Naomi Cahn and June Carbone, “Lifting the Floor: Sex, Class, and Education”

Yet another terrific article from two of my favorite Feminist Law Profs! Here is the abstract:

This paper was written for a conference on third wave feminism. Third wave feminism recognizes the importance of “raising the floor,” and this paper – from two second wave feminists – helps in developing an agenda for achieving that goal. After a brief exploration of two different models that we label “red families” and “blue families,” this paper makes two critical points: first, it correlates the different models to the varying approaches to parental leave laws; and second, it expands our discussion of women and care beyond the workplace and child care, exploring what contributes to women’s ability to care for their children (and others) – education – an outcome that is associated with deferred childbearing and higher income and the newer family model. Our conversation about third wave feminism must examine women’s means of moving between classes and being able to provide better care to themselves and to others (whether it be children or parents or significant others).

Download it here!

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off on Naomi Cahn and June Carbone, “Lifting the Floor: Sex, Class, and Education”

There is no anonymity in cyberspace, part whatever.

The authorities figured out who hacked Sarah Palin’s e-mail account quite easily. When law enforcement refuse to help women victimized by internet harassers and stalkers, it is because they don’t want to, not because they can’t.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminism and Technology | Comments Off on There is no anonymity in cyberspace, part whatever.

“New Questions on Women, Academe and Careers”

Scott Jaschik at Inside Higher Ed wrote an article with this title, in which he notes:

In field after field, women either outperform or equal men : only to lag in key positions in academe (or in other careers that attract the highly educated). Identifying the causes for these gender gaps has become increasingly urgent as colleges find their enrollments increasingly female and some formerly male dominated fields struggle to attract enough talent.

Seeking to advance the discussion about why these trends persist and what can be done about them, some of the leading scholars of gender, education and careers gathered Friday to present new and evolving research projects. Most of the research came from economists and the host for the symposium was Columbia University Business School : perhaps explaining a practical, statistically based approach.

Key questions explored included the varying factors that help professional women achieve or miss their goals, why some professions are relatively more successful than others at both attracting and retaining women, and the relative significance of qualities of women and of institutions that may explain these gaps.

Read his overview of the research that was presented here, which included this table:

Percentage of ‘Harvard and Beyond’ Women Employed Full Time 15 Years After Graduation

Advanced Degree Earned No Children 1 Child 2 or More Children
M.B.A. 84.4% 70.9% 40.0%
J.D. 82.5% 64.1% 48.5%
M.D., D.D.S., D.V.M 92.7% 80.5% 60.4%
Ph.D. 91.5% 64.9% 57.5%

Via Historiann, who trenchantly notes:

I have two main questions:   first of all, what’s with the hostile sub-literates commenting there?   Posts about gender equity always bring out the trolls at IHE, but some of those comments were especially stupid and pointless.   But on to my main question, which is:   Why are women academics so willing to chuck it all in after having even only one child (let alone more children) when they work in such a”family friendly”occupation?

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminists in Academia, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on “New Questions on Women, Academe and Careers”

2008 World Stem Cell Summit in Madison, Wisconsin

This week stem cell scientists from across the globe are meeting at the University of Wisconsin at Madison to discuss a multitude of issues they face including the scientific, business, legal, ethical and regulatory issues these doctors, clinicians and researchers face in their work.

Last night we took my dad out to dinner at a great deli in San Diego, D.Z. Akins. (Try it next January/AALS; you will love it). My dad’s hands and mouth shake so badly now that he could hardly enjoy his meal. He is embarrassed by his inabilities so he just stops eating. He says he is not that hungry and his pants get looser and looser. My father has Parkinson’s Disease and it has rendered him so disabled that he can no longer live at home. Last month we had to move him into a residential care facility and it was one of the most difficult things my sisters and I have had to do. Every time I visit him he wants to know when he can move back home.

Scientists at the World Stem Cell summit have stated that the future of stem cell research in Madison and throughout the nation depends upon the 2008 presidential election. The conference has a number of disease specific panels including spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, cancer, diabetes, Parkinson’s, ALS, neurological disorders, cardiovascular disease, blindness and diseases of the eye where they will discuss the science, foundation, industry and advocacy perspectives.

While packing my father’s bags last month was challenging, the most difficult thing I have had to do is watch my mother die of terminal cancer. She fought her cancer every day for thirty-six months with courage, grace, and dignity and more strength than a herd of elephants. At the end when there was very little hope for her, she even elected to enter a clinical trial. Because of her clinical trial participation, I have learned much about the amazing recent advances in cancer research. I have met two year plus cancer survivors who were given only months to live. I have met the vibrant young son of a cancer survivor who survived the same deadly Stage IV cancer my mother did not. I have witnessed the enthusiasm and commitment of the research doctors and clinicians who are fighting daily battles against cancer trying to win the war. A war they believe with support and resources they can win.

A number of top researchers at the 2008 World Stem Cell Summit have made the following statement: “Supporting all forms of stem cell research is in the best, long-term interests of a broad spectrum of patients with complex and debilitating diseases and injuries.”

Obviously, there are scientists, doctors and researchers who will disagree with this statement. I support their right to disagree and I encourage them strongly to use any methods available to battle these terrible diseases. I am certain there are individuals who do not believe in embryonic or any other types of stem cell research. I support their right to have this position. And I know that embryonic or other types of stem cell research do not hold the cures for all diseases and may not cure any disease.

However, support for stem cell research, including embryonic stem cells, is an issue very near and dear to me and my family and too many of my chosen sisters who are suffering and fighting the war against cardiovascular disease (responsible for 40% of female deaths; 1 out of every 2.6 female deaths), breast cancer (1 in 8 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 1 in 30 will die from breast cancer), lung cancer (85% of nonsmokers with lung cancer are women and it is the most deadly cancer for women and men) and colon cancer (third most common cause of cancer deaths in women even though if diagnosed early through a colonoscopy it has a 95% survival rate). (Source.)

I want to have a clear understanding of the positions of the presidential and vice presidential candidates on stem cell research, including their positions on embryonic stem cell research. I am not interested in artful manipulation of words to minimize the clarity and distort the message they are attempting not to deliver. With 40 plus days left until the election, time is of the essence to state their positions on this and other critical issues not to misinterpret and misstate their opponent’s positions. We deserve no less. And in loving memory of my mother, I demand it.

–Francine Lipman

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics, Feminism and Technology, Women's Health | Comments Off on 2008 World Stem Cell Summit in Madison, Wisconsin

Naomi Cahn, “Accidental Incest: Drawing the Line – Or the Curtain? – For Reproductive Technology”

The abstract:

This article calls for setting limits on the number of offspring born from any one individual’s gametes, and for continuing to sanction incest, even when it comes to adult, inter-sibling consensual behaviour. The article examines the issues of inadvertent consanguinity raised by third-party gamete use through a feminist lens on both incest and reproductive technology. The central questions concern regulation of reproductive technology, such as whether legal restrictions on the fertility market might diminish the possibilities of accidental incest, as well as whether criminal and civil sanctions of intrafamilial sexual behavior should apply to relationships created through reproductive technology; these, in turn, require examinations of the fertility business itself as well as broader justifications for incest prohibitions.

Downloadable here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Naomi Cahn, “Accidental Incest: Drawing the Line – Or the Curtain? – For Reproductive Technology”

“A lawyer was suspended for more than a year for accepting nude dances from a stripper as partial payment for the legal fees she owed him.”

Yeesh… The linked article also notes: “While she agreed to the performances, the client contended he touched her inappropriately during those dances, and she went to police in 2002 with sexual assault allegations.” I can guess why he was never charged criminally, unfortunately.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Coerced Sex, Legal Profession | Comments Off on “A lawyer was suspended for more than a year for accepting nude dances from a stripper as partial payment for the legal fees she owed him.”

Statetris South Carolina

Statetris is an interesting game mixing aspects of the popular game ‘Tetris’ and geography. Instead of positioning the typical Tetris blocks, you position states/countries at their proper location. Play here.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer, South Carolina | Comments Off on Statetris South Carolina

Video of Maya Angelou Introducing Michelle Obama In Greensboro, NC

Here. She notes that she supported Hillary Rodham Clinton in the primaries, but like Clinton, is working for Obama now.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics | Comments Off on Video of Maya Angelou Introducing Michelle Obama In Greensboro, NC

It Is About the Economy for Main Street as well as Wall Street!

The Social Security Administration released its 2008 Fast Facts and Figures report this month and given our current economic crisis and the tsunami of Boomers getting ready to retire the report is informative, important and a reminder of critical financial challenges on the horizon. Some of the more notable facts and figures are as follows:

*SSA paid benefits to 54.7 million beneficiaries in 2007, but over the next two decades there will be 78 million Boomers first eligible to retire (beginning in 2008).

*Women accounted for 56% of adult Social Security recipients in 2007

*The average monthly benefit for women was $896 and for men was $1,184 in 2007.

*Aged non-married women and minorities have the highest rates of poverty relative to their aged counterparts. In 2006, 16.8% of aged nonmarried women lived in poverty and 10.2% are near poor. The statistics for minorities are even worse: 22.7% of aged Blacks lived in poverty and 9.8% are near poor; 19.4% of aged Hispanics lived in poverty and 10.3% are near poor.

*The report indicates that by 2017 the payments to beneficiaries will be greater than the payments in taxes. By 2041, under the current Social Security system structure, the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted.

Given the tumbling and insecure financial markets and, in turn, private pensions and retirement funds, the present and future security of Social Security benefits and Medicare becomes even more critical for all Americans.

It is about the economy and restoring security for Main Street as well as Wall Street.

–Francine Lipman

Share
Posted in Women and Economics | Comments Off on It Is About the Economy for Main Street as well as Wall Street!

Is Pussy Galore a “Feminist Icon”?

I’d have to go with “no.”

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Is Pussy Galore a “Feminist Icon”?

The Kip Tiernan Social Justice Fellowship

The Kip Tiernan  Social Justice Fellowship honors the life-long work of the founder of Rosie’s Place.

The Fellowship provides a unique and exciting opportunity for a woman to develop and carry out a special project  that will further the mission of Rosie’s Place anywhere in  New England.   Eligible projects could include: a policy initiative or campaign; a creative arts program; the development and implementation of a needed service; or the creation of an innovative project aimed at reducing poverty, promoting social justice  and empowering poor and homeless women.

The  Fellowship is 12 months long and is awarded on a one-time basis to an eligible woman.   Fellows are paid a $40,000 stipend.

Fellowship applications are  due by December 1st.  The winner is selected in the spring by a comittee comprised of members of the Rosie’s Place community.  The Fellowship begins the following summer/fall.

Information sessions are offered in person and via conference call each fall.   The information session will be held on Wednesday, October 22 at 6:00 p.m. at Rosie’s Place.   The conference call  session will be held on Tuesday, October 28 at 6:00 p.m. Please contact Rosie’s Place Executive Director Sue Marsh for any additional questions.

Click here to view the Fellowship Application

Click here to view the Fellowship FAQ’s

Share
Posted in Academia | Comments Off on The Kip Tiernan Social Justice Fellowship

CFP: Columbia J. of Gender & Law Symposium, “Gender on the Margins”

The Columbia Journal of Gender and Law announces an open call for papers addressing Gender on the Margins for its upcoming symposium to be held at Columbia Law School on April 10, 2009. Papers accepted for and presented at the Symposium will be published, as revised, in a themed volume.

This interdisciplinary symposium will explore intersections of gender and sexuality with traditionally marginalized groups. Perspectives are sought from academics and practitioners engaged in any field that touches on the study of gender, law and/or legal culture. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Gender and Homelessness
  • Gender and criminal justice
  • Gender and immigration
  • Gender and the political/electoral process
  • Gender, race and the welfare state
  • Gender and labor
  • Cultural perspectives on defining sexuality
  • Sexuality and children
  • Sexuality and government
  • Non-traditional households and parenting

Papers will be considered on any related theme. 300-500 word abstracts must be submitted to the Symposium Editor no later than November 26, 2008. Abstracts may be in Word, WordPerfect, PDF or RTF formats. If an abstract is accepted for the Symposium, a full draft paper must be submitted to the Symposium Editor by May 31, 2008.

 

Please send questions and submissions to:

JGLSymposium09@gmail.com

Or by mail to:

Columbia Journal of Gender and Law

Attn: Shilpi Agarwal

435 West 116th St.

New York, NY 10027

Email: sa2403@columbia.edu

Phone: (212) 854-1602

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation, Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on CFP: Columbia J. of Gender & Law Symposium, “Gender on the Margins”

Your Right to Choose…a Sandwich

Many smart people disagree with Linda Hirshman about many topics, but I think she was spot-on when she described feminism’s “critical failure” as the watering down of choice rhetoric to “an umbrella to put over anything any woman said she had decided to do.”  That failure allows politicians like Sarah Palin to cloak their conservative agendas with the language of “choice,” as David Cohen has blogged here.  

Today I noticed the rhetoric of choice in a sandwich ad.  This type of language is nothing new for those of us raised in the era of “Choosy Mothers Choose Jif.”  But “choice” in 1970’s and 1980’s ads connoted a selectivity or discernment.  The  Subway sandwich ad I saw today (above) uses the word in a very different sense.  The young girl’s “choice” of one particular fast-food sandwich is an exertion of personal preference in a world otherwise dominated by parental directives.

To me, this is just one more example of the way that “choice” has come to mean little more than “what I chose.”  Ok, I know I’m getting all worked up over a sandwich ad, but … choosy mothers choose to critique pop culture.  

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Your Right to Choose…a Sandwich

“I Kissed a Squirrel”

Here.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on “I Kissed a Squirrel”

Not the Babar You Remember

New  York’s Morgan Library is currently hosting “Drawing Babar:  Early Drafts and Watercolors,” a show  of “manuscript drafts, sketches, and watercolors, for the first book by each of Babar’s two authors, father and son Jean and Laurent de Brunhoff.”  The show is getting a fair amount of high-brow attention, including  this New Yorker article  by Adam Gopnick.

Babar was not among my favorite childhood characters.  I never understood the Old Lady, and I was upset that Babar’s mother was killed in the first few pages of the first book.  But there was enough that was interesting  about elephants wearing clothes and crowns to keep my attention as a 5 year-old, — even if the colonialism angle escaped me until, well, a good 15 years later.  

For those who haven’t spent any time with Babar lately, the books are worth making a detour through the children’s section of the local bookstore.  Babar’s Little Girl, to name just one  by Laurent de Brunhoff, has an interesting story-line with a visit by the elephants to their yoga-practicing, hang-gliding gay non-elephant friends.  

Children’s literature has always been subversive.  I just had to grow up to realize it.

-Bridget Crawford

 

Share
Posted in Recommended Books | Comments Off on Not the Babar You Remember

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights, South Carolina | Comments Off on

Cool Beer Blog

I was sorry I had to discover Impy Malting via a post about Internet harassment, but the author is an entertaining writer with a wonderful feminist bent and it’s fun to learn more about beer!

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Cool Beer Blog

Gender and Wage Disparity in the Legal Profession

From the ABA Journal, and blogged already by Ann (here):

The highest earners in 2007 were men in legal occupations, who earned a median salary in 2007 of $105,233, according to a Census Bureau report.

The online  report  issued in August shows women in legal occupations, which includes paralegal as well as lawyer positions, didn’t fare as well. Their median salary was $53,790. As a whole women in computer and mathematical professions earned more, with a median salary of $61,957.

The full ABA Journal article is available here.  You can read the details about the Census Bureau’s methodology, etc.  You can try to paint a rosier picture.  You can see the glass half full, blah blah blah.  But I haven’t heard much discussion of this news.  What sense are law students, lawyers and law professors making of this news?  Are we collectively too too depressed to discuss it?  Is the “news” not really news?    

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Legal Profession | Comments Off on Gender and Wage Disparity in the Legal Profession

Federal judge rules that refusal to hire based on gender identity is sex discrimination

Today, in the first ever victory directly on this point, the ACLU won a federal court decision holding that discrimination against a transgender person constitutes per se discrimination based on sex in violation of Title VII. In Schroer_v_Billington, Judge James Robertson of the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Library of Congress discriminated against Diane Schroer when it rescinded a job offer to her after Schroer disclosed that she was transitioning from male to female.

After a full trial (described in previous posts  here and  here), the judge found that Schroer should prevail on both of the legal theories offered by her lawyers.   First, the judge found that there was “compelling evidence that the Library’s hiring decision was infected by sex stereotypes.” On that basis, Schroer was entitled to relief under the line of cases beginning with Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), which created the sex stereotyping doctine. In that case, the Court found that Title VII was violated when a woman was denied a job after being told to wear make-up and take a course at charm school. Evidence in the Schroer trial established that the negative reaction to Schroer grew out of her not fitting gender stereotypes by virtue of her decision to change genders.

More important was the second theory: that discrimination based on gender transition is literally discrimination based on sex. Schorer’s lawyers argued, and the judge agreed, that gender identity is a component of sex and therefore discrimination based on gender identity is sex discrimination.   This might sound like a simple proposition, but previous federal courts have “carved [transgender] persons out of the statute by concluding that ‘transsexuality’ is unprotected by Title VII.”

The Schroer court held that just as discrimination against converts from one to faith to another is still discrimination based on religion, so too discrimination against transgender persons is still sex discrimination. Although doubtless Congress did not have transgender persons in mind when Title VII was enacted in 1964, the court found that the plain text of the statute covers this situation.

This is huge, both legally and politically. It’s an enormous breakthrough in the law.   The caveat is that it is a trial-level court decision, and the Justice Department (which represents all federal agencies in court) is likely to appeal it. It’s impossible to predict what the outcome of the appeal will be.   One cause for optimism is that the decision is based on a full factual record, including expert testimony on the key issue of gender identity being considered a component of sex. That will make it more difficult (though not impossible) for the court of appeals to reverse it.   Also, because the case does not involve a challenge to the validity of a federal statute, but only to the lawfulness of one hiring decision, the Justice Department could elect not to appeal (perhaps under a new AG?).

Politically, it recuperates the argument that Title VII already prohibits discrimination against transgender persons.   The Justice Department argued   that the passage of ENDA last year by the House of Representatives without gender identity protection signaled congressional intent not to protect transgender persons. Maybe, said Judge Robertson, or maybe Congress believes that Title VII, properly interpreted, solves the problem. In any event, the language of Title VII settled the question for him. This issue, too, of the legal consequence, if any, of the House vote last year could be re-argued if there is an appeal.

Nan Hunter – cross-posted at hunter of justice

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights | Comments Off on Federal judge rules that refusal to hire based on gender identity is sex discrimination

“Paradigm shifts and paying for sex”

Brilliant essay by S. M Berg, below is an excerpt

… The old prostitution paradigm sees prostitution as a women’s problem and thusly suggests fixing women as the solution. Identifiers of the old paradigm that circles around prostituted women are: permits for prostituted women, STD & AIDS checks for women, condoms for women, panic-buttons for women, bad date lines for women, unions for women, government registries for women,”whore college”for women, etc. In my less gracious moments I call proponents of this Victorian, women-as-moral-gatekeepers attitude towards prostitution the Build a Better Whore Brigade, and in generous moods I call them sex worker rights lobbyists.

The new prostitution paradigm, conceived by the Swedish Parliament in 1999, draws prostitution’s circle around the men who economically coerce sexual consent; the johns. Identifiers of this new paradigm are: criminalizing prostitute-using men, fining johns, jailing johns, instituting educational”john schools”, and publicizing the names of men caught sexually preying on vulnerable citizens. The average age of entry into Portland prostitution is 13-years-old not because there’s a lack of adult prostitutes here, but because Portland johns frequently, willingly choose to rape 13-year-olds.

The new john-centric paradigm is needed because prostitution legalization has failed to protect children and women from men’s violence. Legalization should have resulted in decreased male violence against women, decreased sexual slavery, decreased child prostitution, decreased drug dependency, and decreased STD & AIDS. Legalization has not borne out these theorized promises in places like Germany and The Netherlands, where politicians who originally supported legalization have since changed their minds because organized criminals continue to control prostitution despite legalization.

Recent news from the Netherlands adds fuel to the growing bonfire of the legalization paradigm’s death as a third of the red light district’s brothels were shut down for failing to stop illegal trafficking into legal brothels. When a 16-year-old Ukrainian girl who had her front teeth pulled out by a pimp was discovered working legally in a German brothel, it was a horrific wake-up call on the failed promises of legalized prostitution. …

Read the whole thing here.

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Feminism and Law, Sisters In Other Nations, Women and Economics, Women's Health | Comments Off on “Paradigm shifts and paying for sex”

Tony Infanti’s FLP Post Picked Up By The NYT’s Caucus Blog

Check it out here!

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Tony Infanti’s FLP Post Picked Up By The NYT’s Caucus Blog

A Fairly Memorable PSA About STDs

Here. Via Broadsheet.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on A Fairly Memorable PSA About STDs

Yet Another Way Health Insurance Companies Are Messing With People

My friend   W.   is on prescription medication that she can only obtain refills for every 30 days, so on every thirtieth day she has to go to a pharmacy. Last Friday when she got there after work, she found out that her health insurance company has a new rule: Her doctor has to fax a new thirty day prescription every thirty days, in addition to indicating that the prescription is refillable. Because it was 5:30 p.m., her doctor’s office was already closed. So she had to wait until the following Monday to obtain the medication she needs to live, having missed three doses, which saved the insurance company a few dollars, which was apparently the point. The new rule creates a mountain of extra paper work, labor and expense for doctors, multiplied by every patient’s every prescription, every thirty days. When doctors or patients do not get the paperwork to a pharmacy in time, medication is rendered unavailable for a while, which equals savings to the insurance company.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Women's Health | Comments Off on Yet Another Way Health Insurance Companies Are Messing With People

Hillary Rodham Clinton and Cecile Richards, “Blocking Care for Women”

NYT Op-Ed, reprinted below:

Last month, the Bush administration launched the latest salvo in its eight-year campaign to undermine women’s rights and women’s health by placing ideology ahead of science: a proposed rule from the Department of Health and Human Services that would govern family planning. It would require that any health care entity that receives federal financing : whether it’s a physician in private practice, a hospital or a state government : certify in writing that none of its employees are required to assist in any way with medical services they find objectionable.

Laws that have been on the books for some 30 years already allow doctors to refuse to perform abortions. The new rule would go further, ensuring that all employees and volunteers for health care entities can refuse to aid in providing any treatment they object to, which could include not only abortion and sterilization but also contraception.

Health and Human Services estimates that the rule, which would affect nearly 600,000 hospitals, clinics and other health care providers, would cost $44.5 million a year to administer. Astonishingly, the department does not even address the real cost to patients who might be refused access to these critical services. Women patients, who look to their health care providers as an unbiased source of medical information, might not even know they were being deprived of advice about their options or denied access to care.

The definition of abortion in the proposed rule is left open to interpretation. An earlier draft included a medically inaccurate definition that included commonly prescribed forms of contraception like birth control pills, IUD’s and emergency contraception. That language has been removed, but because the current version includes no definition at all, individual health care providers could decide on their own that birth control is the same as abortion.

The rule would also allow providers to refuse to participate in unspecified”other medical procedures”that contradict their religious beliefs or moral convictions. This, too, could be interpreted as a free pass to deny access to contraception.

Many circumstances unrelated to reproductive health could also fall under the umbrella of”other medical procedures.”Could physicians object to helping patients whose sexual orientation they find objectionable? Could a receptionist refuse to book an appointment for an H.I.V. test? What about an emergency room doctor who wishes to deny emergency contraception to a rape victim? Or a pharmacist who prefers not to refill a birth control prescription?

The Bush administration argues that the rule is designed to protect a provider’s conscience. But where are the protections for patients?

The 30-day comment period on the proposed rule runs until Sept. 25. Everyone who believes that women should have full access to medical care should make their voices heard. Basic, quality care for millions of women is at stake.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is a Democratic senator from New York. Cecile Richards is the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Reproductive Rights, Women's Health | 22 Comments

Who is the good Democrat? Him? Or me?

In a column entitled “Sarah Palin Naked” Michael Seitzman writes:

I realized three things tonight. For one, if you are a McCain/Palin/Bush voter, you and I do not have a difference of opinion. We have a difference in brain power. Two, she really is as ignorant as I feared. And, three, she really is kinda hot. Basically, I want to have sex with her on my Barack Obama sheets while my wife reads aloud from the Constitution. (My wife is cool with this if I promise to “first wipe off Palin’s tranny makeup.” I married well.)

But this is not at all sexist, says Michael Seitzman, and in a follow up column entitled “Sexist? Not So Fast” he schools us dumb feminist bitches on what sexism is, since he’s so much smarter and more knowledgeable about sexism than we are, writing:

I wrote something that a few people call offensive in a post of mine today. Granted, it’s pretty offensive. But if you think I’m going to apologize for it, you’re out of your mind. In case you missed it, the offending line is, “I want to have sex with her [Palin] on my Barack Obama sheets while my wife reads aloud from the Constitution.” In my business there’s an old expression, “Never cut funny.” And, excuse me, but that one’s kinda funny. The debate over whether I’m sexist is somewhat more serious.

“Sexism” is discrimination or unfairly diminishing someone based on gender. I haven’t discriminated against Sarah Palin based on her gender and I haven’t diminished her based on it. She’s diminished based on her intellect and experience and hubris and because they’re using her gender in such a crass and cynical manner. I’m discriminating against her based on that fact and that she has as much business on the national political stage as Alice from the Brady Bunch.

I don’t give a damn whether Palin has a penis or a vagina. When I wrote about Hillary Clinton during the primary I didn’t comment on her gender. I don’t care about her gender. Let me point out that I wrote an entire movie about sexual harassment (North Country — click on the link over there on the right side of your screen). Don’t you get it? I’m not insulting Sarah Palin, SHE IS INSULTING ME.

I wondered why I found the movie North Country so terrible, and its portrayals of women so hackneyed, offensive and false, and now I know.   It was written by a man who degrades and diminishes a woman he disagrees with as someone with “tranny make up” who he wants to “have sex with” and he belligerently denies that is sexist. He claims not to care “whether Palin has a penis or a vagina” but I’m thinking that given he has said he wants to have sex with her, he’s lying. To further illustrate how incredibly un-sexist he is, Seitzman follows up with this appalling observation:

Imagine for a moment that McCain had picked the latest winner of The Bachelor as his running mate. Would we be sexist if we commented on her looks? Of course not. Sorry if you don’t like it, but in my mind, there’s not much that separates Sarah Palin from the attractive yet vapid winner of a reality show. As far as I’m concerned, she IS the attractive yet vapid winner of a reality show.

I do not want to share a political affiliation with Michael Seitzman. If writing things like this makes him a good Democrat, I’m so out of the party. And I know I am not alone.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics, Sexism in the Media, Sociolinguistics | Comments Off on Who is the good Democrat? Him? Or me?

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on