Just Because You Are Paranoid…

Following up on the “On Astroturfing and Paid Shills” post below:

One of the scariest articles I ever read was an expose published by Salon in 2001 called The Greatest Vendetta on Earth, by Jeff Stein. Part I is here. Part II is here. It describes how the Feld Entertainment company hired former CIA operatives to engage in dirty tricks campaigns against its “enemies,” including an eight year campaign of terror against a solitary and not particularly well-resourced freelance writer. Here are the first paragraphs of this long, detailed, compelling and frightening article:

On a gloomy Veterans Day in 1998, Janice Pottker answered an unexpected knock on the door of her home in Potomac, Md., a woodsy, upscale suburb of Washington. Standing there was a man she’d never seen before, a private detective who introduced himself as Tim Tieff. He told Pottker, a freelance writer married to a senior government official, that he had a discreet message from Charles F. Smith, a former top executive with Feld Entertainment, owner of the Ringling Brothers-Barnum & Bailey Circuses, Disney Shows on Ice, and other subsidiaries that make it the largest live entertainment company in the world.

Smith wanted to see her, he said.

It had to have been startling news for Pottker, who had written a controversial, 11,000-word piece on the circus and its colorful owners, Washington’s Feld family, for a local business magazine in 1990. Her piece had recounted the Feld family’s Horatio Alger-like story, but it had also exposed some unpleasant secrets about the famously tight-lipped Felds — such as a bitter feud that had broken out between the two chief heirs, and the bisexuality of the family’s patriarch, Irvin Feld. The circus had refused to talk to her ever since.

Ever since, Pottker had been trying, and failing, to get a book off the ground about the circus. But nothing had ever seemed to jell. Promising magazine assignments about the circus’s questionable treatment of its performing children and the care of its animals had been derailed. Congressional and Labor Department interest in the subjects, which she’d spurred, evaporated. Now, out of the blue, a former top Feld official had sent a message saying he would like to meet with her. Would she agree?

In a New York minute. For years, Smith had been the right-hand man of Ken Feld, who had inherited the circus when his entrepreneurial father died in 1984. But Smith had been fired 18 months earlier. Now he was apparently ready to spill the beans.

The next day, Pottker sped off to meet Smith in nearby Chevy Chase. But if she had expectations that the former executive wanted to talk about child acrobats and performing elephants, she was in for an intensely personal shock. Smith was there to talk about what Feld Entertainment had done to her.

Over lunch, Smith recounted a campaign of surveillance and dirty tricks Feld had unleashed on her in the wake of her 1990 magazine piece in the now-defunct Regardie’s magazine. Feld, he said, had hired people to manipulate her whole life over the past eight years. Feld had spent a lot of money on it, he said. He may have even tried to destroy her marriage. In fact, Pottker would eventually learn of a massive dirty tricks operation, involving former CIA officials and operatives, that would target Ringling enemies such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and other groups, not just Pottker.

For proof, he told her to go to federal court in Alexandria, Va., and look at a suit he had filed against Ken Feld. In that suit, she would find an affidavit from a man named Clair George with attachments. Those, he told her, are all about you.

And then Smith left.

The next day, Jan Pottker and her husband went to the Colonial-style courthouse in Alexandria and asked for Smith vs. Feld, civil action case number 98-357-A. They opened the files and found the affidavit Smith had described.

“My name is Clair E. George,” it began. “I was the deputy director for operations (DDO) of the Central Intelligence Agency from July 1984 through December 1987 during which time I was responsible for the CIA’s covert operations worldwide.” In 1990, when Pottker’s article was published, George declared, he was “a paid consultant to Feld Entertainment and its affiliates on international issues.”

Pottker may not have known it — she declined to be interviewed for this story — but Clair George had been the CIA’s third-highest ranking official until he was convicted of lying to a congressional committee in 1987. President Bush, the current president’s father, himself a former CIA chief, had pardoned Clair George on Christmas Eve 1992.

Feld, George’s affidavit continued, was “concerned” about Pottker’s article, and so he set out to find out what else she was up to. “Subsequently,” he wrote in the sworn statement, “I obtained an outline for a proposed unauthorized biography of Mr. Feld and his family by Pottker.”

That, according to George’s affidavit, is how it all began. Over the next eight years, “I undertook a series of efforts to find out what Pottker was doing and reported on the results of my work to Mr. Feld. I was paid for this work by Feld Entertainment or its affiliates. I prepared my reports in writing and presented them to Mr. Feld in personal meetings.”

Spying on her, though, was the least of what George admitted. “I was assigned to make arrangements with a publishing house to publish a book by Pottker on another subject to divert her from her proposed book on Mr. Feld,” George revealed. That was “an unauthorized biography of the Mars family, ‘Crisis in Candyland, the Mars Story.'”

Pottker had, in fact, written “Crisis in Candyland,” which was published in 1995 by the tiny and little-known National Press Books. It soon disappeared from the shelves.

“This,” George continued, “had the result of diverting Pottker for a period from further efforts to publish materials that were of concern to Mr. Feld.” At the same time, George said, he’d made arrangements to pay other writers for an “authorized … favorable book concerning Mr. Feld,” to be published should Pottker succeed, despite George’s efforts, to get her own book on the circus published. It turned out to be unnecessary.

The final paragraph of George’s affidavit was a stunner, too. It suggested Feld had set up a special unit, much like the Watergate “plumbers,” to destroy anyone who threatened the image of the circus as wholesome fun for the whole family, not to mention a conscientious custodian of animals and circus children. It was headed by one Richard Froemming, one of Feld’s executive vice presidents, George swore. His main target was People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), and similar groups that had annoyed Feld with charges that the Ringling Bros.’ elephants were badly cared for.

“As part of my work for Feld Entertainment,” George wrote, “I was also asked to review reports from Richard Froemming and his organizations based on their surveillance of, and efforts to counter, the activities of various animal rights groups. I have discussed these reports in meetings in which Mr. Feld was present.”

The former CIA spy master concluded by stating, “I swear under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.”

You really need to read this if you haven’t, because the “adult entertainment industry” has a lot to gain from derailing and/or capturing feminism, and a lot of resources to work with.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Just Because You Are Paranoid…

“geek grrls: the next generation”

Jennifer Ouellette is publicizing an initiative to get girls and young women interested in science:

The Feminist Press, in collaboration with The National Science Foundation, is exploring new ways to get girls and young women interested in science. While there are many library resources featuring biographies of women scientists that are suitable for school reports, these are rarely the books that girls seek out themselves to read for pleasure. What would a book, or series of books, about science that girls really want to read look like? That is the question we want to answer.

You’ll find several requests for specific proposals at our website. One calls for scientific detective stories based on the life, research, and discoveries of real women scientists. Another calls for stories featuring real young women:aspiring gymnasts, ice skaters, actors, dancers–using a knowledge of science to help them become really good at what they do. A third recognizes how popular Manga and graphic novels are with girls, and asks for imaginative new collaborations between Manga writers and artists to create adventures about girls who use real science to accomplish their goals. If any of these three book ideas interest you, please check out our website (www.feministpress.org) for more information about deadline and how to submit proposals.

Via Creek Running North.

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “geek grrls: the next generation”

Sex and the Empowerful Woman

Two recent posts by Twisty Faster at “I Blame the Patriarchy” provide fairly compelling, if not jump-startling, reading for the summer-stupified academic brain: Sports, Corsetry, and the Empowerful Woman and Sex. Here’s an excerpt from Sex:

Radical feminists are not the enemy. We’re not even a bunch of homely old frigid prudes jealous of all the hot sex we’re not getting. Patriarchy is the real sex police. By convincing you that you’re hot when you cave in to its psycho demands, it has turned you into its slave.”Well, what of it?”you say.”What I choose to (a) do in the sack or (b) wear to work or (c) have implanted in my chest is none of your beeswax.”

Perhaps not, but, well, it’s just that certain of your so-called choices are making the whole group look bad. Men appear to have gotten the impression that women are not, you know, quite as entitled as men are. So they’ve institutionalized ‘beauty,’ dieting, cosmetic surgery, sexual harassment, wife-beating, and rape, to name but a few of the thousand unnatural shocks female flesh is heir to. We’re blaming the patriarchy, not you, but really, mightn’t it be time to step up?

“Examine your lives!”is the Twisty refrain. Don’t forget that, as a member of an oppressed class, everything you do is political. So what say you reevaluate those phony, misogynist feminine constructs? Every tube of lipstick, every coy little head-tilt, every train-yourself-not-to-gag-while-deep-throating-a-flaccid-bratwurst session is a symbol of oppression. And not just your oppression, either, but the oppression of all women. And they’re not just symbols, either, but concrete evidence of your collaboration with the dominant culture. Every time you ‘choose’ to totter down the street in a pair of heels and a pencil skirt you’re a Yay Patriarchy billboard. It says”I willingly brand myself as different from and subordinate to men. Shall I bend over now?”

Share
Posted in Feminist Blogs Of Interest | Comments Off on Sex and the Empowerful Woman

The Economist: Dictator Not All Bad; He Paid For the Teenage Girls He Took

In its obituary of former Paraguayan dictator Alfredo Stroessner, The Economist acknowledges the torture, “disappearances” and other human rights violations that were rampant under his rule. But The Economist also thinks the dictator had his redeeming features, writing:

There was some resistance. The Catholic church got restive, especially when the general ignored calls for land reform from the indigenous poor. The Americans, fed up at last with his wiliness and his human-rights abuses, began to part company with him in the late 1970s. Paraguayans as a whole, however, were much slower to be disillusioned. It was true that he treated the country as his fief, to the point of picking out teenage girls for himself when he presented school diplomas; but he paid for the girls, set them up in houses, and gave their relatives money.

I had to read this line in The Economist several times to make sure they actually wrote what they did, I was so taken aback. It seems that paying for human beings renders abduction and rape acceptable. And apparently, since the dictator was “setting them up in houses,” the teenage girls should have no cause for complaint. Like Persephone, forever doomed to time in Hades for having partaken of pomegranate while trapped in hell.

–Stephanie Farrior

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The Economist: Dictator Not All Bad; He Paid For the Teenage Girls He Took

KC Sheehan: “Caring for Deconstruction”

Feminist law prof KC Sheehan notes that after a lapse of only 6 years she has posted her article “Caring for Deconstruction” here on on SSRN. According to KC: “The article points out similarities between Robin West’s caring justice and Jacques Derrida’s deconstruction, doing a reasonably good job of explaining Derrida and scolding lots of other people in the process.” The abstract is as follows:

In her 1997 book”Caring for Justice”, Robin West issues a call for a”justice of care”. In the same work, however, West attacks what she calls”postmodernism,”largely because she views it as a threat to her”essentialist”position:the idea that women share essential qualities with each other. However, neither West’s call for the mitigation of general justice with particularized care nor her more general project of enriching the law’s understanding of women’s lives depends on this essentialism. West’s refusal to attend to a wide variety of work lumped together as”postmodernism”undermines the strength of her case for a justice of care in at least two important ways. First, West has blinded herself to remarkably similar and important work done in the area of responsibility, ethics and politics by the late Jacques Derrida. Derrida’s recent explorations of the tensions between the political necessity for general rules of law and ethical responsibility owed to the singular other both enrich the justice/care debate and highlight opportunities for further theoretical development. Attention to this work can only help West in thinking through the issues she has raised. Second, West’s essentialism, premised on the notion that individuals share essential qualities by virtue of their gender, is itself inconsistent with her demand that justice respect each litigant in his or her particularity.

Part II of this Article explores the surprisingly close parallels between Derrida’s and West’s views of justice. Although their notions of justice as asymmetrical relationships based in responsibility are strikingly similar, Derrida and West arrive at their ideas from quite different directions which suggest different practical possibilities and problems. Part III situates Derrida’s writing on justice within the body of his work, in the process attempting to clear away some of the more troublesome misconceptions that have attached themselves to deconstruction in the US. Part IV critiques West’s feminist essentialism and its incompatibility with her idea of caring justice. The article concludes by comparing the implications of Derrida’s and West’s ideas and suggest directions for further research.

Larry Solum featured this terrific sounding piece at the Legal Theory blog today as well, and it should also be noted that KC has her own blog, Doing Justice.

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off on KC Sheehan: “Caring for Deconstruction”

Judge rules that New York Human Rights Law protects transgendered people

Text of ruling here. Press account here. Via Feministing.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on Judge rules that New York Human Rights Law protects transgendered people

Funny and/or Odd Things Elsewhere

Click here and here and here and here and here and here too.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on Funny and/or Odd Things Elsewhere

Boy Toys vs. Girl Toys?

No, I don’t mean it in that sense.  I mean literally: why so many distinctions between toys for boys and toys for girls?   Let’s even make an assumption with which I don’t really agree: that boys and girls have some innate preferences as to toys — boys liking trucks and girls liking dolls, for example.   (Cf. Larry Summers on his girls turning toy trucks into a “family.”)   Can we still agree that we shouldn’t push gender roles on kids unnecessarily?   For a specific example (the one that’s setting me off on this rant): do we really need to designate certain blocks as being for boys and others as being for girls?

boy_girl_blocks.jpg

We were shopping for a one year-old girl’s birthday.   We bought her the “boy” blocks and said a prayer to Larry Summers that we’re not giving her gender identity issues that will scar her for life.

For my daughter’s one-year birthday, a friend bought her a fire truck she can ride that, when you push a button,  plays one of three “firefighter songs”  — a male voice singing about how he’s on his way, etc.   Actually, all three voices are male, which I found troubling because firefighting is such a male-dominated field (in contrast to policing, which has gotten pretty diverse, even though the basic skills needed are pretty similar) that I don’t think it’s a wonderful idea to convey that only men are firefighters.   Ultimately, it’s become her   favorite toy — and she uses it as a truck, not as part of a family, like Larry Summers’s daughter.   So I’m quite proud that Piper Moss aspires to be a firefighter.  (I’m trying to ignore the possibility that I’m interpreting her interest wrong, that her real interest is in being  a “fireman groupie”!)

– Scott Moss

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Guest Blogger | Comments Off on Boy Toys vs. Girl Toys?

Rosa Brooks: “No Escaping Sexualization of Young Girls”

Law Prof and blogger Rosa Ehrenreich Brooks published an op-ed in the LA Times that is accessible here. Below is an excerpt:

It’s been a good week for the media, and a bad week for parents.

The arrest of former schoolteacher John Mark Karr in the slaying of child beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey launched a flurry of excited stories about pedophiles, child abduction and murder. The cable news stations could hardly hide their glee, and even the New York Times joined in.

n a two-part series on pedophilia, the newspaper reported that many pedophiles now use Internet support groups to swap how-to tips on getting jobs as camp counselors and teachers. Increasingly, the Times said, “pedophiles view themselves as the vanguard of a nascent movement seeking legalization of child pornography and the loosening of age-of-consent laws. They portray themselves as battling for children’s rights to engage in sex with adults….”

Great. For anxious parents, it was a week of being paranoid and creeped out : a week to double-check the window locks, run a background check on the preschool music teacher and remind the kids not to enter beauty pageants, talk to strangers, go online or leave the house until their 40th birthday.

True, the statistics suggest that an American child is about as likely to share JonBenet’s fate as she is to be killed by lightning. The abduction and murder of children by people outside their families is exceedingly rare.

But as the mother of preschool girls, I know how easy it is to succumb to irrational panic in the face of this week’s 24/7 media obsession with pedophilia.

Read the rest here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off on Rosa Brooks: “No Escaping Sexualization of Young Girls”

On “Astroturfing” and Paid Shills

Read this post entitled “Their voice. Amplified.” or Why I’m banning 151.200.70.* comments at Newsrack Blog. Via Making Light.
See also this post where the author observed:

…the Internet is populated with strings of comments by the same posse of commenters. …

I’m not sure what to make of this. It sure seems like organized blog commenting to me. But is this kind of coordinated commenting wrong?

The answer has to be no, if the coordination is simply like-minded individuals who get roused by the same posts, all know each other and are compulsive writers. On the other hand, if these are paid industry representatives, they have every moral obligation to state that fact when posting comments so that we all at least know which side their bread is buttered on.

And read this and this and this. Then consider the possibility that this kind of thing could be happening in many different contexts, including, possibly, the “feminist blogosphere.”

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on On “Astroturfing” and Paid Shills

“Who’s making policy? What difference does it make?” An international conference on gender-inclusive decision making for peace with justice

kroc.jpg

October 18-20, 2006 at the Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice in San Diego, CA. From the conference website:

International resolutions and agreements call for women to be at all policymaking tables. This is an international working conference on the shaping of peacemaking, peacekeeping, and peacebuilding policies when women are more engaged. Experts will present signs of influence on policy direction as women and men work jointly on peace and human security issues. Challenges to women’s inclusion in, and within, decision-making bodies in multiple spheres of power will be exposed. Delegates and speakers will explore positive outcomes, as well as inherent roadblocks, in efforts to hold governments, political parties, peacekeepers, armed forces, corporations, religious institutions and civil society accountable for progress in incorporating women as essential partners and voices in peace negotiations, demobilization and disarmament, reconciliation, reconstruction and development, and creation of new constitutions.

Peacebuilding in the twenty-first century is a complex process. It is essential to understand how gender-inclusive decision making in four key sectors can affect and influence peace processes. Distinguished representatives from governments, corporations, peacekeeping and armed forces, and the religious sector who are charged with setting the priorities for conflict prevention, negotiations, or postconflict transitions and healing will update conference delegates. We will look at progress in implementation of the international policy frameworks calling for equal participation of men and women in decision making in their respective sectors.*

In addition panel presentations, a series of knowledge-building, working sessions will give delegates the opportunity to directly engage with and learn from one another and build cross-sector networks and alliances. Delegates will be able to gather and synthesize from the global reports on successes and challenges to gender equality in consultations and decision making on such topics as going to war, peace negotiations, peacekeeping, and postconflict activities including securing more equal roles in political, legislative, reconstruction, and constitutional framing bodies.

Additional information here. This will be the third Women PeaceMakers Conference at the IPJ. Information about the 2004 conference is available here, and information about the 2005 conference can be accessed here.

–Stephanie Farrior

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on “Who’s making policy? What difference does it make?” An international conference on gender-inclusive decision making for peace with justice

CFP: “Passages”

The editors of “Passages: Law Aesthetics Politics” invite submissions for volume 11 of “Law Text Culture.” Details here.

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation | Comments Off on CFP: “Passages”

Robin Morgan Channels the Framers in Her New Book “Fighting Words”

FW.jpg

From Robin Morgan’s website:

In Fighting Words, Robin Morgan has assembled a toolkit for arguing, a verbal karate guide: a lively, accessible, eye-opening collection revealing what the framers (and other leading Americans) really believed:in their own words. She resurrects the Founders as the revolutionaries they were:”A hodgepodge of freethinkers, Deists, agnostics, Christians, atheists, Freemasons:and radicals.”

Two blurby reviews:

“Fighting Words is the indispensible Little Red (and White and Blue) Book for reclaiming our country, a “Quotations from Chairman Jefferson”–plus Washington, Madison, Franklin, and many more. Funny, eye-opening, accessible, smart, and best of all really useful for combating the “Christianizing of America.”:LILY TOMLIN and JANE WAGNER

“Here are the real words of our founders, free of the prison of rightwing distortion–and we’ve never needed them more!”:GLORIA STEINEM

Here is an essay Morgan published in Ms. on the same topic a couple of years ago.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Recommended Books | Comments Off on Robin Morgan Channels the Framers in Her New Book “Fighting Words”

It’s Women’s Equality Day

On August 26, 1920, after 72 years of lobbying and protest, women finally won the right to vote in the United States. NOW is asking people to sign this petition to the prospective 2008 presidential candidates, urging them to make women’s equality a major component of their campaigns. Read more here. Also, say a little thank you to uppity women like Alice Paul.
paul1920-detail_170h.jpg

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on It’s Women’s Equality Day

Prof. Anthony D’Amato argues that porn has decreased rape.

Glenn Reyolds proposed this thesis at Instapundit a while back. Now law prof Tony D’Amato has posted a short law review article, “Porn Up, Rape Down,” with the same thesis; it is downloadable at SSRN here. Below is the abstract:

The incidence of rape in the United States has declined 85% in the past 25 years while access to pornography has become freely available to teenagers and adults. The Nixon and Reagan Commissions tried to show that exposure to pornographic materials produced social violence. The reverse may be true: that pornography has reduced social violence.

D’Amato also published essentially the same article here at Jurist. It isn’t just porn but Internet porn he seems to credit with reducing rape, even though the decline in reported “forcible rape” started in 1992 (which the WaPo article he cites says the FBI stats show as a peak year for rape), at least 4 years before Internet porn was realistically available in a widespread and socially meaningful way.

I am not an expert in the social science research related to the causes of rape, but there are some things his paper doesn’t address that would seem relevelant, such as:

1. The thesis relies in part on the assumptions that a higher proportion of people are consuming increasing levels of porn over time. Is there evidence of this?

2. There is some evidence that watching violent acts increases acts of violence among spectators. I know there are concerns about these studies too, as with most social science research, but assuming for a moment that this is true, why would rape be so diametrically different? Why would watching people hitting each other lead to increased hitting, but watching penetrative sex lead to less pursuit of penetrative sex? Is there any evidence that watching performance of violent acts leads to less violence by observers?

3. Can all porn effect people the same way? Some porn depicts consensual sex, other porn depicts forced sex. If porn does effect behavior, wouldn’t different kinds of porn have different kinds of effects?

4. How exactly does porn lead to fewer rapes? By increasing instances of masturbation? By increasing acts of consensual sex? By altering brain chemistry?

5. What about prosititution? Has it increased along with porn? And if so, wouldn’t that effect rates of reported rape?

6. Other crimes have decreased along with rape (DOJ stats are here) but surely porn did not bring the murder rates down, so aren’t there likely to be other factors at play? One data table D’Amato cites can be accessed here. It does not seem to support in any dramatic way either claims that there was a drastic decrease in rape correlated to the increasing availability of porn beginning in the early 1970s, or the claim that the increasing availability and accessibility of Internet porn substantially reduced rape post 1996. Note how the rape and murder rates seem to rise and fall together.

7. To extend the “porn equals less rape” thesis in a logical but very unappealing way: Would an increase in the availablity of child porn lead to less pedophilia? Any evidence of this? And if not, why would porn decrease some undesirable sexual behaviors but not others? D’Amato theorizes as follows:

Correlations aside, could access to pornography actually cause a decline in rape? In my article I mentioned one possibility: that some people watching pornography may”get it out of their system”and thus have no further desire to go out and actually try it. Another possibility might be labeled the”Victorian effect”: the more that people covered up their bodies with clothes in those days, the greater the mystery of what they looked like in the nude. The sight of a woman’s ankle was considered shocking and erotic. But today, internet porn has thoroughly de-mystified sex. Times have changed so much that some high school teachers of sex education are beginning to show triple-X porn movies to their students in order to depict techniques of satisfactory intercourse.

He seems to assume that watching sex and “de-mystifying” the “techniques of satisfactory intercourse” decreases a person’s urges or propensities to rape, as if sex and rape are the same thing, a rather questionable claim, shall we say.

–Ann Bartow

Update: (Query from an e-mail) Anyone think Reynolds or D’Amato could argue with a straight face that the sexual assaults at The Citadel noted in the post below were due to a lack of porn?

Update 2d: See related posts at Abyss2Hope and Alas, a Blog.

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law | Comments Off on Prof. Anthony D’Amato argues that porn has decreased rape.

Sexual Assault at The Citadel

There was an article in my local paper about this, and I’ve been looking for it in the online version, but for some reason they appear not to have posted it. The Charleston Post and Courier has the story up though, accessible here. Below are some excerpts:

Nearly one woman in five attending The Citadel last spring reported being sexually assaulted since enrolling at the school, according to a survey launched by the new president to gauge the campus climate on gender relations.

Reports of sexual assault and harassment were higher among both female and male Citadel cadets than among cadets and midshipmen at the Air Force Academy, the Naval Academy and West Point who took a similar survey in 2004.

Nineteen Citadel men – about one in 25 of the men surveyed – also reported being sexually assaulted since joining the Corps of Cadets.

For both women and men, most alleged sexual assaults involved unwanted touching and stroking, fondling private parts and kissing. But 16 of the 27 incidents reported by women and 15 of the 23 reported by men involved unwanted sexual intercourse, oral sex, anal sex or sexual penetration with an object.

Most incidents weren’t reported to school officials or law enforcement.

Most of those involving women happened in the barracks or elsewhere on campus and the perpetrator was another cadet.

About a third of the incidents involving men happened on campus and about half of the perpetrators were Citadel cadets.

The survey did not ask cadets to identify the gender of the perpetrators.

I have to wonder why the survey didn’t ask about the gender of the perpetrators, but I certainly have a few theories. The article winds up being a bit of a valentine to John Rosa, the Citadel’s new President, noting:

Earlier this month, Rosa unveiled to the school’s Board of Visitors the Values and Respect Program. It is a series of lessons on sexual harassment and assault, alcohol and drug abuse and the school’s honor code. All cadets are required to participate in the program which will begin this month.

Rosa said it’s meant to change the climate at The Citadel, making it a place where cadets respect themselves and each other.

During the fall semester, freshmen will attend 14 hours of lessons and upperclassmen will attend seven hours of classes.

Students previously learned about sexual assault and harassment, drug abuse and the honor code, he said. But the new program integrates the information in all parts of cadets’ on-campus lives.

Before the start of classes today, Rosa met with all cadets and explained the program to them. He also notified faculty and staff members, parents and alumni.

The Citadel began admitting women after the ruling in United States v. Virginia. The Citadel is a public college funded and operated by South Carolina. It is not affiliated with any branch of the U.S. Military. Students pay tuition to attend The Citadel, and they are not required or expected to serve in any branch of the military after they graduate. According to this site only about 40 percent of graduates “earn military commissions.” Women were not admitted until ten years ago because they weren’t wanted, not because of any “military” issue.

The Citadel graduated its first male African American cadet, Charles Foster, in 1970. The second African American to graduate was a friend of mine, the late and very much missed Joe Shine. He had a hard time as a cadet, and he put a lot of time and energy into making sure the students who followed him received better treatment. The first female African American cadets to graduate received their degrees in 2002.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Sexual Assault at The Citadel

New Paper on Confidential Settlements (mine)

I’ve recently posted on SSRN an article that’s sort of half employment discrimination, half civil procedure, and half economic analysis: Illuminating Secrecy: A New Economic Analysis of Confidential Settlements, 105 Mich. L. Rev. __ (2007).   The reason I think of it as (at least partly) an employment discrimination piece is that when I was in employment law practice, I was disturbed that virtually all settlements in such cases are confidential, which means that the incidence of discrimination is badly hidden from public view.

However, my paper isn’t a “confidentiality is bad” piece –though I agree with such pieces, like Minna Kotkin’s excellent (and excellently titled!) Invisible Settlements, Invisible Discrimination).   Rather, my paper analyzes what the effects of banning confidentiality would be on parties’ incentives to settle — and it concludes that many analysts are wrong to assume that banning confidentiality would inhibit settlement and otherwise would be economically inefficient.   Here’s the abstract:

Even the most hotly contested lawsuits typically end in a confidential settlement forbidding the parties from disclosing their allegations, evidence, or settlement amount. Confidentiality draws fierce criticism for harming third parties by concealing serious misdeeds like discrimination, pollution, defective manufacturing, and sexual abuse. Others defend confidentiality as a mutually beneficial pay-for-silence bargain that facilitates settlement, serves judicial economy, and prevents frivolous copycat lawsuits. This debate is based in economic logic, yet most analyses have been surprisingly shallow as to how confidentiality affects incentives to settle. Depicting a more nuanced, complex reality of litigation and settlement, this Article reaches several conclusions quite different from the economic conventional wisdom – and absent from the existing literature.

First, contrary to the conventional wisdom that banning confidentiality would inhibit settlement, a ban may promote early settlements. No ban could effectively cover settlements reached before litigation, so any ban would incentivize parties to settle confidentially pre-filing – and such early settlements save more litigation costs. Second, a ban would affect high- and low-value cases differently, depending on whether publicity-conscious defendants worry more about one big settlement or several small ones. Third, more settlement data could help parties settle and also, by decreasing litigation uncertainty, deter frivolous litigation. Fourth, more settlement data could reveal which companies engage in unlawful practices, yielding more efficient decisions by consumers, workers, and investors who otherwise engage in over-avoidance when unable to distinguish hazardous from safe goods.

In sum, a confidentiality ban would decrease settlements of cases already in litigation but it would have many countervailing positive effects: increasing pre-filing settlements; deterring frivolous lawsuits, and improving product and job market decisions. We cannot predict the net effect of all these competing effects, however, contrary to the traditional economic story. Economics thus does not counsel against a confidentiality ban; jurisdictions adopting a ban would be undertaking a worthy experiment with a promising but uncertain policy.

This analysis typifies the schism between traditional economic analyses, which reach definite conclusions by simplifying complex realities, and many contemporary economic analyses, which are realistically nuanced but do not yield categorical conclusions. Ultimately, the latter brand of economics is sounder and still can clarify important matters such as parties’ incentives, rules’ costs and benefits, and the tradeoffs and competing effects of a policy like a confidentiality ban.

– Scott Moss

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Feminists in Academia, Guest Blogger | Comments Off on New Paper on Confidential Settlements (mine)

“Token Pride”

Very engaging post about race by “Vicky Vengeance” at Mean Feminisim. Below is an excerpt:

Getting down to business, I am back from Hawaii and I sure am tan, but I’m always “tan” I guess considering that I am “of color.” For those of you who don’t know, I’m a mixed race person with a blonde, blue-eyed, WASPy as all get out mother and a Japanese American father. To further explain, I am a fourth generation American, meaning that my grandparents were born in America and did not speak Japanese. They did end up in internment camps during World War II when they were supposedly a gigantic threat to national security, what with being 9 years old and all though. Admittedly, children may be the single most frightening thing to me on the entire planet, but I think that might be more of a personal problem.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Links | Comments Off on “Token Pride”

Feminism, Essentialism and Blogging

Heart from Women’s Space/The Margins posted some thoughts about differences and feminism at Genderberg well worth excerpting here:

Does anybody see the way blogs and blogrolls seem to break down along color lines? Lesbian/het lines? Western/Third World-Global South lines? It’s a problem.

We just can’t afford this in this new resurgence of radical feminism (for which I am honestly so grateful). We can’t afford to make that mistake this time around. The world is much smaller today than it was in 1970, for one thing. And as Germaine Greer said in a quote I have on my boards, in so many words, we ain’t seen nuttin yet. White Western feminists have had the privilege of serving the longest revolution, not of leading it. When female power really breaks forth, it will break forth in Thailand, in China, in the Middle East, where women have nothing to lose because they’ve lost it all already. If we want to be part of this — I do, and hope I live long enough to see it, though Greer says I won’t — we have to walk alongside all of our sisters, I think, working to understand all the ways they experience subordination on the basis of sex which don’t look quite like the ways we, as (mostly) white feminists, experience it.

What Germaine Greer was talking about in the quote I referenced was her belief that the day will come, in the future, when women in China, the Middle East, Thailand, Africa, will simply, in huge numbers, be fed up. The revolution that happens then will be unlike any we have so far experienced, in numbers, in magnitude. We already see this happening in Africa where women are staging protests against oil companies and getting arrested for it, and where they are creating and defending woman-only villages like Umoja Village. I am with Greer on this. I don’t think any nation, including the U.S., will be able to stop this female power when it breaks forth. It won’t be coming out of government bodies, it won’t have anything to do with nations or national policies, the U.S. won’t be setting any pace for anything; this will be about again women and girls, being fed up and hitting the streets, just to begin with.

… I think it is wrong-headed for white U.S. radical feminists to in any way minimize the significance of the different experiences of women of color and white women. I don’t think it’s up to us as white women to tell women of color that they should focus on prostitution and pornography, if at the same time we are unwilling to consider issues which *are* radical feminist issues to them, even though they might not be to us. That’s where we have to listen, pay attention. A huge example of white radfem blindness in this area is all the brouhaha over Cecilia Fire Thunder’s plan to create a women’s clinic on the Oglala Sioux reservation. In other words, when women of color do something which we figure might directly benefit US– like building a women’s clinic in a state that has outlawed abortion (SD), we are right there with our support. We’re down with that. But where the hell were we 10 or 15 or 20 years or 30 years ago when Native Women were fighting for Native American sovereignty rights which would have enabled them provide the health care to Native Women which as white women we have taken for granted all along? We weren’t anywhere. We couldn’t be bothered. But now they are supposed to view us as their allies, because we want in on something they are doing? It doesn’t work that way. Native American women’s reproductive rights are both a radical feminist issue and an issue of Native women’s tribal sovereignty rights. We, as white American women, aren’t directly affected by the way Native women are treated, but these are *women* and we say that we are woman-centered. If we are, then we have to CARE about Native Women’s tribal sovereignty issues because they affect Native women. Again, this is one of SO many similar issues and our behavior around this kind of issue is what alienates feminists of color, keeps them from radical feminism, and results in the way blogrolls and blogs break down along racial and ethnic lines.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminist Blogs Of Interest, Sisters In Other Nations | Comments Off on Feminism, Essentialism and Blogging

Feminist Science Fiction and Fantasy Carnival: 4th Edition

Here, at Alas, a Blog.

Share
Posted in Carnival time! | Comments Off on Feminist Science Fiction and Fantasy Carnival: 4th Edition

“A Girl Like Me”

At Digital Femme, Cheryl Lynn writes about Barbies, race and hair in a very compelling way. Via Pen-Elayne.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “A Girl Like Me”

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

pearlsblogthrottle.gif

From here (click here for clearer rendering), via Everyday Life.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on

“The Female Brain”

femalebarin.jpg

The 8/20 WaPo ran a review by Deborah Tannen of “The Female Brain” by Louann Brizendine called “A Brain of One’s Own.” In it she writes:

… In a breezy, playful style (the calming hormone oxytocin is a “fluffy, purring kitty,” while testosterone “has no time for cuddling”), Brizendine follows the development of women’s brains from birth through the teen years, to courting, pregnancy, childbirth and child-rearing, and on to menopause and beyond. Throughout the book, I recognized biological accounts for social behaviors I had observed and written about. For example, the major role played by talk in women’s and girls’ close relationships is explained by differences in the brain. For one thing, “some verbal areas of the brain are larger in women than in men.” How did they get that way? “The testosterone surge” that male fetuses experience in utero “shrinks the centers for communication.” In addition, “It is during the teen years that the flood of estrogen in girls’ brains will activate oxytocin and sex-specific female brain circuits, especially those for talking, flirting, and socializing.”

Anthropologists and linguists who have studied children at play have noted that girls form bonds by telling secrets. Here, too, Brizendine finds “a biological reason”: “Connecting through talking activates the pleasure centers in a girl’s brain. Sharing secrets that have romantic and sexual implications activates those centers even more. … It’s a major dopamine and oxytocin rush.” Many readers will find it intriguing or reassuring that their own experiences are supported by brain studies, though such studies may raise the question of what’s cause and what’s effect. Do girls and women enjoy talking because it creates this hormonal rush, or do they get the hormonal rush because they enjoy talking about personal matters? Either way, brain studies dovetail with anthropological observations. …

Tannen concludes:

… The descriptions of how hormonal surges and plunges might result in women’s erratic behavior and emotional unpredictability can seem like a dangerous reinforcement of stereotypes. But Brizendine argues that not understanding the effects of hormonal cycles is itself dangerous because women end up blaming themselves. She notes, crucially, that 80 percent of women are only mildly affected by hormone fluctuations, and that “a hormone alone does not cause a behavior. Hormones merely raise the likelihood that under certain circumstances a behavior will occur.” Perhaps these caveats should be repeated as running heads on every page.

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould once said he despaired of the constant question “Is it nature or nurture?” because “biology and environment are inextricably linked.” Ideally, readers will sift through the case studies, research findings and scientific conjectures gathered in this non-technical book and be intrigued by some while questioning others, bearing in mind the caution that hormones and brain structure play a role in gender differences but are not the whole story. And if this book joins a “nature” chorus that has swelled as a corrective to the previous pendulum swing toward “nurture,” we can assume that another corrective will follow. But given the character — and rancor — of our dichotomous approach to the influences of biology and culture, readers likely will be fascinated or angered, convinced or skeptical, according to the positions they have staked out already. That would be a pity.

A more unequivocally favorable review of the book, from sfgate.com, is accessible here. A rather negative review is available here at Boston.com.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Recommended Books | 4 Comments

Plan B, a.k.a. The Morning After Pill, Cleared by the FDA For OTC Sales To Those Over 18 Years Old

NYT story here. See also this post and embedded links.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Plan B, a.k.a. The Morning After Pill, Cleared by the FDA For OTC Sales To Those Over 18 Years Old

Sexism For Clicks And Profit

Michael Noer, Forbes.com’s executive editor for news, wrote an opinion column for Forbes.com that started out like this:

Guys: A word of advice. Marry pretty women or ugly ones. Short ones or tall ones. Blondes or brunettes. Just, whatever you do, don’t marry a woman with a career.

Why? Because if many social scientists are to be believed, you run a higher risk of having a rocky marriage. While everyone knows that marriage can be stressful, recent studies have found professional women are more likely to get divorced, more likely to cheat, less likely to have children, and, if they do have kids, they are more likely to be unhappy about it. A recent study in Social Forces, a research journal, found that women–even those with a “feminist” outlook–are happier when their husband is the primary breadwinner.

His thesis is that “economic theory” and “a host of studies” demonstrate that men who want happy marriages should not marry “career girls,” who he helpfully defines as follows: “a “career girl” has a university-level (or higher) education, works more than 35 hours a week outside the home and makes more than $30,000 a year.”

Blogospheric response to this column was apparently somewhat different than whatever it was that the Forbes folks were initially anticipating, or maybe they expected a strong negative reaction all along, it’s hard to tell the exact depth of the phoniness and subterfuge here. First Forbes rather ostentatiously pulled the column down, and then the company reposted it, repackaged as part of a “Point/Counterpoint debate,” so that it appeared more balanced and journalistic. It is accessible here, but please use the Gawker link at the bottom of this post instead for reasons that will become obvious if they aren’t already.

Not content to let Forbes get all the links, page loads, attention and advertising revenue from this contretemps, Jack Shafer at Slate.com wrote a bizarre column explaining that no one has “convinced” him that “the article…really insults women.” He closes his piece as follows:

What upsets you about the piece? Bore me with your fury at slate.pressbox@gmail.com. (E-mail may be quoted by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)

Obviously he is trying to free ride upon profitable sexism while positioning himself as relatively clean of hand and persuadable on the issues Noer raises, but Shafer is not nearly as subtle or clever as perhaps he thinks he is. I’ve linked to both the Forbes and Slate articles above so that interested readers can see what it is I am referencing and describing here in full text. Documenting the existence and location of the article is necessary, but I hate the fact that this gives both of these incredibly stupid and manipulative articles “linkage” that provides them with visibilty, higher linking rankings and enhanced page load numbers, because that is exactly what they seem to be gunning for. Maybe this post demontrates that I can easily be provoked into taking the bait on something like this, but at least I can simultaneously point out the orchestrated and instrumental nature of what Forbes and Slate have done here, reaping the harvest of sexism. On the bright side, it shows that both periodicals understand that there are a lot of online feminists who are motivated to challenge Noer’s normative claims. It’s frustrating, though, that the technology of the Internet seems to require playing into his and Shafer’s hands in order to critique and rebut them.

You can read more at Polimom, and Be A Human Being, and Indian Writing, and Pandagon, and other fine feminist blogs. I leave you with observations from Grendel at On The Turning Away:

It’s hard to escape the suspicion that the evocative and provocative Noer piece on Forbes.com that has generated an uproar in the blogosphere is not a (desperate) PR stunt to draw traffic to the Forbes.com site amid the summer malaise.

On Technorati, Forbes jumped to the No. 4 slot from nowhere when we last checked. A search for”Noer, Forbes”generated 150 blogs (ours included) as of this hour.

Evidence: as of last night, the original Noer piece that was pulled earlier in the evening was back, alongside with a counter or Petain-esque, depending on where you come from, piece by Elizabeth Corcoran,”Don’t Marry A Lazy Man.”

Gawker has launched a boycott of Forbes.com by providing links (embedded in this post) to both articles. As one Gawker reader commented, Forbes is for”men who are too dumb to read the Economist.”

To a cynical mind, this might be the first salvo by the octogenarian Forbes (mag) in the wake of a recent sellout to Bono’s PE shop, Elevation, by the Forbes family. As the cliché goes, desperate times call for desperate measures. One might add that desperation can sometimes backfire.

–Ann Bartow

Update: According to this Salon article, Gloria Steinem reacted to the Forbes piece as follows:

“I’m deeply grateful to Forbes Magazine for saving many women the trouble of dealing with men who can’t tolerate equal partnerships, take care of their own health, clean up after themselves or have the sexual confidence to survive, other than a double standard of sexual behavior. Since a disproportionate number of such unconfident and boring guys apparently read Forbes, the magazine has performed a real service.”

You can also read about Linda Hirshman’s reaction at Salon, in which she refers to non-career women as “dummies” and “bimbos.” Ugh.

Update: Christine Hurt had a few observations about the article here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Sexism in the Media | Comments Off on Sexism For Clicks And Profit

A Cocktail For Carnivores

    The Weenie-Tini

weeniecello.jpg

3 oz weeniecello (hot dog infused vodka)
1 oz dry vermouth
splash of sauerkraut brine
Garnish with a slice of frankfurter.

Full recipe here.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on A Cocktail For Carnivores

Good Links

“Hang Up and Drive” at Creek Running North.

“‘Progressive’ company tries to bully and censor magazine. Shocking.” at Pinko Feminist Hellcat.

“Shame and Sex” at Mad, Melancholic Femnista.

“Cerebrogenesis” at Reappropriate.

“Resisting Self-Defense” at Finnegan’s Wake-Up Call.

“Feminism Needs A New Name” at Men Are From Earth, Women Are From Earth.

“Street Harassment Project” at SecondWaver.

“Jamie’s Trip To Syracuse,” part one and part two (especially part two) at Le Blog Berube.

Share
Posted in Links | Comments Off on Good Links

Let Me Know of Your Scholarship

I’ve meant to say this for a while: some of my posts are of the “hey, here’s an interesting new piece of gender-related scholarship” variety, so I would love to hear (and post) about new (or recent) works by by any of you who are writing in the field.   Email me at scott.moss at marquette.edu.   Thanks!

– Scott Moss

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Feminists in Academia, Guest Blogger | Comments Off on Let Me Know of Your Scholarship

Susan Sturm, “Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education”

Susan Sturm’s writings are some of the most interesting analyses of discrimination around; a favorite of mine is her 2001 article, Second Generation Employment Discrimination.   Her newest piece just got posted on SSRN: The Architecture of Inclusion: Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education, Harvard Journal of Law & Gender (formerly Harvard Women’s Law Journal) 2006.    I have a particular interest in this subject matter because it coincides with some of my own recent articles on why occupational gender segregation is lasting so long in various fields (including certain sectors of academia) and why courts are granting too much deference to academic employers in discrimination cases.   But I’m betting that this Sturm article will be of especially wide interest because (1) it’s our field (academia) she’s discussing, and (2) it marries the theoretical and the practical (e.g., discussing tangible steps universities can undertake to improve matters) in a way that expands the article’s relevant audience (e.g., deans and university diversity committees could benefit from it).   Here’s the abstract:

This Article develops a paradigm for advancing workplace equality when the problems causing racial and gender under-participation are structural, and the legal environment surrounding diversity initiatives is uncertain. It first analyzes three key dilemmas that have limited the efficacy of prior diversity initiatives: limited capacity to institutionalize change, a legal minefield, and ineffective public accountability. It then offers three related ideas in service of advancing workplace equity through institutional transformation. Although its focus is on higher education, the Article develops an approach with more general applicability. First, it develops the norm of institutional citizenship as a justification and goal for diversity initiatives: creating the conditions enabling people of all races and genders to realize their potential and participate fully in institutional life. The goal of full institutional citizenship entails identifying and removing institutional barriers that arbitrarily thwart the participation of women, people of color, and other excluded groups. In addition, universities are themselves institutional citizens of a broader polity, occupying a crucial location where public citizenship is expressed and playing a central role in advancing important social values and achieving institutional legitimacy.

Second, the Article identifies a pivotal institutional role, called an “organizational catalysts,” as a mechanism of change toward institutional citizenship. Organizational catalysts operate at the convergence of different domains and levels of activity. Their role involves connecting and leveraging knowledge, ongoing strategic relationships and collaborations, and forms of accountability across systems. Organizational catalysts act as information entrepreneurs and bridge builders: people with knowledge, influence, and credibility in positions to influence practice at pivotal locations where gender and racial biases operate. The need for organizational catalysts stems from the institutional underpinnings of persistent bias. Disparities are the result of cumulative disadvantage in everyday interactions operating across the spectrum of institutional life. Full participation in the workplace requires a process of institutional attentiveness across the spectrum of decisions that ultimately determine whether women and men of all races will have the opportunity to thrive, succeed, and advance. This institutional attentiveness can be developed by building the organizational catalyst role into the architecture of a change initiative.

Finally, the Article illustrates the role of institutional intermediaries in sustaining and providing accountability for this institutional change process. Institutional intermediaries are public or quasi-public organizations that leverage their position within preexisting communities of practice to foster change and provide meaningful accountability. Instead of relying on the direct threat of judicial sanctions, institutional intermediaries use their ongoing capacity-building role within a particular occupational sector to build knowledge (through establishing common metrics, information pooling, and networking), introduce incentives (such as competition, institutional improvement, and potential impact on funding), and provide accountability (including grass roots participation and self-, peer- and external evaluation).

The Article’s springboard for developing this new paradigm is a case study of an innovative public initiative designed to increase the participation of women in academic science. The case study features the interrelationships of three key stakeholders. The National Science Foundation is the central public intermediary in this case study. Through a program called ADVANCE, it uses its granting power to foster the development of linked communities of practice among universities that are experimenting with ways to advance women in academic science through institutional transformation. The University of Michigan provides the context for analyzing the mechanisms fostering institutional inclusiveness. Through its ADVANCE grant, UM has developed a series of initiatives that remove barriers to participation at key decision points (both individual and institutional) in order to increase women’s inclusion and advancement as faculty. Finally, lawyers and other compliance actors are facilitating the implementation of programs that operate within the parameters set forth in Grutter and Gratz by redefining their role as more “constitutional”: helping universities establish processes and governance systems that are accountable and principled in the way they pursue inclusiveness. These roles for law and lawyers avoid some of the pitfalls constraining law’s effectiveness under more traditional anti-discrimination and affirmative action approaches.

– Scott Moss

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Feminists in Academia, Guest Blogger | Comments Off on Susan Sturm, “Advancing Workplace Equity in Higher Education”

According to the LA Times, she’s hot, likes drugs, and cares about fashion – what else can you ask for in a lawyer?

The full title of the news article? A Law Unto Herself: The criminal defense attorney is star-struck, young and unorthodox. But don’t be fooled. She’s also Ivy League, savvy and successful.”

Here’s an excerpt:

Her husband said she used to believe whatever her clients told her, accepting preposterous explanations for crimes. There was the woman who didn’t mean to stab her boyfriend. She just threw a basket that happened to contain a knife.

And there was the time Margolin burst into tears after a prosecutor told her she had only minutes to decide whether to take a deal that would put a client in prison for 17 years. The prosecutor relented and extended the deadline.

A lawyer for 3 1/2 years, Margolin has gained notoriety for unorthodox ads that proclaim her “L.A.’s dopest attorney.” She even has a video publicizing her practice on the Internet site http://www.youtube.com.

Here is another:

At Columbia she pulled seven-hour study stretches on Saturdays and Sundays, was an editor on the college newspaper and taught a political science class.

That helped when she applied to Harvard Law School, although her application essay was risky. She argued that drugs should be legalized, a position her father warned would doom her chance of admission.

She was admitted anyway.

Once there, “I was like the most eccentric person,” she said. She remembered feeling like a neon sign in a bright yellow vest and tinted glasses in the classrooms.

“I studied a lot, and I didn’t lie about it, and people would make fun of me for it,” she said. “People at Harvard pretended they didn’t have to work because they were geniuses. ”

She pursed her lips sideways and fiddled with a strand of hair. “They called me the Dirty Librarian because I swore and wore glasses.”

She said she was not intimidated by some of the bullying law professors because her mother’s boyfriends over the years had made her used to nasty lawyers.

The title of her law school thesis was “The Right to Get High.”

She passed the bar on the first try: “It was like a miracle,” she said.

And one more:

“Your daughter is a beauty,” a lawyer in the courtroom whispered to her father.

“Thank you,” the elder Margolin replied.

“And a damn good lawyer.”

“Thank you.”

Outside, Allison Margolin was jubilant. “This was like amazing. They don’t usually say no objection” to returning the plants.

Then she noticed her father’s Cole Haan shoes, which she had bought him. “Dad, you’re wearing your Father’s Day shoes!”

While one can readily admire Margolin’s rugged individualism and determination to succeed on her own terms, it’s also hard not to notice that the article rather pointedly makes her sound like a doof.

Via Orin Kerr.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Legal Profession, Sexism in the Media, Uncategorized | Comments Off on According to the LA Times, she’s hot, likes drugs, and cares about fashion – what else can you ask for in a lawyer?

Katrina Events in and Around New Orleans

The G Bitch Spot has a long list, and links as well.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Katrina Events in and Around New Orleans

So Awful It’s Funny, Maybe.

Okay, first of all, both the product itself and the packaging are completely repulsive:
nads2.jpg

Naughty Nad’s Bikini Design Kit with 4 Naughty Bikini Shapes
Remove Hair…..down there!
Surprise that someone special or simply indulge your wickedness by personalising your most intimate region. Bikini designs are Landing Strips, Bermuda Triangle, Heart and Thunderstruck. Full instructions and kit inside to yield professional results.

With soothing calendula and sensual mango & peach scent.

Kit contains: 140g Nad’s Bikini wax, 4 Bikini Shapes (x2), 2 Spatulas, 2 Orange Sticks, 4 Nad’s Soothing and Finnishing Wipes, Instructions Booklet.

Apparently you have to supply your own epidural. Why (beyond the obvious masochism inherent in product use) this represents “wickedness” thoroughly escapes me. Now take a deep breath and behold the Naughty Nads magazine advert:

nads.JPG

Arrrrrgh. Via Feministing, where Ann noted: “And as if the ‘pussy’ ad wasn’t disturbing enough, the company initially asked women to send in ‘real-life images of pubic hair grooming.'”

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | 1 Comment

Racist Female Dolls

I don’t mean the dolls themselves are racist (i.e., it’s not “Kenny Klansman”); I mean that the marketing of the doll is racist.

doll.JPG

This is an African-American female doll whose package reads, on the lower right corner, “I Love to Dance!” The white female dolls had different labels, like “Charming Smiles!” and some other such harmless one. This seems even a tad worse than Mattel’s creepy announcement that it “celebrates the working woman”with”French Maid Barbie”.   Actually, the best analogy probably is to earlier Barbies: following the “Dr. Barbie” and “Astronaut Barbie” progress of the 1980s, the 1990s brought us the talking Barbie who complained, “Math is Hard!” (Just as sadly, I think she also said something about loving to shop.)

My wife asked a good question: “I wonder what talents the Asian or Latino dolls have”?   (A doll of me clearly would say, “I Love to Write Smart-Aleck Things and Get Hate Email!”)

– Scott Moss

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Guest Blogger | Comments Off on Racist Female Dolls

“Home Is Where The Work Is”

A report about New York’s domestic work industry prepared by Datacenter and Domestic Workers United (see also this site) can be downloaded here. Among the report’s findings:

90% of workers lack health care benefits.
33% of workers subjected to abuse
67% of workers never receive overtime pay even though …
43% work more than 50 hours per week AND
35% work more than 60 hours per week.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on “Home Is Where The Work Is”

“I Statements”

This is one of the New Mexico State Abstinence Education Program’s “teen generated campaigns.” I have to think that the teen in pink is thinking, “Darn, why couldn’t I have been the one who has a future? Or who has a little sister who looks up to her?”

abs1.jpg
abs2.jpg
abs3.jpg
abs4.jpg

Via Feministing.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “I Statements”