<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The NYSBA Sponsors Panel of Men Opining on Women&#8217;s  &#8220;Strengths and Weaknesses&#8221; as Lawyers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/</link>
	<description>Nearly all of us root for fairness, not for our own sex. - Nicholas Kristof</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:26:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The New York State Bar&#8217;s Approach to Teaching Women Communication Skills&#8211;Are You Kidding Me?</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6585</link>
		<dc:creator>The New York State Bar&#8217;s Approach to Teaching Women Communication Skills&#8211;Are You Kidding Me?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6585</guid>
		<description>[...] for the upcoming meeting next week,Â this is stillÂ a doozy.Â  Here is Bridget Crawford from the Feminist Law Prof blog last week: The Committee on Women in the Law is sponsoring a program called&quot;Weathering Tough [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the upcoming meeting next week,Â this is stillÂ a doozy.Â  Here is Bridget Crawford from the Feminist Law Prof blog last week: The Committee on Women in the Law is sponsoring a program called&#8221;Weathering Tough [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Not to Do &#171; Feminist Philosophers</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>What Not to Do &#171; Feminist Philosophers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6584</guid>
		<description>[...] has apparently been quite a bit of criticism.  &#160;  Leave a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has apparently been quite a bit of criticism.  &nbsp;  Leave a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Work: Ur Doin it Rong - The Pursuit of Harpyness</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator>Work: Ur Doin it Rong - The Pursuit of Harpyness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6581</guid>
		<description>[...] what? A little bit of outrage ensued, and the NYSBA responded by adding a few ladylawyers to the panel and issuing a passive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what? A little bit of outrage ensued, and the NYSBA responded by adding a few ladylawyers to the panel and issuing a passive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6568</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6568</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting the above. We - law students, especially - need to hear these stories, simply to be reminded of the many courageous  women who paved the way for us. We stand on their shoulders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting the above. We &#8211; law students, especially &#8211; need to hear these stories, simply to be reminded of the many courageous  women who paved the way for us. We stand on their shoulders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ninakraut</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6566</link>
		<dc:creator>ninakraut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6566</guid>
		<description>My mother -- a 70+ year member of the NY State Bar -- was a 1936 graduate of NYU Law.  She was among the top 5 in her graduating night school class.  A professor recommended her to White &amp; Case.  Their response: they had their quota of women and Jews.  She went on to a stellar career, first in NYC as Tax Editor at the Research Institute of America, where she worked with Leo Cherne and was, for a time, Bill Casey&#039;s boss, and then in Dutchess County where she started the Dutchess County Legal Aid Society in about 1950.  Discrimination of one kind or another dogged her for a good chunk of time, but she pressed on.  She was a wonderful mentor, not only to me, but to a hoard of other young women who wanted to be lawyers.  She died 3 years ago, at age 98.  I can feel her in my bones, turning over in her grave at this outlandish, outrageous panel of the NYState Bar, an organization she truly loved, but one which, I think, she&#039;d be appalled at today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mother &#8212; a 70+ year member of the NY State Bar &#8212; was a 1936 graduate of NYU Law.  She was among the top 5 in her graduating night school class.  A professor recommended her to White &amp; Case.  Their response: they had their quota of women and Jews.  She went on to a stellar career, first in NYC as Tax Editor at the Research Institute of America, where she worked with Leo Cherne and was, for a time, Bill Casey&#8217;s boss, and then in Dutchess County where she started the Dutchess County Legal Aid Society in about 1950.  Discrimination of one kind or another dogged her for a good chunk of time, but she pressed on.  She was a wonderful mentor, not only to me, but to a hoard of other young women who wanted to be lawyers.  She died 3 years ago, at age 98.  I can feel her in my bones, turning over in her grave at this outlandish, outrageous panel of the NYState Bar, an organization she truly loved, but one which, I think, she&#8217;d be appalled at today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6548</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6548</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by FeministLawPrfs: NYSBA to sponsor panel of men talking about women&#039;s &quot;strengths and weaknesses as lawyers.&quot; Huh? http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by FeministLawPrfs: NYSBA to sponsor panel of men talking about women&#8217;s &#8220;strengths and weaknesses as lawyers.&#8221; Huh? <a href="http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522.." rel="nofollow">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephaniewickouski</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>stephaniewickouski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>A boycott isn&#039;t strong enough - unless all the women boycott paying their bar dues, that is!!  The NYSBA should pull the program completely. Or better yet - ask them to send around a program description exactly like the last one, only changing &quot;gentlemen&quot; to &quot;ladies&quot;, and &quot;women&quot; to &quot;men&quot;. Or, better still, change &quot;gentlemen&quot; to &quot;whites&quot; and &quot;women&quot; to &quot;blacks&quot;.  The reaction to the former would be comical, to the latter, explosive. I am somewhere between comical and explosive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A boycott isn&#8217;t strong enough &#8211; unless all the women boycott paying their bar dues, that is!!  The NYSBA should pull the program completely. Or better yet &#8211; ask them to send around a program description exactly like the last one, only changing &#8220;gentlemen&#8221; to &#8220;ladies&#8221;, and &#8220;women&#8221; to &#8220;men&#8221;. Or, better still, change &#8220;gentlemen&#8221; to &#8220;whites&#8221; and &#8220;women&#8221; to &#8220;blacks&#8221;.  The reaction to the former would be comical, to the latter, explosive. I am somewhere between comical and explosive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Increasing Diversity by Abandoning Discrimination &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6543</link>
		<dc:creator>Increasing Diversity by Abandoning Discrimination &#124; Maryland Employment Law Developments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6543</guid>
		<description>[...] One blogger, Bridget Crawford, was incensed, and stated as follows: I call for all members of the NYSBA to boycott this panel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One blogger, Bridget Crawford, was incensed, and stated as follows: I call for all members of the NYSBA to boycott this panel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David S. Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6534</link>
		<dc:creator>David S. Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6534</guid>
		<description>Are we in the 1920s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we in the 1920s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Burke</title>
		<link>http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/2010/01/the-nysba-sponsors-panel-of-men-opining-on-womens-strengths-and-weakenesses-as-lawyers/comment-page-1/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feministlawprofessors.com/?p=14522#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>Ironically, the panel discussion is being held under the heading of the Edith Spivack Symposium. Spivack herself was a pioneer for women in New York law and achieved many &quot;firsts&quot; as a female attorney. 

Perhaps the NYSBA Committee on Women should consider replacing the distinguished gentlemen with a panel discussion on consciousness-raising and its relevance today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, the panel discussion is being held under the heading of the Edith Spivack Symposium. Spivack herself was a pioneer for women in New York law and achieved many &#8220;firsts&#8221; as a female attorney. </p>
<p>Perhaps the NYSBA Committee on Women should consider replacing the distinguished gentlemen with a panel discussion on consciousness-raising and its relevance today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

