No Girls Allowed

Iraq Three Years Later
with Noah Feldman, Victor Davis Hanson, Joe Klein, Kenneth M. Pollack, and Andrew Sullivan

Miller Theatre at Columbia University

“The United States invaded Iraq on March 20, 2003. Tonight, Miller Theatre marks the third anniversary by bringing together a panel of influential experts to talk about the war and issues relating to American involvement, from the justification for war to the current state of the war, and the domestic and international political implications of U.S. actions. Join us for an up-to-the-minute evaluation of the situation in Iraq by Noah Feldman, professor of law, New York University, and author of Divided By God: America’s Church-State Problem:and What We Should Do About It and What We Owe Iraq: War and the Ethics of Nation Building; Victor Davis Hanson, columnist for the National Review Online and author of A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War; Joe Klein, senior writer for TIME Magazine and author of Primary Colors; former National Security Council member Kenneth M. Pollack, Director of Research, Saban Center for Middle East Policy, and author of The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq; and Andrew Sullivan, essayist for TIME magazine, columnist for the Sunday Times of London, and senior editor at The New Republic.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on No Girls Allowed

“Searching for Angela Shelton”

From this site:

“In the documentary Searching for Angela Shelton, filmmaker Angela Shelton journeys across the United States meeting other Angela Sheltons in an effort to survey women in America. She discovers that 24 out of the 40 Angela Sheltons she spoke to had been raped, beaten or molested (now 28 out of 40). Then the filmmaker meets an Angela Shelton who tracks sexual predators and lives in the same town as the filmmaker’s father who molested her and her step siblings for years.

“The filmmaker’s survey of women becomes a journey of self-discovery during which she decides to finally confront her own past and her father – on Father’s Day. The Angela Sheltons complete the journey by teaching the filmmaker about forgiveness, faith and the power of the human spirit, no matter what your name is.”

You can watch a trailer here or here. A special version of the documentary with never-before-seen footage will air on Lifetime on April 22, 2006 at 11pm.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Law | Comments Off on “Searching for Angela Shelton”

Red State Feminist on: “Pro’s and Cons of Parenting Coordination”

Below is an excerpt, the full post is available here.

Parenting Coordination is taking off in a major way. Many states are adopting the practice of putting divorcing families in front of a Parenting Coordinator to lessen the number of expensive, destructive custody trials. A Parenting Coordinator, like a Mediator, focuses on both parents’ perspective and attempts to draw up a Parenting Plan that both parents can agree on. This includes primary residence, visitation, rights and duties, and may or may not include a child support agreement.

“In a way, I am very much in favor of the concept. Taking families out of the litigation forum is a wise idea. Courts were not designed to handle family dynamics and usually intensify any existing conflicts by the fact that civil courtrooms pit a petitioner and a respondent against one another, with the unfortunate “may the best man win” philosophy taking the lead. Hardly a formula for an outcome supposed to be based on “the best interest of the child”.

“However, like Mediation, Parenting Coordination has its pitfalls. It could become another one of many stations on the divorce railroad, prolonging the process, adding expense, and ultimately still ending up in front of a judge if an agreement isn’t reached.

“Additionally, like Mediation, Parenting Coordinators are not required to have a degree or license in most states yet. Anyone can attend a three day training program and get a certificate. Granted, many such programs will only admit social workers, attorneys, and other people in the field, but that’s not a guarantee for qualification. Is three days really all they need to do this difficult work?” …

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on Red State Feminist on: “Pro’s and Cons of Parenting Coordination”

Womenomics 101

“Womenomics 101” is an Alternet article with information and links about ways in which “American corporations — enabled by a political class dominated by men — continue to punish [women workers] for the high crime of being female.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Womenomics 101

“Standing at the Crossroads: Race Class and Art”

Standing at the Crossroads: Race Class and Art” is commentary by Kevin Alexander Gray, president of the South Carolina ACLU and contributing editor to Black News in Columbia, SC. Here is an excerpt:

…Whenever people say things like Hurricane Katrina”ripped the veil off racism and poverty”I am reminded of a line from a song in Craig Brewer’s film Hustle and Flow:”It might be new to you but it’s been like this for years.”In fact, the film pricked my race/class sensibilities more than anything else in the midst of the latest round of race talk.

Shot in the working-class neighborhoods of Brewer’s hometown, Memphis, Tennessee, Hustle and Flow is the story of DJay (played by Oscar nominee Terrence Howard), a pimp having a”midlife crisis.”He’s 35, the same age as his father when he died, and he fears his life will soon be over unless he changes course.

The film’s look, feel and sound are all intimately familiar. From the dirt on the walls of a shotgun house to the hot, wet, sticky red clay-tinted heat of a Southern summer and the ever-present, almost useless dirty portable fan. From the train track separating the haves from the have-nots to the get-by job that gets you to the weekend to the juke joint where anything happens. From the sound of the blues – even in rap music – right down to the neighborhood, language and attitudes, Brewer puts a face on the people that those such as Bill Cosby wish to be invisible. Some of them are even white. …

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Standing at the Crossroads: Race Class and Art”

Interview With Margaret Atwood

By Helen Brown, here. Atwood has a new collection of short, fictional essays out called “The Tent.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Interview With Margaret Atwood

The Objectification Blues

A poem by Molly E. Holzschlag that you can read here. Via Blackfeminism.org.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on The Objectification Blues

The Street Harassment Coalition

Read about The Street Harassment Coalition here. Also check out their blog, “A Week In the Life of a Woman on the Street.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on The Street Harassment Coalition

“Strength comes from refusing to be shamed”

A blogger who calls herself Manxome at “Climacteric Clambake” writes very powerfully about her experiences with sexual abuse here. (Part one is here. Part two is here.)

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Strength comes from refusing to be shamed”

“Confessions of a Porn User”

“The Geeky Feminist” discusses her experiences with pornography here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Confessions of a Porn User”

The NYT Asks “Why Do So Few Women Reach the Top of Big Law Firms?”

“The Bad Feminist” has some theories about that here. You can read the NYT piece here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on The NYT Asks “Why Do So Few Women Reach the Top of Big Law Firms?”

E.L. Doctorow’s “The March”

Last July I organized a panel discussion called “Southern Fried Feminism,” at the Southeastern Association of Law Schools 2005 Annual Meeting. My panelists included Deseriee Kennedy, who gave a feminist critique of “abstinence only” sex education as promulgated by the Christian Right, Adrienne Davis, who talked about feminism and legacies of slavery, and Susan Grover, who discussed feminism and female characters in Southern literature.   They are all terrific scholars and speakers, and if you ever get a chance to hear any of them present a paper, by all means take it. They drew a large and interested audience, and in the question and answer period there was a lot of discussion about the unique aspects and challenges of being a feminist in the American South.

I thought about that panel a lot as I read “The March” by E.L. Doctorow. While I might not go so far as to call this a “feminist book,” it does a decent job of including multidimensional female characters, and describing the hardships and challenges the Civil War imposed upon women. I found it to be a very engaging read. Of course, I took a special interest in the chapters recounting the burning of Columbia, South Carolina that occurred while Sherman’s army occupied my hometown.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Recommended Books | Comments Off on E.L. Doctorow’s “The March”

“Adapting Minds, Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature”

Nancy McClernan at Heavens to Mergatroyd has nice things to say about Adapting Minds, Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature by David J. Buller, such as:

“…what Buller lacks in user-friendly presentation he makes up for in his solid examination of the claims of evolutionary psychologists. I’ve only read a few chapters and already found refutations of EP that I hadn’t considered, like the fact that much of the results of the celebrated female desire for males with status actually boils down to “status homogamy” – the tendency of people to mate with those in their own status group. He points out that it’s very likely that studies have shown that women prefer high status men because the women studied, invariably white upper-class women in college, have high status themselves. He criticizes the methodology of David Buss and confirms what I suspected but hadn’t yet researched – that David Buss ignores cultural restrictions on female choice of mates.”

You can read the whole post here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Recommended Books | Comments Off on “Adapting Minds, Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature”

“Jane” Describes Why She Decided To Become A College Professor

From See Jane Compute:

“When people ask me to pinpoint what made me decide to become a college professor, I usually talk about the undergraduate research opportunity during my senior year in college, or any of the fabulous mentors I’ve had at various times in college and grad school. But while all of these are true, there’s one event in particular that, looking back now, really started me on my path to professordom.

“It was my junior year of college, and I was taking a class with the Professor From Hell. This professor was the type of person who would call on people at random with the intent to intimidate the hell out of the person. If he asked you a question and you happened to get it right, he would then ask you a much more difficult question, one you were much less likely to get right. I, as did many of my classmates, lived in fear of this man. Needless to say, the class environment was horrible.

“Like most of my classes, this class was overwhelmingly male. There were probably 65 people in the class, 5-6 of whom were women. For the most part, though, my male classmates had never given me, or any of the other women any trouble—no snide comments, no leaving us out of lab groups, etc.

“On this particular day, the professor was talking about image processing. He often taught off of slides, and today was no exception. It was time for him to show an example, and so up popped a slide, an image which he was going to run through various processing filters.

“Let’s just say that the image was overtly provocative.

“As if the sudden and unexpected appearance of this scantily-clad woman was not enough, the reaction of my classmates was even worse. These same men, who up until now had been largely supportive (or at least not overtly unsupportive), started cheering and whistling and making all sorts of comments. The professor stood up front with a broad grin on his face, allowing the cheers to go on and making no move to move the class onward and make his point.

“The few women were trying to make themselves as invisible as possible, slinking down in their seats, turning 18 shades of red, and looking like they wanted to be anywhere else but in that room at that time.

“I wish I could say that I was brave, that I stood up and called this asshole on his rude behavior. But I was a scared college kid, outnumbered. And so I kept my mouth shut, and prayed like mad for the class period to end. And my female classmates did the same thing. What else could we do? If we said anything, this professor would make our lives miserable for the rest of the term. If he wasn’t in any hurry to stop these shenanigans, and even instigated them, why would we think that he would listen to a reasonable protest?

“I still cringe when I think about that day, many years ago now. But that moment was a real turning point for me in several ways. Once I got over my embarrassment, I got angry. Really angry. And the more I thought about this incident, and this class in general, and how this professor treated us, I realized that there was no good reason why this should be an acceptable classroom environment. This was not a good way to learn. Perhaps the field needed people like me, who would be committed to making sure that no woman, or no man, would have to be embarrassed in the classroom in order to learn the finer points of this discipline. This really lit a fire under me, and made me think for the first time, seriously, about getting into academia as a means to change the environment in which my discipline is taught.

“The other reason why this incident was a turning point is because it was the catalyst that got me involved in my major. Up until that point, I dealt with the “impostor syndrome” by not hanging out with my classmates, by doing all of the work myself, by not reaching out to the other female students, by trying to make it on my own. After this happened, I realized the importance of “forming alliances” with the other women in my classes. I realized how valuable my female classmates were, and that maybe in the future we could help make the classroom environment better if we banded together, among other things. I wish I had learned this particular lesson earlier, because I missed out on some wonderful opportunities to get to know some truly fabulous women, but hey, better late than never.

“Today, years later, this incident still shapes the way I approach my job. I’m uber-concerned about the environment in my classroom, and I think very carefully about how to structure this environment to make my students feel comfortable learning and sharing with each other. I may not always succeed, but I owe it to my students to try my hardest to do so. This incident also explains another reason why I am so passionate about trying to achieve gender equality in this field: because until we achieve equality, until women are present in greater numbers, there will be bozos like this who make the environment for women toxic. It’s much easier to stand up to the bozos, to call them on their behavior, if there are more of us to make the call, and more of us with the power to make sure there are sanctions and consequences for such behavior. “

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Jane” Describes Why She Decided To Become A College Professor

Happy St. Patrick’s Day Llew!

abab.gif

Feminist Law Professor Llewellyn Gibbons (Toledo) and I met on March 17, 1995, and have been great friends ever since. As you might guess, there is a story involved, which is why we remember the date so vividly: I was interviewing for a Graduate Fellowship at Temple, and because it was St. Patrick’s Day, I decided that it would be funny to wear a bright green dress and shamrock barrette to the interview, and so I did. I later learned from Llew that I almost didn’t get the position because a couple of the Temple folks thought my clothing choice was alarming and unprofessional. Many thanks to the majority of the hiring committee voters, who took a chance on a “green” aspiring academic!

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on Happy St. Patrick’s Day Llew!

“Dean Dad’s” Retirement Letter Template

From the blog “Confessions of a Community College Dean”  

I’ve seen a few retirement letters recently, and I’m beginning to notice some conventions of the genre. If you’re a full professor and you’re getting ready to throw in the towel, feel free to borrow from this template to save time.

————-

After x years at x college, I am calling it a career. I will miss my colleagues terribly. We have bravely held the line against cultural decay in its many insidious forms, and I have relished the good fight.

The college is still a wonderful place, despite the efforts of its administration. The deans and vice presidents I have encountered have been, to a one, vermin, feeding on the waste products of academe. They are not fit to tie a scholar’s shoes, not that they would know a scholar if he bit them on the ass. I am certain to see them in hell. The President is a ratfink, a drunk, an adulterer, and a tragic waste of oxygen. I say this out of love.

The students, God bless ‘em, are as dumb as a sack of hammers. They just don’t have the moral fiber to do the reading anymore, and if they did, they wouldn’t understand it. All they care about is their ipods and their sex lives. Still, I’ll miss the dumb bastards. They remind me of my kids from my first marriage. I have devoted my career to education, and the little pricks’ failure to appreciate me is truly their loss.

As I spend my golden years with my grandchildren, or traveling all over the world, I will reflect fondly from time to time on my time here. Then, I will order another drink, one with an umbrella in it.

Fondly,

Prof. A. Pat O’saurus.

———

For maximum impact, it’s a good idea to email this to the entire campus. Then sit back and feel the love come pouring in.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on “Dean Dad’s” Retirement Letter Template

Shark-Fu on Abortion and Sex Education

Shark-Fu blogs at “Angry Black Bitch” and she has a a few things to say about reproductive rights. If cuss words give you the vapors, this is probably not the post for you:

…”As most of you know, a bitch volunteers with teenage mothers at several local shelters. Some of these mothers chose to have their babies and some of them were simply too far along in their pregnancies to have any viable choices beyond adoption or keeping the child post birth. This illuminates the issue of ‘choice’ in Missouri and many other states within the union. Choice has not been as simple as choice for quite some time.

“Freedom of choice requires freedom of information. The anti-choice movement has steadily been restricting access to reproductive information for years. Most of my current disgust at the advocates of anti-choice policies stems from that fact.

“See, a bitch would like abortion to be rare as a motherfucker. Safe is followed by legal, which is followed by rare. My ass is one of millions of Americans who works diligently to educate my community…both men and women…on the various choices they have and options available that will assist in lowering the number of unplanned pregnancies. And a bitch averages at least 5 women per 6 month class session who have no fucking idea how their reproductive system works, what the real health risks and advantages are associated to contraception and what family planning is.

“An average of 5 women…usually out of a total of 10 to 15…have to be educated about their reproductive cycle, how sex may result in pregnancy, what contraceptive methods are available to them and/or how to choose the best method. And Average of 5 women per class cycle relate misinformation about contraception…feel that using the pill may make them unable to have a baby in the future…believe that the pill may protect them against sexually transmitted diseases…feel that it is inappropriate to ask their sexual partner to use a condom because it ‘assumes that they are sick’…strongly believe that they can not contract a sexually transmitted disease from oral sex…think the withdrawal method works…think that you can ‘tell by looking at someone’ if they have a sexually transmitted disease…and do not feel that they need to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases until they are pregnant because they ‘feel fine’.

“A bitch has met the victims of rape, incest and exploitation who believed that they could douche the problem away. A bitch has listened to women who have three or four chil’ren but ‘aren’t sure if they have ever had an orgasm’ and ‘did it because they needed to keep their man’.

“One current student engaged in over 60 unprotected sexual encounters in an effort to ‘get rid of those sinful feelings for women’ and sincerely hopes that her child ‘helps her not be a dyke anymore’.

“The sad reality is that anti-choice advocates are creating more unplanned pregnancies through their ignorance is bliss policies…and those of us in the trenches are shoveling in a downpour. A bitch struggles to understand the logic and finds that there is none.

“Any group that wants to decrease the number of unplanned pregnancies in America needs to start with comprehensive education. Abstinence…yes! And…oh, and that ‘and’ is one massive motherfucking word…comprehensive sex education so that each individual is armed with the facts, the options and the tools to make an educated decision about their life and their body.

“But comprehensive sex education does not…will not…eliminate rape or incest. Comprehensive sex education will not eliminate exploitation or abuse.

“The morning after pill will not eliminate the fact that many women do not seek medical care or go to the authorities after an assault…that unplanned pregnancy will still happen…that people will get busy regardless of the ramifications.

“And abstinence education will not eliminate unplanned pregnancies…the fact that society has no viable mechanism for dealing with them post Roe…the fact that parenting skills do not automatically kick in when a person has a baby…the fact that our foster care system is overwhelmed, adoptions have been replaced by infertility treatments, babies are still tossed into dumpsters like trash…and America prefers to debate abortion rather than our failure as a society to truly protect life, ensure liberty and clear the fucking wreckage blocking the pursuit of happiness.” …

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Shark-Fu on Abortion and Sex Education

Dr. Crazy on “The Rules of Feminism”

Dr. Crazy teaches undergraduates and blogs at “Reassigned Time.”   Here is an excerpt of one of her recent posts:

“For those of you who don’t recognize the title of this post, it’s a quotation from the movie Mean Girls, in which Gretchen Wieners explains to Cady that the “rules of feminism” include not “liking” or dating the ex-boyfriend of another girl. Apparently, if my students’ papers are any indication, the “rules of feminism” also include an implicit belief that “young girls,” “teen girls,” and even women are “impressionable” and “very easily influenced by the media,” which is what makes them get eating disorders, have poor self-concepts, dress like sluts, act like sluts, and I’m not sure what else. What I have learned from these papers is that “young boys” don’t have similar problems, and that my (primarily female) students who chose to write about these issues have internalized all of this shit about what it means to be female in our culture that a) constructs women as victims, b) constructs girls and women as total slaves to any media they consume, c) constructs women as unthinking and vain creatures who will do anything to get the attention of men (which, of course, their arguments explain, is wrong, not because it’s inherently wrong to define oneself in relation to men, but because beauty is about what’s on the inside and/or one can be sexy without whoring it up and baring her navel).

“This isn’t a post about the “influence of the media.” It’s not a post about the causes of eating disorders or about whether 12-year-old-girls should dress like hoochies. At the end of the day, I don’t really care where these students come down on any of these things. I care that they make a nuanced argument and that they support it with strong examples and analysis within a solid rhetorical structure. I’m a writing teacher, and so those are my things, you know? (Incidentally, the course that I teach has a theme of celebrity in contemporary culture, so I knew I was taking the risk of getting these papers when I designed it, but at the same time, I did not ask them to write on this specific topic. The assignment was to perform a comparative analysis of two texts in the service of some broader argument about celebrity.) This is a post about the fact that my students so readily accept the idea that girls and women are these unthinking sponges that are entirely constructed through consumption. They do not interrogate this idea, nor do they wonder whether consumption affects male subjects in our culture similarly. They do not think critically about these issues at all. At the same time, they believe that the papers that they are writing about “young girls” and how detrimental popular culture is to them are in some way exemplary of how far women have come and the fact that women should not be objectified. (Although I should note that most would never use the word “objectified” nor would they call themselves “feminists.” These students generally fall into the “I’m not a feminist, but…” camp.)

“One of the difficulties of being a feminist and being a teacher is trying to strike a balance between letting students come to their own personal feminisms on their own intellectual paths and challenging their assumptions about what it means to be a girl, a woman, a feminist when those assumptions are overly simplistic or just plain screwed up. This becomes even more of a challenge when one is not in a classroom that is designated as fulfilling the “race/gender” general studies requirement because one faces the potential resentment of students who feel like I don’t have the authority to challenge their claims outside of that context.” …

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Dr. Crazy on “The Rules of Feminism”

Women in Iran

I can’t vouch for the source of this post entitled: “IRAN’S BRUTAL ASSAULT … ON WOMEN CELEBRATING INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY” but click on the link and see what you think, in terms of credibility potential. The claim is that: “a peaceful gathering of women’s rights activists, women’s groups and human rights defenders who had gathered in Park Daneshjoo (Student Park) …, in commemoration of March 8th, International Women’s Day, ended in violence, when they were attacked and assaulted by plain clothes militia, special anti riot forces of the Revolutionary guards, soldiers and police.” Commenters express cynicism at the site, which you will see if you scroll down. I can’t find substantive confirmation of the incident in the “mainstream” press, but of course that doesn’t mean it didn’t transpire as reported, and I did find this and this, suggesting at least that something happened.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Sisters In Other Nations | Comments Off on Women in Iran

Pink Taxis

From a site called “The Cool Hunter

pinkcabs.jpg

“If your a woman, the very thought of getting a sleazy cab driver is scarier than reliving Charles and Camilla’s wedding on DVD. Well girls, cast your fears aside, the Pink Ladies have arrived. When we say Pink Ladies, we are not talking Rizo, Frenchy and Sandy, we are referring to an all female cab company. The Pink Ladies own the company, drive the cabs and will only pick up female passengers. Hailing one down wont quite work, female users must first register with the companies customer database. Once in the cab, there is no need for cash, as registered users are billed after use. Great for those nights when your last bit of cash was used for a Cosmopolitan. Launching in May in the U.K, the concept is the brainchild of two moms who wanted female passengers to feel safer. Through a phone call and a text message, your female driven cab arrives to your pick up point to find you confidently awaiting it’s arrival.”

“With 10% of proceeds going towards Breast Cancer Research, The Pink Ladies are set to spread U.K wide.”

*************************************************

The idea has a certain appeal, but the grammar of the advert is a little scary, and the bawdy final clause of that last sentence contrasts rather disconcertingly with the “we’ll keep you unsullied by boy germs” ethos of the concept.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on Pink Taxis

Justice Ginsburg Describes “Threats” to O’Connor and Herself

I’m never sure whether it’s best to ignore or publicize something like this, but since Justice Ginsburg brought it out into the open, I’m inclined to follow her lead. I know that like me, most of the law profs reading this have great affection for Justice Ginsburg, as she is a true sister, and a loyal, brilliant and effective feminist.

Justice Ginsburg reveals details of threat

By GINA HOLLAND
ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

“Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she and former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor have been the targets of death threats from the “irrational fringe” of society, people apparently spurred by Republican criticism of the high court.

“Ginsburg revealed in a speech in South Africa last month that she and O’Connor were threatened a year ago by someone who called on the Internet for the immediate “patriotic” killing of the justices.

“Security concerns among judges have been growing.

“Conservative commentator Ann Coulter joked earlier this year that Justice John Paul Stevens should be poisoned. Over the past few months O’Connor has complained that criticism, mainly by Republicans, has threatened judicial independence to deal with difficult issues like gay marriage.

“Worry is not limited to the Supreme Court. Three quarters of the nation’s 2,200 federal judges have asked for government-paid home security systems, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said this week.

“Ginsburg said the Web threat was apparently prompted by proposals in Congress, filed by Republicans, that tell judges to stop relying on foreign laws or court decisions.

“It is disquieting that they have attracted sizable support. And one not-so-small concern – they fuel the irrational fringe,” she said in a speech posted online by the court earlier this month and first reported Wednesday by LegalTimes.com.

“According to Ginsburg, someone in a Web site chat room wrote: “Okay commandoes, here is your first patriotic assignment … an easy one. Supreme Court Justices Ginsburg and O’Connor have publicly stated that they use (foreign) laws and rulings to decide how to rule on American cases. This is a huge threat to our Republic and Constitutional freedom. … If you are what you say you are, and NOT armchair patriots, then those two justices will not live another week.”

“Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla., a sponsor of one of the congressional proposals, wrote about the legislation on his Web site and in bold letters featured a quote from O’Connor predicting the Supreme Court would probably increasingly rely on foreign courts.

“Ginsburg pointed out that the legislation was first proposed in 2004, an election year.

“According to the legislation’s promoters, the Feeney proposal had 82 Republican and 2 Democratic co-sponsors. One supporter was former Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas, a lawmaker O’Connor has criticized – although not by name – for harshly denouncing judges.

“Justices, in some of their most hotly contested rulings, have looked overseas. Last year, for example, justices barred the executions of juvenile killers on a 5-4 vote. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy said then that “it is proper that we acknowledge the overwhelming weight of international opinion against the juvenile death penalty.” DeLay called the ruling outrageous. He also suggested that the House consider impeaching some judges.

“In an angry dissent to that decision, Justice Antonin Scalia said capital punishment policy should be set by states, not “the subjective views of five members of this court and like-minded foreigners.”

“Ginsburg said, “Critics in Congress and in the media misperceive how and why U.S. courts refer to foreign and international court decisions.” She said those decisions are used for guidance only.

“O’Connor said last week during a speech at Georgetown Law School that the justices have received threats. But the Ginsburg remarks at the Constitutional Court of South Africa provide unusual detail.

“Ginsburg, who turned 73 Wednesday, told the audience O’Connor “remains alive and well – as for me, you can judge for yourself.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on Justice Ginsburg Describes “Threats” to O’Connor and Herself

“Feminism and Women Under 40” at Pace Law School on March 21

On Tuesday, March 21, 2006, at 7:00 p.m., Pace Law School is sponsoring a panel discussion, “Feminism and Women Under 40,” as part of its Public Policy Lecture Series. Here is a description of the program:

As baby boomers enter retirement, likewise “feminism” is fading from the mainstream and becoming a reference point for the past. Of the social movements of the last 30 years, the women’s movement is perhaps most at risk of “slipping backwards” in the first decade of the new millennium but do the women it impacts most even care? There are challenging political, professional and cultural paradoxes – is Hillary Clinton bringing women closer to the top of the ticket or further away? Can corporations do more if women don’t want to ? Is Lara Croft a feminist icon or a feminist nightmare? Why have Ali McBeal and Murphy Brown been replaced by Desperate Housewives at the same time business schools are becoming dominated by women? Is feminism extinct, obsolete or evolved? Has the notion of a “social movement” been replaced by a new emphasis on”personal choice”? This panel examines the current needs and challenges for feminism to engage and involve the generation that must drive it into the new millennium.

The moderator for the panel is Carolyn Carter, President and CEO of Grey Global Group Europe, Middle East & Asia. Speakers include Bridget Crawford, Jean Sera, Rachel Littman, Courtney Martin, Jehmu Greene and Enshalla Anderson. Speaker profiles here.

The event is free and open to the public. Directions and reservations are available here.

–Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Upcoming Conferences, Upcoming Lectures | Comments Off on “Feminism and Women Under 40” at Pace Law School on March 21

Conference on “Law & Adolescence” at Temple U’s Beasley School of Law this weekend!

LAW AND ADOLESCENCE

The Legal Status, Rights and Responsibilities

of Adolescent Youth Involved in the Child Welfare,

Juvenile or Criminal Justice Systems

A Symposium at Temple University‘s

Beasley School of Law

March 17-18, 2006

Klein & Shusterman Halls

This two-day national conference will bring together scholars, attorneys, judges and other professionals from practice and research in the fields of law, psychology, criminology, sociology, and other social sciences. Presentations will examine how research on adolescent development affects (or should affect) policies and court decisions for state-involved youth.


For more information contact the Temple Law Reveiw at (215) 204-7868 or tlrsymp@temple.edu

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Conference on “Law & Adolescence” at Temple U’s Beasley School of Law this weekend!

About This Blog, Redux

Started less than two months ago, sometime today this blog will hit the “20,000 pageloads” mark. About half of those pageloads were generated by me, editing and checking up on things (I exaggerate, but less than you might think), but still, not too shabby! The very first post went up Janury 20th of this year and I didn’t know if anybody at all would be interested in something like this, so I’m very pleased by the response so far.

I wanted to thank my co-bloggers, especially Bridget Crawford, Stephanie Farrior and Marina Angel, for their contributions, and remind everyone to e-mail things you’d like to see posted to: feministlawprof@yahoo.com

This blog does not and will not run commercial advertisements. Its main purpose is to facilitate communication within the feminist law prof community. Let me know about any suggestions you have for improving it.

I spotted this paragragh in a post by Maia about Internet communication spaces at Alas, A Blog:

“Our society is sexist and misogynist. What this means is that if we create a supposedly free space for communication it’ll replicate the sexist and misogynist patterns found in mainstream society, unless we take conscious action to change those sexist and misogynist patterns. The same is true for all other power structures in our society, they will all be replicated in the free space.”

I think Maia is correct about that, and wanted to thank everyone who reads and/or links to this blog for their support for this effort to provide a useful and comfortable web space for feminist law professors.

with warmest regards,
Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on About This Blog, Redux

Conference on the Intersection of Intellectual Property and Gender in DC at Am U Law on 3/24

IP/Gender: The Unmapped

Connections

Friday, March 24, 2006
10:00 AM – 5:00 PM
(Reception to Follow)


This program brings together scholars in Intellectual Property and Gender Studies to present innovative scholarship that unites these two fields. This will be the third in a series of workshops discussing the intersection of gender-related imbalances in wealth; cultural access; political power, and social control; creative production and gender; the effect of stereotyping and the feminization and masculinization of participant roles in intellectual property; the gendered development of IP doctrine; and feminist jurisprudence insights about intellectual property law.

American University, Washington College of Law
4801 Massachusetts Ave. NW ~ Room 603
Washington, DC 20016

event registration:
www.wcl.american.edu/secle/cle_form.cfm
or call 202-274-4148

Free to the Public
CLE Credit Available*

additional information & schedule:

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Conference on the Intersection of Intellectual Property and Gender in DC at Am U Law on 3/24

Read or Written Anything About Technology And Gender Lately?

Eszter Hargittai at Crooked Timber writes:
“The University of Michigan Press is putting together a volume called The Best of Technology Writing 2006. The editorial team is soliciting suggestions for pieces, including blog posts.

[W]e’re asking readers to nominate their favorite tech-oriented articles, essays, and blog posts from the previous year. The competition is open to any and every technology topic:biotech, information technology, gadgetry, tech policy, Silicon Valley, and software engineering are all fair game. But the pieces that have the best chances of inclusion in the anthology will conform to these three simple guidelines:

    1. They’ll be engagingly written for a mass audience; if the article requires a doctorate to appreciate, it’s probably not up our alley. Preference will be given to narrative features and profiles,”Big Think”op-eds that make sense, investigative journalism, sharp art and design criticism, intelligent policy analysis, and heartfelt personal essays.

    2. They’ll be no longer than 5,000 words.

    3. They’ll explore how technological progress is reshaping our world.

“The resulting publication will be available both in book form and online.

“Hop on over to digitalculture.org for more information and to submit your nominations.”

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Read or Written Anything About Technology And Gender Lately?

Some Missouri Republicans Oppose Giving Poor Access To Contraceptives

“Fired Up Missouri” reports:

“Yesterday, during debate on HB1010, the budget for the Departments of Health and Mental Health, House Republicans voted to ban county health clinics from providing family planning services.

“So the GOP has finally come clean that they are opposed to contraception. The used to argue that they opposed family planning because Planned Parenthood played a role. But now the GOP has targeted family planning provided by the county health clinics. Their action is a direct attack on women’s access to traditional family planning services.

“The amendment, offered by Rep. Susan Phillips (R-Kansas City) removed “voluntary choice of contraception, including natural family planning” as one of the permissible services that county health clinics could provide with state funding.

“A few weeks ago when I wrote about Governor Matt Blunt and Senator Jason Crowell’s opposition to birth control, some Fired Up! readers thought I was surely exaggerating. But now the GOP’s real agenda of making family planning more difficult has been laid bare for all to see.”

Share
Posted in Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Some Missouri Republicans Oppose Giving Poor Access To Contraceptives

More About New Orleans

Via Jessica at Feministing:

“The Newcomb College Center for Research on Women–in collaboration with the New Orleans Women’s Studies Consortium, The New Orleans Network, and Girl Gang Productions–has put out a podcast of International Women’s Day: Addresses on the Matter of New Orleans, an event that took place at Tulane University’s Newcomb College…

“The podcast includes speeches from the New Orleans Women’s Studies Consortium, Incite! Women of Color Against Violence, NOLA Queer Women’s Project, a “Women of the Storm” panel discussion, among others.

“Listen to it here.

NB: Read Marina Angel’s post about New Orleans below if you haven’t.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on More About New Orleans

“The Torn-Up Credit Card Application”

creditcard_application_titl.jpg

This will make you even more nervous about the possibility of identity theft:
Page One. Page Two. Page Three. Page Four. Yikes.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on “The Torn-Up Credit Card Application”

Law Professor Blogger Census

Collected by Daniel Solove, it is available here.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on Law Professor Blogger Census

Feminism and Happiness

Three interesting blog posts that you might enjoy:

1. “What’s Happiness Got to Do With It?” at Mad Melancholic Feminista

2. “Proud (and happy) to be a miserable feminist” at Rude Barbie

3. “Has The Civil Rights Movement Made African-Americans Happier? (And Other Stupid Questions)” at The Happy Feminist

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Feminism and Happiness

Conference at UNC-Chapel Hill: “The Pre/Post Enlightenment Visuality of Djuna Barnes’s NIGHTWOOD (1936)” on March 22

Wednesday March 22, 4:30-6:00 PM
Bingham 103, UNC-Chapel Hill

Erin G. Carlston, English, UNC-Chapel Hill: “The Beast Turning Human, or Sleeping with Wolves.”

María DeGuzmán, English and Latina/o Studies, UNC-Chapel Hill: “The Pre/Post Enlightenment Visuality of Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood.”

Carisa Showden, Political Science, UNC-Greensboro: “Alibi: Voices from Elsewhere.”

Patricia Juliana Smith, English, Hofstra University: “‘Any Permanent Mistake Like Me’: The Queerness of Catholicism in Djuna Barnes’s Nightwood.”

Respondent: Dr. Karen Jacobs, English, University of Colorado
(Boulder): “Nightwood’s Photographic Imaginary.”

Papers by Professors DeGuzmán, Smith and Carlston (presented in collaboration with Dr. Showden) will be interspliced with a collectively produced visual project rendering significant scenes of Djuna Barnes’s classic 1936 lesbian novel Nightwood into condensed narrative photo-sequences; Dr. Jacobs’s response seeks to place the entire project within a history of queer visual representation. This project bridges past and present; text and visual image; various kinds of visual art forms (drawing, painting, and photography); and analysis and enactment/performance.

All members of the academic and artistic community are invited to enjoy, experience and reflect on queer literature and art with us. Sponsored by the Provost’s Advisory Board for LGBTQ Life & Study at Carolina and the Program in Sexuality Studies; the Department of English; and Women’s Studies at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

More information about “Camera Query” here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Conference at UNC-Chapel Hill: “The Pre/Post Enlightenment Visuality of Djuna Barnes’s NIGHTWOOD (1936)” on March 22

“Britain defies US with funding to boost safe abortion services”

From The Guardian on Feb 6, 2006:

“The British government will today publicly defy the United States by giving money for safe abortion services in developing countries to organisations that have been cut off from American funding.

“Nearly 70,000 women and girls died last year because they went to back-street abortionists. Hundreds of thousands of others suffered serious injuries.

“Critics of America’s aid policy say some might have lived if the US had not withdrawn funding from clinics that provide safe services – or that simply tell women where to find them.

“The “global gag” rule, as it has become known, was imposed by President George Bush in 2001. It requires any organisation applying for US funds to sign an undertaking not to counsel women on abortion – other than advising against it – or provide abortion services.

“The UK will today become the founder donor of a fund set up specifically to attempt to replace the lost dollars and increase safe abortion services.” …

Read the full story here.

–Stephanie Farrior

Share
Posted in Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on “Britain defies US with funding to boost safe abortion services”

OC Rape Survivor’s Statement

Here is an account of the verdict; more analyisis here, at “Pinko Feminist Hellcat.” And here is the full text of Jane Doe’s statement to the court. An excerpt is below:

…”The harassment and torture started immediately after the assault became known to the public. It started with private investigators sitting in front of our house day in and day out, watching our every move. Our family’s privacy was completely eliminated. The private investigators got worse when they began watching my parents at their places of work. One day I was driving home and a private investigator began following me. I panicked. I did not know what to do. I called my mom on her cell phone for help. All she could do was tell me to drive to the police station and try to calm down. In the parking of the police station the private investigator cornered me and began taking pictures of me.

“I was still on the phone, hysterically crying for my mother’s help. I will never forget the terror and helplessness I heard in her voice. It tore me to pieces. These men have ruined me and my life, but now they are also ruining the lives of people that I loved the most. I had to stop driving alone because I was always being followed. I had to live a life in which I had to have permission to move, and my every move had to be observed for my safety. I didn’t understand – “Why were they still torturing me? Wasn’t that one night enough for them?” I guess not, because the harassment and intimidation continued.

“The next big event was when fliers were placed in all the mailboxes, local stores of my neighborhood. They asked for anyone with information on the Newport Beach assault that occurred on or about July Fourth to call a number. That flier said my last name. My family never sent out the fliers like they portrayed. It was the families of these three men. Now my entire neighborhood knew I was Jane Doe, the 16-year-old girl that was gang-raped.”…

She went through a whole lot of awfulness. I hope that she finds some peace.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law | Comments Off on OC Rape Survivor’s Statement

Myrna Raeder: “Gender-Related Issues in a Post-Booker Federal Guidelines World”

Here is the abstract:

“This article updates, expands and revises the author’s previous works concerning gender in sentencing in light of Booker. It describes the dramatic increase of the female incarcerated population in the federal system due primarily to drug offenses. It discusses the Guidelines concerted effort to produce identical sentences for men and women who commit similar crimes, which imposed draconian costs on families as well as on women who do not resemble the violent male drug dealers who inspired the severe federal drug penalties. Gender related differences concerning the impact of sentencing policy on children and on loss of parental rights by mothers are discussed. Booker’s reasonableness analysis is analyzed as providing the flexibility to approve non-guidelines sentences based on gender-related factors. The practice of requiring judges to decide the appropriateness of discouraged downward departures before issuing non-guidelines sentences is critiqued as hindering more holistic sentencing of defendants.

“The author also criticizes the guidelines discouragement of family ties departures, and argues that a completely gender-neutral sentencing scheme is bad policy because it has the potential of increasing intergenerational crime by ignoring the gendered realities of caregiving in our current society. A Guidelines amendment is proposed making children a legitimate departure factor in assessing the sentence of nonviolent sole and primary caretakers in light of constitutional and policy considerations viewing the family as a fundamental liberty interest. The difficulty posed by the “Girlfriend Problem” in drug conspiracy cases is addressed, and reasons are advanced as to why gender related issues are legitimate sentencing factors in relation to other departures that have gendered applications. In addition, issues currently viewed as only relevant to corrections are posited as legitimate sentencing factors. Thus, concerns relating to pregnancy and childbirth, family visits, privacy, staff sexual misconduct and lack of access to appropriate programming are viewed as relevant to determining a just sentence. Finally, the Bureau of Prisons regulations concerning community correctional centers are critiqued and the author urges the expanded of community corrections for women offenders and their children.”

It can be downloaded here.

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off on Myrna Raeder: “Gender-Related Issues in a Post-Booker Federal Guidelines World”

That “Men’s Reproductive Rights” Suit

The National Center for Men has brought a lawsuit it is calling: ROE vs. WADE… FOR MEN TM

Yes, the organization is apparently asserting trademark rights in the phrase “Roe vs. Wade… for Men,” and I can’t be the only one having flashbacks to those old “Hair Club For Men” tv commercials in which Sy Sperling confessed:”I’m not only the Hair Club President, I’m also a client!”

NB: You can google “National Center for Men” to see their site, I prefer not to link. Now about that suit:

After she “ruminated seriously about men’s reproductive choice for a whole 10 seconds” Amy’s Brain Today at Feminist Reprise “came up with some suggestions for helping these poor guys control their fertility.” You can read them here.

“Shakespeare’s Sister” has posted some related commentary here, and Twisty at “I Blame the Patriarchy” comments here.
–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on That “Men’s Reproductive Rights” Suit

Planned Parenthood Has A Blog!

It’s called “Now What?!”   I admire their nominative restraint!

Share
Posted in Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Planned Parenthood Has A Blog!

Lani Guinier to Speak at the U. of Michigan’s Institute for Research on Women and Gender on March 20th

More information, and a very nice photo of Lani, here.

Share
Posted in Upcoming Lectures | Comments Off on Lani Guinier to Speak at the U. of Michigan’s Institute for Research on Women and Gender on March 20th

The New Orleans Disaster

I just spent four days at Loyola Law School in New Orleans delivering presentations to faculty and students. Television and the print media have not given us an adequate sense of the disaster that was and that continues. 80% of New Orleans was under water and even houses that did not sustain flood damage shared in experiencing extensive wind and rain damage. You were lucky if you had insurance and experienced wind and rain damage because that coverage was comprehensive. Flood insurance was totally inadequate.

Only a quarter to a third of the city’s residents have returned. Many returnees are living with relatives or sharing space in cramped trailers. Only a few of those who needed trailers got them. Some who got trailers are still waiting for keys. Many trailers have no water or electricity. On the way to church on Sunday we traveled through miles of uninhabitable homes. The Greek Orthodox Church of The Holy Trinity is the oldest Greek Orthodox congregation in America. Due to the efforts of parishioners and assistance from throughout the country, the church itself has been fully restored, but the attached community hall, school, and office space have not. At least a third of the parishioners have not returned, and it is not known if they will.

I stayed with a Loyola faculty member and her family. Her sister-in-law is currently living with them, because her house needs to be demolished. Wherever we drove there were both black and white poor, middle class, and wealthy neighborhoods that were all uninhabitable. On the day that we”formally”went to see the devastation, we drove for four hours through diverse areas with almost no occupied homes or trailers.

Some people who have returned are trying to salvage or rebuild their homes, but most are waiting to see what the federal government is going to do. In every other natural disaster, the federal government has quickly provided disaster and rebuilding relief. Very little has been done in the six months since Katrina. Yesterday George Bush had the audacity to blame it on Congress. This situation needs intelligent and strong leadership, and it has not been provided.

The overall effect of Katrina is similar to the tsunami which hit southeast Asia, except these are our own people. Where is George W? Is the Republican controlled federal government purposely failing to provide assistance because New Orleans is an overwhelmingly democratic city, and they don’t want the population to return?

Loyola New Orleans Law School, a small and relatively poor institution, had the social conscience to run classes in Houston for it’s first year students and those of Tulane University. The University of Houston donated space. Although schools around the U.S. took in second and third year law students from New Orleans, first years could not be accommodated because first year classes begin early. Loyola also ran specialized Louisiana Civil Law classes for those Loyola and Tulane third year students who need them to take the Louisiana bar exam. Tulane University, a much bigger and better endowed school, used the opportunity provided by Katrina to fire approximately 400 tenured faculty, eliminate entire schools and departments, and totally reorganize the university. Tulane provided no classes for its students.

Pressure needs to be brought on every level of the federal government to immediately provide disaster relief for rebuilding. The levees must be raised and strengthened. New Orleanians cannot rebuild until they know that they can survive the next hurricane season, which will arrive in less than six months.

–Marina Angel

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on The New Orleans Disaster

One Can Only Hope This Is A Joke

According to RollOnFriday, twenty lawyers at the UK law firm Irwin Mitchell “were surprised last Friday to receive an email telling them that they had been selected as the firm’s most ‘photogenic’ people.” “We are currently in the process of having a series of photo shoots to build a photo library for the firm to use in future promotional materials,” Richard Dearden, the firm’s new media manager allegedly wrote in an email. “We’ve trawled the intranet and pulled together our most photogenic people for potential models.”


Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on One Can Only Hope This Is A Joke

Legal Affairs “Reviews” Catharine MacKinnon

The piece, accessible here, is vaguely styled as a book review, but really only mentions Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws and Are Women Human? briefly and without any substantive detail or analysis. Titled “A Firebrand Flickers” and subtitled: “The legendary feminist Catharine MacKinnon spurred the law to protect women, but the next wave is tired of feeling sheltered,” the article gives a stilted, overly negative overview of MacKinnon’s career, chock full of little jabs like this sentence: “The New York Times has described the collaboration among MacKinnon and other feminist attorneys as leaving “some disagreement about who deserves credit for each new insight.” It seems to me that the author, Deborah Dinner, should have either attempted to ascertain who these “other feminist attorneys” referenced by the NYT actually were, and interviewed them, or left this snide aside out altogether. If she wanted to be fair, that is. But fairness clearly is not the agenda. Here are two paragraphs in which Dinner “explains” MacKinnon’s scholarship on pornography:

“The argument that MacKinnon constructs against pornography is powerful. For most visual pornographic images that exist, she reminds readers, a woman was actually the victim of the act depicted. MacKinnon’s rhetorical power increases with each of the shocking pornographic images she describes.

“But what her thinking on the issue lacks is nuance or degree. She fails to explain, for example, whether pictures of fellatio subordinate women in the same way as those in which, as she writes, “a woman actually had to be tied or cut or burned or gagged or whipped or chained, hung from a meat hook or from trees by ropes. . . .” Similarly, her tendency to refute First Amendment objections by describing the violence involved in making pornography does not answer why sex equality should trump free speech in judging pornographic images that aren’t violent.”

I know many smart, thoughtful people who disagree with MacKinnon about pornography to various degrees and from a range of perspectives, but I can’t imagine any of them oversimplifying, distorting, and dismissing her arguments quite that glibly. And then there are Dinner’s astounding generalizations about what “young feminists” think and feel, and why MacKinnon’s work is not relevant to them. Dinner wrote:

“Despite the continued relevance of MacKinnon’s theories, her voice may not be the best-suited to a feminist movement that has, in her own words, gone “at once mainstream and underground.” MacKinnon’s tendency to characterize men as oppressors and women as victims is unlikely to appeal to young feminists with a proliferation of political commitments and with identities that include more than gender. She has been taken to task for not sufficiently considering how women’s social positions are also shaped by race and sexual orientation. MacKinnon’s tone misses the pitch of today’s young feminists in other ways as well. The women whom MacKinnon writes about are victims. They are abused and battered, raped and humiliated, and murdered. Without denying the persistence and scale of sexual violence against women, today’s feminists may tire of MacKinnon’s relentless fulmination about women’s place in society. MacKinnon envisions gender equality as the removal of power relations from sexuality and, to that end, seeks to use the law to protect women from coercion:whether into the porn industry or into unwanted sex. But to young feminists, there is a difference between making the law sensitive to power structures and turning it into a paternalistic tool that associates femininity with victimhood in its efforts to protect.

“Third-wavers’ most substantive point of contention centers on MacKinnon’s view of pornography. Some feminists who agree with MacKinnon that pornography contributes to women’s subordination oppose her antipornography stance out of a commitment to free speech and a belief that a specific criminal law could successfully address coercion, assault, and injury that occurs in the production of pornography. In the 1980s, MacKinnon and Dworkin’s antipornography campaign instigated a heated contest within the feminist movement about whether the previous two decades’ sexual revolution had deepened women’s exploitation, or whether women’s equality depended on finally triumphing over the sexual double standard through such means as achieving greater access to pornography that women find pleasurable. The controversy contributed to the unraveling of second-wave feminist coalitions. From today’s perspective, the advocates of further sexual liberation seem to have won, at least in the pornography debate. Many women, including self-identified feminists, enjoy pornography made for heterosexual women and lesbians, as well as some forms of conventional porn. They discriminate between porn they find offensive and porn they find erotic, and they are able to play with the idea that submission can be sexy, without giving up their own demands for empowerment in real-life sex. MacKinnon believes that women who enjoy pornography do so only because society teaches them to associate sexual objectification with arousal; she regards feminist support for or tolerance of pornography as elitist academic posturing. Dismissing women’s sexuality as a form of false consciousness seems petty, and MacKinnon’s categorical opposition to pornography appears out of touch with today’s culture.”

In those two relatively short paragraphs alone Dinner managed to accuse MacKinnon of all sorts of perfidity, including being a relentless fulminator in the service of the patriarchy, petty, and out of touch with “today’s culture.” I’m not sure who elected Dinner the authoritative spokesperson of the third-wavers, but I am cautiously optimistic that most are intelligent and motivated enough to actually read MacKinnon’s words and make up their own minds about what she is saying, and whether it is relevant or important. I certainly hope so, anyway.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminists in Academia | Comments Off on Legal Affairs “Reviews” Catharine MacKinnon

“music and rants in honor of south dakota”

Laura Quilter at Derivative Works writes: “i’ve been too angry to post about south dakota : and really, too unsurprised and cynical to have anything particularly interesting to say : but some music has been particularly resonant to me the last few weeks watching the South Dakota legislators presume to regulate the personal lives and medical decisions of women.” You can see her playlist here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “music and rants in honor of south dakota”

April’s Radical Women of Color Carnival…

…will be hosted by the Woman of Color Blog. The topic is “Women of Color, Sex, Sexuality, Fucking and Love on the Internet.” Learn more here.

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on April’s Radical Women of Color Carnival…

“Sexuality, Sin, and Sacrifice – Deconstructing the Patriarchy. An interview with Dr. Mary Condren”

Andrew Lawless published this interview at “Three Monkeys Online” where you can read the whole thing. Below is merely the first three (introductory) paragraphs:

“Censorship is not limited to totalitarian States. It can be a subtle thing, when disconcerting ideas are not banned, but, through various means, marginalised. Dr. Mary Condren’s groundbreaking work The Serpent and the Goddess, a study on women, religion and power in Celtic Ireland, was never placed on an index of banned books, and yet it remained until recently a very difficult book to get your hands on. As Condren describes in the introduction to the latest edition of the book [New Island Books 2002], in 1989 when The Serpent and the Goddess was first published, despite an enthusiastic public reception and encouraging sales, getting the book into shops proved difficult. Perhaps not surprising, given the scope of the book. While concerned with themes of a universal importance, in an Ireland to a large extent dominated by the twin ideologies of Nationalism and Catholicism, the book challenged a number of ‘sacred cows’. For example, Condren argues in the book, “surely, just as England had colonised the people of Ireland, we Irish women were, just as effectively, a people colonised by the patriarchal relations of Church and State?”[The Serpent and the Goddess – pg xviii].

“Condren, a former Carmelite nun, has degrees in theology, sociology, and social anthropology. A combination of studies which she says, in the introduction to her book, has “to this day left me unable to read any text without asking questions about power, sexuality, and economics”. Her study on women, religion and power was written against a backdrop of continuing violence in Northern Ireland. Violence that has ensued for centuries, centring over rival claims to territory, and the legitimacy of those who hold sacramental and state power. Condren’s analysis was brave and radical, breaking one of the strongest taboos around the conflict, a taboo enforced by all sides that demanded religion be treated as having a subsidiary role in the conflict. “We take it for granted that the Fisherman of Nazareth has long since ceased to bear much relationship to historical Christianity. Can it be that we find ourselves in our current situation not because Christianity has failed, or has never been tried, but because as the historical carrier of patriarchy in the West it has succeeded?” [The Serpent and the Goddess – pg x].

“Condren is currently national director of the Institute for Feminism and Religion in Ireland, and continues to be a challenging and intelligent voice questioning the power relations within both religious and secular societies. The Serpent and the Goddess was written over fifteen years ago, but it remains as fresh as the power structures it highlighted remain prevalent. The analysis of Church & State relations, control over reproductive rights, and the role of patriarchy in violent conflict makes for fascinating reading in today’s world, where war is waged to ‘spread democracy’; where the European Union debates vigorously whether to include religious roots in its constitution; where, in a ‘pro-life’ culture, scientific research involving stem cells poses serious ethical issues for the State, but billions of dollars are spent annually ‘legitimately’ developing more weaponry without a moral qualm. Three Monkeys Online had the pleasure of talking with Dr. Mary Condren to discuss issues raised in her work.” …

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Sexuality, Sin, and Sacrifice – Deconstructing the Patriarchy. An interview with Dr. Mary Condren”

“Lynne Cheney is kind of manly, too.”

Anyone else read “Of Manliness and Men” in the 3/12/06 NYT and think, this is like some kind of Monty Python skit? If you missed it, here’s an excerpt:

Questions for Harvey C. Mansfield
Interview by DEBORAH SOLOMON

“Q: As a staunch neoconservative and the author of a new feminism-bashing book called “Manliness,” how are you treated by your fellow government professors at Harvard University.”

“Look, if I only consorted with conservatives, I would be by myself all the time. …

“What about President Bush? He’s a risk taker, but wouldn’t his penchant for long vacations be a strike against him?

“I wouldn’t say industriousness is a sign of manliness. That’s sort of wonkish. Experts do that.

“What about Dick Cheney?

“He hunts. And he curses openly. Lynne Cheney is kind of manly, too. I once worked with her on the advisory council of the National Endowment for the Humanities.

“In your book, you say Margaret Thatcher is an ideal woman, but isn’t she the manliest of all?

“I was told by someone who visited her that she is very feminine with her husband.

“Why is that so important to you in light of her other achievements?

“We need roles. Roles give us mutual expectations of what is either correct or good behavior. Women are neater than men, they make nests, and all these other stereotypes are mostly true. Wives and mothers correct you; they hold you to a standard; they want to make you better. …

“When was the last time you did something that required physical strength?

“It’s true that nothing in my career requires physical strength, but in my relations with women, yes.

“Such as?

“Lifting things, opening things. My wife is quite small.

“What do you lift?

“Furniture. Not every night, but routinely.”

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Lynne Cheney is kind of manly, too.”

Good Things to Read

“Letter to Alex and Chris, Twelve Years in the Future” at One Good Thing

“The Rape of the Earth” at Creek Running North

“South Dakota Special” at Michael Berube’s blog

“Women Are Like Sheep: Cuddly, Easily Led” by Amanda Marcotte at Pandagon

“Donna Reed Meets Michael Corleone: More Thoughts On Niceness” at the Happy Feminist

“Ordinary People’s History” at Woman in Comfy Shoes

“Black. White. Episode 1” at Reappropriate

“BlogHer writings & SXSW” at Sour Duck

“Caesarean Deliveries: Scientific Progress Gone Boink” at Blogpourri

“Workplace Harassment and Diversity Training” by Orly Lobel at Prawsfblawg

“Worldwide Glass Ceilings at Work” at Workplace Prof Blog

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Good Things to Read

From the Feminist Law Professors Mailbox

Hi folks,
As some of you may have heard, Heather Corinna of Scarleteen.com and I are spearheading a young feminist project, the All Girl Army (http://allgirlarmy.org). Right now, we are looking for feminists between the ages of 10 and 23 to get involved, and we are also seeking older women for web design (desperately needed), outreach, editorial, community management, future planning, and other committees. Please spread the word far and wide about this, and if you’re interested in joining a committee, email myself (jenny@allgirlarmy.org) and the group at large (enlist@allgirlarmy.org). We believe this project is going to offer an amazing and unprecedented space for young feminist community and organizing, and we would love to have you all involved.
Peace,
Jenny

All Girl Army/ The Young Feminists Project is looking for a few good women to create, nurture and enjoy a women’s community targeted to young women internationally, who identify as feminist, between the ages of 10 and 23.

We expect to debut the site in May of this year, and it will include:

  • 29 featured blogs by young, feminist women and one overarching blog, collectively edited and compiled.
  • An active, moderated discussion board primarily serving, and intended to benefit, young women with a limited area for those of all genders, as well as a limited area for women over 23.
  • Cooperative ownership and management of the site.
  • Collective, dynamic projects driven by young women.
  • A myriad of current resources for young feminists: books, magazines, film, music, art, events and symposiums, other websites, scholarship funds and organizations.

What’s our goal?

  • To increase visibility and self-representation of young women: of your lives, your ideas, your goals, your achievements and your struggles: to counteract lookism and the media’s representation of young women with your real voices, unscripted words and real lives.
  • To help foster a supportive, creative and proactive women’s community, and nurture relationships and discussion among women of all ages; to help young women develop their feminism and their autonomy via women’s community, and discover that other women are allies, not competition.
  • To create and sustain a collective board of feminist women of all ages to manage the site, with a majority vote in decisions given to women under 23; to provide experience for young women in creating, organizing and managing community, advocacy and support for women.
  • To provide mentorship for young women to learn skills you’re interested in.
  • To provide a visible exploration and examination of feminism, of growing up female, by and for young women.
  • To show the world the hearts and minds of a whole lot of seriously awesome young women, and to give others, young and old, the chance to be as inspired by all of you as we are.

Our board and founders are an evolving and eclectic group of women of all ages, from all walks of life. We are everything from a mother of ten to a sexuality educator; from an IT professional to an advocate for battered women; from a women’s studies student to a sculptural jeweler, all of us feminist, all of us dedicated to women.

One woman said that what we’re trying to do is “like the radical Girl Scouts!” That sounds pretty good to us. Namely, we want to pass the torch in the best ways we know how, because we feel that all of you are going to redefine feminism as we know it, and have the capacity to make an incredible mark on the world. We feel the internet is an optimal place to do so because it gives us the ability to work internationally and dynamically.


Jennifer K. Lobasz
Department of Political Science
University of Minnesota
http://journey-to-ithaca.com

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on From the Feminist Law Professors Mailbox

“Hagar The Horrible” Is Sexist Tripe

Hagar_The_Horrible.gif

Cartoon (as it appeared in my local paper today) copied from this link.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “Hagar The Horrible” Is Sexist Tripe

The Caffeine Curve

caffeinegraph.jpg

Via Energy Fiend. See also: “You Know You’ve Had Too Much Caffeine When…”

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on The Caffeine Curve

“South Dakota’s Abortion Application Form”

From “Spittle & Ink,” this is satirical and quite funny if you are a gallows humor aficianado.

Share
Posted in Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on “South Dakota’s Abortion Application Form”