The Book Stank!

The Little Professor” writes:

“Picture me, innocently arriving home on a pleasant (for upstate NY) winter’s day, greeted by an envelope that clearly contains a book.   Books, of course, are frequent visitors at my humble abode, but there is always room for one more.   (Well, strictly speaking, there isn’t always room for one more.   Still,   I try to observe the code of hospitality whenever a wandering book is concerned.)   I tote the envelope over to my dining room table and–ably assisted by the resident felines, who always materialize when there’s a package to be investigated–I open the envelope.

“Two things immediately call themselves to my attention.   The first is that, yes, there is an old book in this envelope.   The second is that even packed up in its protective wrappings, the book exudes an odor somewhat akin to the dirty socks worn by a marathon runner who has just finished a race in Arizona.   In the middle of the summer, no less.   Matters fail to improve for my poor proboscis once the book is fully denuded of the surrounding tissues; in fact, they fail to improve after I move several feet away from the offending object.   Even the cats, looking dismayed, head for parts south.”   ….

Read the rest here. “The Little Professor” is a great blog for book lovers as well as thoughtful feminist academics.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminists in Academia | Comments Off on The Book Stank!

Another “Humorless Feminist”?

Click on this link to read Shakespeare’s Sister’s critique of tee shirst that “joke” about rape. She credits Jessica at Feministing with bringing them to her attention.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Another “Humorless Feminist”?

Kate Michelman Has Written a Memoir: “With Liberty and Justice for All: A Life Spent Protecting the Right to Choose”

kate.jpg

From the first chapter:

…”This is a book about one woman’s choice–my choice–how I came to terms with it, how I came to believe reproductive rights were central to women’s and children’s well-being, and how we can continue to create and sustain the conditions in which women and children can flourish.

“It is also a book about liberty and justice. The liberty to pursue our dreams, the freedom from government intereference in the most personal aspects of our lives. And the justice of a society that values and supports every child and respects the rights of every person, no matter who they are, what they believe, or how much money they have.

“This is a book about liberty and justice for women. But everyone’s rights are at stake. If the government may interfere in the private lives of some of our citizens, everyone’s privacy is threatened. If the government bans abortion and forces women to bear children against their will, or if we fail to support and cherish the choice to have a child, the fabric of our society is at risk. The ramifications of a woman’s freedom to choose reach far beyond a single issue.” …

You can listen to an interview with Michelman conducted by Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Law, Recommended Books, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Kate Michelman Has Written a Memoir: “With Liberty and Justice for All: A Life Spent Protecting the Right to Choose”

Hillary Clinton and “Anger”

Scott Moss writes:

“[Consider the implicit sexism of] Republican National Chair Ken Mehlman’s statement, “Hillary Clinton seems to have a lot of anger.”  

“Hillary always struck me as quite un-impassioned for such an icon of the left, in contrast to, say, Russ Feingold, Ted Kennedy, or the post-defeat John Kerry. Also, since when is the Republican party free of “anger”? Last I heard, their 2008 front-runners are John McCain and Rudy Giuliani, two of the bigger hotheads in American politics. Criticizing the “anger” of a prominent woman — one who in fact displays less “anger” than so many of her peers at the top of American politics — seems like the old gender double-standard: gotta be tough enough to prove you can play on traditionally male turf, but not so tough you seem too strikingly gender-inappropriate.”
Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Hillary Clinton and “Anger”

Judge Rosalyn Higgins Elected First Female President of the International Court of Justice

Stephanie Farrior reports:

“Judge Rosalyn Higgins of the United Kingdom has just been elected President of the International Court of Justice. The President is elected by the fifteen judges who sit on the Court. She is not only the first woman to be elected President of the court, but she is still the only woman ever to sit on this court in its 60-year history. Judge Higgins was first elected to the ICJ in 1995.

“Judge Higgins is author of one of my very favorite books on international law, one that I recommend to my students every year: Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (1994). Brilliant insights; highly readable.

“Here is the ICJ press release announcing the election of Judge Higgins as President of the Court, which includes information about her background.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Law | Comments Off on Judge Rosalyn Higgins Elected First Female President of the International Court of Justice

Recalling Shulamith Firestone’s 1968 Essay: THE WOMEN’S RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN THE U.S.A.: NEW VIEW

“What does the word ‘feminism’ bring to mind? A granite faced spinster obsessed with a vote? Or a George Sand in cigar and bloomers, a woman against nature? Chances are that whatever image you have, it is a negative one. To be called a feminist has become an insult, so much so that a young woman intellectual, often radical in every other area, will deny vehemently that she is a feminist, will be ashamed to identify in any way with the early women’s movement, calling it cop-out or reformist or demeaning it politically without knowing even the little that is circulated about it. Indeed, the few historians of the women’s rights movement in the U.S. complain that the records have been lost, damaged, or scattered due to the little value placed on them. Anyone who as ever researched the subject knows how little is available, and how superficial, slanted, or downright false is the existing information.

“I would like to suggest a reason for this. It is the thesis of this article that women’s rights (liberation, if you prefer) has dynamite revolutionary potential; that the Nineteenth Century WRM 1 was indeed a radical movement from the start, that it was tied up with the most radical movements and ideas of its day, and that even to the bitter end, in 1920, there was a strong radical strain which as been purposely ignored and buried. To show this, we will have to dig out and completely review the whole history of the WRM in the U.S., to weigh just what it meant in political terms, and to understand the political and economic interests causing these distortions. ….”

Read the rest here. Though the essay is 37 years old, some of Firestone’s observations remain remarkably trenchant today.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off on Recalling Shulamith Firestone’s 1968 Essay: THE WOMEN’S RIGHTS MOVEMENT IN THE U.S.A.: NEW VIEW

David Horowitz Names “The 101 Most Dangerous Professors in America”

Once again, women appear to be grossly underrepresented, so if you see Horowitz, make every effort to frighten him, so as to appear in future editions of his book. Kudos to feminist law prof Regina Austin for making the list, though!

Update: See also Michael Berube, another list-maker.

Share
Posted in Feminists in Academia, Law Schools | Comments Off on David Horowitz Names “The 101 Most Dangerous Professors in America”

“Online test reveals conscious and subconscious biases”

From Diane Levin at Online Guide To Mediation:

“…Mediators like myself in particular are intrigued by tests that probe for hidden biases or reveal subconscious tendencies. This is in large measure due to how integral impartiality is to the role we play: cultivating self-awareness becomes critical to fulfilling that role.

“One of the most provocative online tests can be found at the web site for Project Implicit, a collaborative research project undertaken by researchers at Harvard University, the University of Washington, and the University of Virginia. This research project utilizes online tests to gather information about and gain insights into conscious and unconscious preferences on a wide range of topics, including religion, sexuality, gender, race, and even U.S. presidents.

“You can view a demonstration here.

“By the way, if you’re on the lookout for online negotiation and conflict resolution games, tools, and tests, click on the titles of the following articles that have appeared on this blog in the past:

It’s how you play the game: Online negotiation games provide entertainment and challenge

Cooperation or competition: The prisoner’s dilemma and game theory

Winner take all: Games, game theory, and conflict resolution

It’s starting to add up: Math teams with mediation to resolve disputes online

Test of character: Using instruments to probe conflict styles and moral intuition.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Online test reveals conscious and subconscious biases”

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

feminist.jpg

Via The Nest.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on

Bridget Crawford’s Report from Yale’s “Sex for Sale” Symposium

“On Saturday, February 4, 2006, I attended the “Sex for Sale” symposium sponsored by the Yale Journal of Law & Feminism. It was a well-run and intellectually rich conference, organized around two panels. I’ll give an incomplete account of some the presenters’ main points, and interested blog readers might want to look for the webcast, which should be posted to the conference website shortly.

“The morning panel on prostitution was moderated by Yale Law Professor Vicki Schultz. Norma Hotaling, the founder of Standing Against Global Exploitation (SAGE) spoke about the importance of recovering the stories of those who have been victimized by the sex trade. Her program provides mental health, alcohol treatment and other programs for men and women trying to escape the sex trade. Melissa Farley of Prostitution Education and Research delivered a talk entitled, “Feminism and Cultural Amnesia,” criticizing the view that prostitution is a “job.” She points to the violent nature of prostitution, the emotional damage done to prostituted women and the ways that racism and class prejudice are institutionalized in prostitution. Kathleen Bergin of South Texas College of Law presented her research project, “Sexualized Advocacy: The Ascendant Feminist Backlash,” which examines the pitfalls (and perceived advantages) of sexualized appearance of female attorneys. Ann McGinley of the William S. Boyd School of Law, UNLV, gave an update on her research on women in the casino industry. She suggests that failure to protect women from sexual harassment and violence in their jobs as blackjack dealers, cocktail waitresses, exotic dancers and prostitutes effectively denies women the opportunity to participate in these jobs. Rhacel Parrenas of the University of California at Davis detailed her research on Filipina migrant hostesses in Tokyo and questioned the extent to which United States policies fail to fully account for the way these women are trafficked because of the conditions of their employment. Before taking questions from the audience, Vicki Schultz asked panelists to consider whether feminists are critical of sex work because of the sale of sex itself, or because of the many surrounding conditions in which sex is
sold.

“The afternoon panel on pornography was moderated by Yale Law Professor William Eskridge, Jr.. I started off with a discussion of third wave feminism and its potential contribution to the feminist conversation about pornography. Gail Dines of Wheelock College described her research on the way that the black male body is
fetishized in pornography. Michael Lucas talked about how gay pornography differs from heterosexual pornography and articulated his view that gay pornography has many positive aspects. Donn Short from Osgoode Hall Law School, Toronto described why he believes that the traditional feminist harms-based analysis should not be applied to gay pornography. Celine Parrenas Shimizu from the University of California at Santa Barbara spoke of specific Asian women’s experiences using self-produced pornography as a way of challenging and complicating the hypersexualized image of Asian women. Tristan Taormino explained how government regulations place a burden on independent and feminist pornographers who make collaborative films that seek to empower women and men. Bill Eskridge asked panelists about the intersection between pornography and social attitudes before taking questions from the audience.

“After both panels, there were break-out sessions on topics such as the connection between pornography and prostitution, methods of sex research and academic theorizing and the effects of pornography. The keynote address was delivered by Viviana Zelizer of Princeton University. It was a great conference!”

Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Feminists in Academia | Comments Off on Bridget Crawford’s Report from Yale’s “Sex for Sale” Symposium

NEW POLL SHOWS CORRELATION IS CAUSATION

“WASHINGTON (AP) The results of a new survey conducted by pollsters suggest that, contrary to common scientific wisdom, correlation does in fact imply causation. The highly reputable source, Gallup Polls, Inc., surveyed 1009 Americans during the month of October and asked them, “Do you believe correlation implies causation?” An overwhelming 64% of American’s answered “YES”, while only 38% replied “NO”. Another 8% were undecided. This result threatens to shake the foundations of both the scientific and mainstream community.

“It is really a mandate from the people.” commented one pundit who wished to remain anonymous. “It says that The American People are sick and tired of the scientific mumbo-jumbo that they keep trying to shove down our throats, and want some clear rules about what to believe. Now that correlation implies causation, not only is everything easier to understand, it also shows that even Science must answer to the will of John and Jane Q. Public.”

“Others are excited because this new, important result actually gives insight into why the result occurred in the first place. “If you look at the numbers over the past two decades, you can see that Americans have been placing less and less faith in the old maxim ‘Correlation is not Causation’ as time progresses.” explained pollster and pop media icon Sarah Purcell. “Now, with the results of the latest poll, we are able to determine that people’s lack of belief in correlation not being causal has caused correlation to now become causal. It is a real advance in the
field of meta-epistemology.” ….

Read the rest here. I’m *pretty* sure it is satire.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on NEW POLL SHOWS CORRELATION IS CAUSATION

The Passing of Betty Friedan

friedan.184.jpg

There are many homages to her wonderful feminist contributions all over the web, see e.g. this, this, this, this, this (a nice obit at Yahoo, but run next to an advertisement for cellulite cream – ugh), this, this and this. See also this, and this too, which is mostly homage but reminds the reader that Friedan was imperfect.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on The Passing of Betty Friedan

Bra Blogging

Last December Bitch Ph.D. ran two posts about bras: Girly stuff: the Ultimate Bra Post, and More Bra Advice–from a Bra Wizard, no less. The posts and the comments they elicited provide a wealth of advice and opinions about bras.

This morning, NPR’s Weekend Edition ran a story called “Now on Fifth Avenue: Japanese Custom Bras” (click on the link to listen if you didn’t hear it, and still want to after reading the rest of this). NPR’s blurb description of the story is: A Japanese boutique on Fifth Avenue in New York specializes in customized bras. The owner feels American women don’t pay enough attention to the bra as a supportive device.”

One notable reaction to that story was provided by "Julie O'Doom" at feminist_rage, reposted below in its entirety because the link is wonky and an excerpt just doesn't do it justice:

"Okay, so I'm half-awake and half-paying attention to NPR when suddenly a story about bras, of all things, comes on. It's about this woman who makes custom bras that sound really scary and creepy, which actually change the shape of the breast and are really, really tight. The reporter compares them to a brace or orthopedic shoes. And the lady who makes these bras is going on and on about how if you don't wear them you'll "look older than you are" and all kinds of really awful shit about how you need to shape your breasts to make them look more pleasing. How you have to "train" them to take a different shape. And how if you don't wear a bra you're ruining your life or something.

"After the first couple of seconds of this I was livid. I hear this bullshit too much from random people around me all the time. I expect better from NPR (perhaps foolishly). WHY THE HELL DOES EVERYONE CARE ABOUT MY BOOBS? I hate bras. Hate hate hate hate hate. They're uncomfortable and I think I look better without one. I've got really big breasts (in proportion to my body, anyway), so I'm not one of those girls people always say can "get away" with not wearing one. I feel better when I don't wear one. If I'm not wearing clothes that show my chest or breasts at all, (you know, what people would call "modest", except I hate that word--too patriarchal, too religiously loaded) and I happen not to be wearing a bra underneath...why does it matter? The fabric may not be thick enough to totally hide that fact, but...you can't see my breasts at all. Even if I were wearing a bra, you could still see my nipples, so that can't be it... Hmmmm.....OH WAIT. There's no good reason why anyone should care at all unless I am literally falling out of my shirt and flashing everybody. Which, surprisingly enough, somehow, even when I'm wearing low-cut shirts, NEVER HAPPENS.

"But aside from people dictating my clothing to me and insisting I have to wear it or...I'll explode. Or they'll explode when they look at me. Or my boobs will sag and THEN explode! OR ALL THREE. Uh, yeah, aside from that, I just want to know what exactly it is about the natural shape of the female breast which needs to be fixed? If one has to wear a complicated contraption to make them take a certain shape (and only temporarily, and only while you're still wearing it), wouldn't that say that is not a
natural shape, not normal, not the standard. I'm not perfect, I've got a big ass, I have acne. And I'm OKAY WITH THAT. Really, I actually like myself. I know, it's terrible, because I'm obviously so nasty and flawed the way I naturally am. And heaven forbid I AGE and actually LOOK OLD when I am old. Apparently, this is a fate worse than death. Whatever.

"And just worse than all this pressure and cultural misogyny is the fact that I KNOW if I just dress the way I like, perfectly modestly, perhaps even looking professional, and people can tell, or guess I'm not wearing a bra...THEY WILL JUDGE ME. My underwear choices are none of your fucking business, client, coworker, random bystander, even my friends! GAH. IF YOU ALL CARE SO MUCH YOU'RE WELCOME TO GO WEAR YOUR TORTURE DEVICE, JUST LEAVE MY POOR BREASTS OUT OF IT. There is literally no way to go braless and have it NOT become a feminist issue. (I think the decision not to shave is similar.) What if I just want to dress how I feel most physically comfortable and I don't want it to be about politics? I'm a big dykey feminist and all, but once and a while, when it comes to stupid little things like my goddamn underwear, you'd think I wouldn't have to defend it. But no. If you don't make it into a feminist decision, other people will force you to through their stupidity and judgment of you, until you turn to feminist critique to a) defend yourself and b) determine why the hell they feel so entitled, or why they care.

"I suppose this just goes to show how pervasive patriarchy is. All the way down to our underclothes. Past that, all the way down to your skin. After all, the reason you have to wear the bra is because otherwise, people might see what you actually look like. Fuck."

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Bra Blogging

From Stone Court: “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Good for Walgreens Edition

As reported by “Fred Vincy” at the Stone Court blog:

“As women in Massachusetts are forced to go to court to require Walmart to carry emergency contraception, and as corporate insensitivity to the need for ready access to EC becomes so great that Target earns praise for requiring pharmacists to fill EC prescriptions or refer them to other pharmacists, Walgreens deserves credit for telling its pharmacists, Just do your job and fill customer prescriptions. Of course, Walgreens is not getting praised, it’s getting sued:

On Friday, the American Center for Law and Justice filed a lawsuit in Madison County against Walgreens on behalf of four pharmacists who were suspended without pay after voicing opposition to the company’s policy on dispensing the “Plan B” pills because of their personal beliefs.

Walgreens requires all of its Illinois pharmacists to dispense Plan B pills as mandated by Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s new state rule, said Michael Polzin, a spokesman for Walgreens. The rule, which is the only one of its kind in the nation, requires that all Illinois pharmacies dispense contraceptives without delay.

“According to the state rule, the prescription must be filled at the same time that it would take to fill a normal prescription. At 5 p.m., that average time is 45 minutes; at 2 a.m. it takes about 5 minutes,” Polzin said. “It doesn’t give us the option of having a pharmacist on call.”

Other major retail pharmacies have not interpreted the order the way Walgreens has, said a statement from Francis J. Manion, senior counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice. The center is a public interest law firm based in Washington, D.C., founded by evangelist Pat Robertson.

“For whatever reason, Walgreens chose not to respect its pharmacists,” Manion said. “That’s why we’re going to court.”

“I may be going to the new Walgreens in my neighborhood more than I thought….

“Related Posts: “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Wal-Mart Edition; “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Pro-Choice … For Pharmacists … Edition; “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Pontificating Edition; “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Texas Edition; “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Georgia Edition; “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Mississippi Edition.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on From Stone Court: “Conscience is but a word that cowards use….”, Good for Walgreens Edition

Feminism Through Fan Fiction?

Two provocative essays from Schemingreader: Something Good About Fandom and Women Writing Slash: An Idiosyncratically Feminist Meditation. Here is an excerpt from the first piece:

…. “Take for example, the massive Harry Potter fandom in which I am a participant, since it’s the largest and most obvious manifestation of this phenomenon. When Jo Rowling wrote her first Harry Potter book, we were all thinking like Muggles. That is, we thought: “Here’s a nice book for children that adults can enjoy, too.” We didn’t think: “Oh, look, another franchise opportunity for Harry Potter movies, t-shirts, calendars, video games, figurines…”

“I’m sure Jo isn’t sorry that her lovely little book became an international media phenomenon, but it does do something negative to our experience as readers. Between the movies and the media images, we are left with an ultra-canonical reading, a single way to interpret a book. Indeed, to some extent, a single way to interpret the experience of reading. When you write stories that recast the Harry Potter characters and plot, you enter into the process of interpretation and take the reins of the story into your own hands.

“Just think what you are messing with when you write stories about television programs. The whole medium is designed to keep you salivating for hamburgers and weight-loss programs. You aren’t buying the messages of enforced passive consumption of entertainment when you decide that you can use a shared audience experience as a stage on which to create. I don’t participate in any TV fandoms, but I think they are in some respects the most revolutionary thing going.

“You might think: “Oh, we are ripping off someone else’s characters, taking their intellectual property.” Take a long view, though. Look at the King Arthur stories and the spin-offs they spawned in the eleventh century. People all over Europe were retelling the stories of the Knights of the Round Table. The whole problem with mass media is that it makes artists’ livelihoods contingent on killing their art. It used to be that songwriters sold their sheet music, not their recorded performances. We have commodified the entire experience of making art. In some respect, fan fiction and fan art stand against all of that.” ….

Via Official Shrub.com Blog.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Feminism Through Fan Fiction?

Yale Journal of Law and Feminism to Hold “Sex for Sale” Conference, Feb. 4

The Yale Journal of Law and Feminism will host a one-day conference on the commodification and sale of sex, titled “Sex for Sale,” on February 4, 2006, at Yale Law School.

More information, including a conference schedule, is available at the conference website.

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Yale Journal of Law and Feminism to Hold “Sex for Sale” Conference, Feb. 4

Center For Reproductive Rights Hosting Equality and Reproductive Rights Symposium, March 2006

columbia.jpg

More information available here.

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Center For Reproductive Rights Hosting Equality and Reproductive Rights Symposium, March 2006