Why did David Brooks feel the need to churn out another concern-trolling column urging women to choose marriage over career success?

Post to Twitter

Historiann contemplated that question here.

–Ann Bartow

Share
This entry was posted in Feminism and Culture, If you're a woman, Sexism in the Media. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Why did David Brooks feel the need to churn out another concern-trolling column urging women to choose marriage over career success?

  1. David S. Cohen says:

    Answer: because that’s his stock in trade! See, e.g., http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=478 and the others linked in it.

  2. SMottet says:

    I think another good question is why this piece was written about Sandra Bullock and not Donald Trump, who is perhaps a better example of someone who is successful in his career and unsuccessful in his marital relationships. The double standard – in which the success of a woman is measured more heavily by the her relatiobships and the success of a man is measured more heavily by his career – weakens his point. If his point is that marital happiness is more important than a successful career, then a man would be a better example. Otherwise, it is just one more women-should-go-home-where-they-belong piece.

Comments are closed.