Oh--and the James Spader character did exactly the same thing as the Justice Scalia exercise about two weeks ago on Boston Legal but in open court to a similarly skeptical judge and jury.
That was poor judgment--although of course he won.&quot;
Posted by: Jennifer Bard &#124; April 30, 2009 at 01:45 AM 
Verify your Comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this story is still around, I wanted to pass on a comment I made over at the Faculty Lounge Blog.   I cannot believe that anyone with an internet connection would imagine that Prof Reidenberg did anything either inappropriate or unusual.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s hard to imagine what could be unethical or even questionable about having students do what is essentially a Google search. Any person with an internet connection anywhere in the world could do the same thing. The problem isn&#8217;t that they did it, it&#8217;s that they could do it so easily.<br />
There&#8217;s a case in the Torts casebook I used with a successful cause of action against a detective agency for finding a woman&#8217;s address and giving it to an old boy friend (the result as I recall was tragic). To show how times had changed regarding expectations of privacy I asked everyone to take a minute (they were all on-line)and find my last two addresses. They could all do it in less than a minute. And they found my brother too.<br />
It made my point that there is very little, if any, personal privacy left just as I think Prof. Reidenberg&#8217;s exercise made his.<br />
Oh&#8211;and the James Spader character did exactly the same thing as the Justice Scalia exercise about two weeks ago on Boston Legal but in open court to a similarly skeptical judge and jury.<br />
That was poor judgment&#8211;although of course he won.&#8221;<br />
Posted by: Jennifer Bard | April 30, 2009 at 01:45 AM<br />
Verify your Comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage Minds Around the Web &#124; Savage Minds</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/04/scalias-views-of-privacy-change-when-his-personal-information-is-at-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-4845</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage Minds Around the Web &#124; Savage Minds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=10403#comment-4845</guid>
		<description>[...] assignment legal but irresponsible. You can read a partial response by Reidenberg at Feminist Law Professors blog. Too bad Reidenberg isn&#8217;t on Slate&#8217;s reader poll on who should join Scalia on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] assignment legal but irresponsible. You can read a partial response by Reidenberg at Feminist Law Professors blog. Too bad Reidenberg isn&#8217;t on Slate&#8217;s reader poll on who should join Scalia on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob coley jr</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/04/scalias-views-of-privacy-change-when-his-personal-information-is-at-stake/comment-page-1/#comment-4833</link>
		<dc:creator>bob coley jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 06:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=10403#comment-4833</guid>
		<description>This kind of exercise and discussion brings forth many interesting and disturbing areas to think about. The availability of personal data, online anonymity, potential uses  or abuses, etc. This exercise shows how far the law lags behind technology and the unintended, as well as intended, consequences that have or may arise because of our not being completely honest with each other when it comes to our intentions. I hope our scientists hurry up and give us AI. Justice R2D2 WE NEED YOU!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of exercise and discussion brings forth many interesting and disturbing areas to think about. The availability of personal data, online anonymity, potential uses  or abuses, etc. This exercise shows how far the law lags behind technology and the unintended, as well as intended, consequences that have or may arise because of our not being completely honest with each other when it comes to our intentions. I hope our scientists hurry up and give us AI. Justice R2D2 WE NEED YOU!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

