<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Sex In Fiction Award nominees all male.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/12/bad-sex-in-fiction-award-nominees-all-male/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/12/bad-sex-in-fiction-award-nominees-all-male/</link>
	<description>Nearly all of us root for fairness, not for our own sex. - Nicholas Kristof</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sex Writing FAIL: Chatty Condoms, Dripping Oysters, and One Bullet-proof Pussy &#171; Kittywampus</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/12/bad-sex-in-fiction-award-nominees-all-male/comment-page-1/#comment-6376</link>
		<dc:creator>Sex Writing FAIL: Chatty Condoms, Dripping Oysters, and One Bullet-proof Pussy &#171; Kittywampus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=13928#comment-6376</guid>
		<description>[...] 18, 2009 by Sungold    Bobby sucks all the freckles and moles off her chestA couple of weeks back, Ann Bartow of Feminist Law Professors ran a post on the Literary Review&#8217;s Bad Sex in Writing awards, in which she observed that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 18, 2009 by Sungold    Bobby sucks all the freckles and moles off her chestA couple of weeks back, Ann Bartow of Feminist Law Professors ran a post on the Literary Review&#8217;s Bad Sex in Writing awards, in which she observed that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GudrunBrangwen</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/12/bad-sex-in-fiction-award-nominees-all-male/comment-page-1/#comment-6255</link>
		<dc:creator>GudrunBrangwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=13928#comment-6255</guid>
		<description>Difficult to believe Cave was nominated in my opinion.  Yes, the excerpts are just as ridiculous as everyone is saying; but they&#039;re meant to be.  It&#039;s a dark comedy.  The main character is a sex addict, who has multiple disturbing and distasteful sexual encounters over the course of the book.  The scenes are partly from Bunny Munro&#039;s point of view, and none of them are supposed to read as sexy or arousing.  Descriptions such as &quot;nipples like liquorice jelly spogs&quot; are meant to show his extreme obsession with female body parts.  

As the book progresses, the reader realizes more and more that Bunny is not just a philanderer, but a sexist and sexual predator who&#039;s deeply sick.  &quot;It&#039;s hard to miss the misogyny in those authors&#039; works&quot;?  I read it as a powerful *critique* of misogyny, since it reveals the bizarre mindset that would lead a man to victimize women (while thinking all the while that he&#039;s a charming playboy, as Bunny does throughout the book).

I haven&#039;t read these other books so I can&#039;t speak about them.  But using tacky, over-the-top language doesn&#039;t always equal &quot;bad writing,&quot; since authors often use irony or speak in their characters&#039; voices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Difficult to believe Cave was nominated in my opinion.  Yes, the excerpts are just as ridiculous as everyone is saying; but they&#8217;re meant to be.  It&#8217;s a dark comedy.  The main character is a sex addict, who has multiple disturbing and distasteful sexual encounters over the course of the book.  The scenes are partly from Bunny Munro&#8217;s point of view, and none of them are supposed to read as sexy or arousing.  Descriptions such as &#8220;nipples like liquorice jelly spogs&#8221; are meant to show his extreme obsession with female body parts.  </p>
<p>As the book progresses, the reader realizes more and more that Bunny is not just a philanderer, but a sexist and sexual predator who&#8217;s deeply sick.  &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to miss the misogyny in those authors&#8217; works&#8221;?  I read it as a powerful *critique* of misogyny, since it reveals the bizarre mindset that would lead a man to victimize women (while thinking all the while that he&#8217;s a charming playboy, as Bunny does throughout the book).</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read these other books so I can&#8217;t speak about them.  But using tacky, over-the-top language doesn&#8217;t always equal &#8220;bad writing,&#8221; since authors often use irony or speak in their characters&#8217; voices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: efink</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2009/12/bad-sex-in-fiction-award-nominees-all-male/comment-page-1/#comment-6233</link>
		<dc:creator>efink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=13928#comment-6233</guid>
		<description>Difficult to believe that Nick Cave didn&#039;t win. The quotes from him are truly horrendous. Though the bit about the soft-boiled (is that a giveaway right there?) egg is likewise pretty awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Difficult to believe that Nick Cave didn&#8217;t win. The quotes from him are truly horrendous. Though the bit about the soft-boiled (is that a giveaway right there?) egg is likewise pretty awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

